|
Czy ktoś miał może okazje porównywać te obiektywy...?? Szukam setki i ciekawi mnie, które z tych szkieł jest lepsze.... optycznie
Z góry dziękuję za jakąkolwiek podpowiedz...
Started by asknet on
, 10 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at canon-board):
A ciekawsze ?? Aberracje 100/2.0 mogę potwierdzić, ale że jest 2x szybsze niż 100/2.8 to nie powiem" i sporadycznie portret polecam lekturę na temat 100/2.0:
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...ns aperture of f/2.8, I recommend ....
|
|
08-26-2011, 03:18 AM I have received a ton of questions through email over the last couple weeks on the Canon mount. Thought a thread was fitting.
First of all.. Let me introduce he first production Titanium Canon EOS mount that just came off the line...
Started by Jarred Land on
, 10 posts
by 10 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at reduser):
Mark Toia
Director / DP / Founder of Zoom.
08-26-2011, 03:33 AM Very cool indeed.
Canon mount is $2000.
|
|
I am looking to replace an older Canon DSLR and have been hearing good things about the T3i.
During the winter months I take a lot of indoor soccer photos in low light conditions.
Does anyone have experience with these kinds of shots using the T3i? Feedback...
Started by Distracted mom on
, 32 posts
by 13 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at dpreview):
Personally, and I'm a Canon guy, I think the nikon d7000 is a better option than any of the canons below ....
Long Live Canon)
CANON
70-200/2.8 - 135/2.0 - 100/2.0 - 85/1.8 - 35/2.0
SIGMA
EX 50-500 - EX and f2.8.
Death.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:16:54 -0000, "Alan Smithee" <me@privacy.net
Just an observation, but why would anyone buy a 5D II over a D700? The only
reason I can see is the Canon lens choice. If Canon didn't have monopoly
over lens choice, they would...
Started by Alan Smithee on
, 37 posts
by 16 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Littleboy;8Zidnf0wAf9ik8zUnZ2dnUVZ8rydnZ2d@pipex.net
What monopoly? Canon makes some excellent glass (as well as some
mediocre glass....
--
David J.
At the 21/2.8, 35/2.0,
and 100/2.0 macro) and the Canon landscapers will be happy.
|
|
I have asked this question on flickr, but didnt get any response. Maybe I am more lucky over here...
I shoot mainly with my Canon 5d II's digital (work) and with my Leica M7 film (personal stuff). I'd love to have next to my analog Leica a digital one...
Started by overtoom on
, 25 posts
by 18 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at rangefinderforum):
If you are keeping your Canon and M7, I see no harm in trying the M8 might be a good in-between....
Just do it.
Of all the cameras and lenses I have I can't think of any that I would and beautiful rich files .
50/0.95 and Canon LTM 100/2.0.
|
|
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:21:19 -0700 (PDT), Bjarne <vesterport@gmail.com
Jeg har på det sidste taget en del portrætfotos med kombinationen 5D
og 70-200mm 2.8L.... Det fungerer jo ganske glimrende.
Men hvad er brugt i studie sammenhæng, er der nogle...
Started by Bjarne on
, 13 posts
by 8 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Det vil for Canon sige:
* 85/1.8 og 100/2.0, som gode, lette og.
Det "klassiske" er vel 85-135mm.
|
|
What do you think about 135 lenses?
I was going to get 135/2, but the price tag is quite impressive, so I decided to trade-in my EF 70-300 IS to reduce my spendings....
But yesterday I've found a 135/2.8 C/Y lens that together with a lens adapter will...
Started by Fred Miranda on
, 16 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at fredmiranda):
I guess I have to save....
I guess I have to save some more money for Canon "magical" 135/2
What do you think about...
And automatic diaphragm, then by all means save up for the Canon L-perhaps it and the 200mm F 2.0L are two preferable...
|
|
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:07:48 +0200, Gregor Szaktilla <spam.sz@ktilla.de
... kauft zweimal
[ ] stimmt
[ ] stimmt nicht
[x] stimmt manchmal
Hallo zusammen!
Diesen Spruch vom "zweimal kaufen" habe ich in d.r.f. schon mehrmals
gelesen. Und nach ...
Started by Gregor Szaktilla on
, 79 posts
by 31 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Für Bokeh mag ich nicht so sehr....
Erstes Teleobjektiv 100-300 USM von Canon gebraucht und dann noch bei
Ebay gekauft.
Invalid@home.de
Alex Eberl schrieb:
Ich hatte hier kürzlich eine Umfrage zu dem 180 Canon-Makro und dem für mich.
|
|
I know the zeiss has a good reputation, and i am guessing it is a true 1:1 macro capable lens?
are there other excellent options to consider here?
i have the nikon 55 micro and it is a nice lens, but would like to add something in the 100mm range for ...
Started by Username Password
FM Forum Rules on
, 18 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at fredmiranda):
Zeiss ZF/ZF2 MP 100/2.0 is better ....
With the 500D Canon or Nikon mounts using a Leitax mount adapter (Leitax.com) which are easy to install macro.
Use a Canon 500D close-up lens (via an adapter ring 67->72 mm, or 67->77 mm).
|
|
For whatever reason you never sold it so it's still sitting somewhere on a back shelf. Maybe near state-of-the-art back in its day, but that was a long time ago.
For myself, I still have the 2nd digital camera I bought: an Olympus C-2500L around the late...
Started by Timzee on
, 94 posts
by 80 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at dpreview):
Don't remember when I bought it or when it first came out .
CANON
70-200/2.8 - 135/2.0 - 100/2.0 - 85/1.8 - 35/2.0
SIGMA
EX 50-500 - EX 120-300/2.8 - 18-200OS=1027&message=35565277 Canon S1-IS 3mp, still works like new.
|
