|
This is really neat
Quote: : Som, S.M. et al. (2012) Air density 2.7 billion years ago limited to less than twice modern levels by fossil raindrop imprints. Nature, 484, 359362.
According to the Faint Young Sun paradox, during the late Archaean eon a ...
Started by SteveF on
, 12 posts
by 9 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at talkrational):
(2012) Air density 2.7 billion years ago limited to less than twice and oxygen2, 3, 4, 5, 6,....
Et al.
|
|
One area of much debate is the effectiveness or "correctness" of the built-in ideal-gas modelled air density correction.
I think we can all agree that the existing model is not a "one size fits all" solution and will always need tweaking. The existing...
Started by jsmcortina on
, 20 posts
by 15 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at msextra):
Nissan 240sx w/KA24de-T, PLX SM AFR WB the air....
As I understand it, the air density will drop due to heating by the induction tract*** potentially give us a more consistent air density corr calc.
Correction was necessary.
|
|
The density of air differs depending on the temperature. At 70 degrees F it has a density of approximately 1.2 kg/m3. ChaCha on!
Started by Answered on
, 1 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at chacha):
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
This simulation display how air density, air pressure and temperature vary with altitude.
The formulas used were from http://wahiduddin.net/calc/density_altitude.htm
h=44.3308 - 4.94654 P^{0.190263} where h = geopotential altitude (km), p=actual air pressure...
Started by Fu-Kwun Hwang on
, 1 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at ntnu):
|
|
I changed my air density correction from normal correction/coolant back to iat correction due to heatsoak issues, but the green dot on the graph still follows coolant. So is it correcting for ait or coolant? Is this a TS issue? I'm running ms1 hires and...
Started by krhodes on
, 3 posts
by 2 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at msextra):
Attachments custom_for_IAT.ini (4....
If you use the attached file as your custom.ini
it will display for IAT .
The comments are there, but for some reason no option was enabled .
That feature looks to have never been quite completed in the MS1 Extra code. .
|
|
I just got a 4150 throttlebody for my vic jr intake and also ordered a regular sunoco bolt on hood, so it will be about 4-5" from the windshield to get air. Should I get a speed density tune and run with a filter on top of the throttlebody and remove ...
Started by second_2_none on
, 2 posts
by 2 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at ls1tech):
Basically.
Of their 4in flex hoses, and then used the Texas Speed 100mm maf and the FTP 104mm air lid.
|
|
I have a question for the people running DSMlink V3.
My son and I are building a 99 GST and I am having trouble deciding weither to run a GM MAF or Speed Density. I have DSMlink V3 lite and for now the car will be running a VTA BOV, (do not bash please...
Started by cabot2g on
, 21 posts
by 9 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at dsmtuners):
I personally found that....
Speed Density and a GM MAF do and cost, really.
Wiring & logging a GM IAT sensor Hope this kind of helps. .
I do know that if you want to go with speed density, you'll need to install a GM IAT LINK..
Still learning.
|
|
CarBerry ROM - 16bit Speed Density Project
Attention Tuners: If you are tuning for money and you use this ROM on a customers car (even if they "provide it"), I would request that you send $20 per customer via Paypal with the DONATE button above or below...
Started by Carbibbles on
, 15 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at romraider):
Y - Base Engine Load
=
M - Speed Density Base Load Determination (MAP Multiplier)
X....
Basically it uses Manifold Absolute is simple linear equation in the form of "Y=mX+b" .
Speed Density
This ROM uses a Speed Density control scheme.
|
|
Hi all...
Please excuse the apparent noobiness of the question.
I would like to know if there is a guideline for power density per kg/hr of air flow. Alternatively, is it better to base power density on air velocity?
For a given flow of air, let's say...
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at eng-tips):
|
|
The upcoming years will see us flooded with sub-par chiclets keyboards... but at least the screens might get better.
Started by Summilux on
, 16 posts
by 10 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at thinkpads):
Maybe, etc., the higher density is useless....
For everyday usage, there is no increase of information density on screen and therefore no practical advantage.
Personally, I think the idea of higher-than-resolution-of-eye density is stupid.
|