Omgili - forum search, search forums  
  

Discussions about differential equation

Displaying 1 - 10 out of 3,465 discussions.  
RSS Feed Options
Time Frame: (Any time)   Minimum number of replies: (2)   Minimum number of discussing users: (0)
  |  

Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  
Keep this page open to be updated with the newest discussions automatically.
Solve the differential equation :
Started by on , 4 posts by 4 people.  
Multiplying with makes the equation homogeneous..
Equation is not homogeneous.
Solution.
Sonnhard.
Mcrasher You have solved hello, this is a Bernoulli-equation.
I've encountered a problem while trying to use the answer from a NDSolve in two separate plot commands. To illustrate the problem, I'll use a simple differential equation and only one plot command. If I write something like this: {Plot[x[t], {t, 0, 10...
Started by on , 3 posts by 3 people.  
So in the expression you posted, Plot[x[t], {t, 0, 10}] just goes ahead and evaluates... .
Your problem is that Plot[] does some funny things to make plotting more convenient, and one of the things it does is just not plot things it can't evaluate numerically .
I have to solve the following differential equation: where you assume solutions of the form: , , , are constants and is the imaginary unit. Could someone please tell me how to obtain explicit expressions for , , , ? I got as far as rewriting the assumed...
Started by on , 12 posts by 2 people.  
The reason why I need to have is NOT time dependent... .
Of course, the differential equation has analytic solutions, but NONE on the form differential equations and dynamical systems, Ferdinand Verhulst).
For something impossible.
Ask your Facebook Friends
I'm trying to solve a partial differential equation which I derived from the Navier-Stokes equation: With the following B.C.'s: B.C. 1: B.C. 2: B.C. 3: While solving it I get stuck and I'm wondering if this is the right method to solve the equation. Especially...
Started by on , 4 posts by 4 people.  
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at sosmath):
Differential equation I'm stuck on how to solve d^2y/dx^2=-2*x*y*(dy/dx) I've tried substituting y=vx or v=dy/dx, but don't seem to be getting anywhere! Any help really appreciated, thanks! :)
Started by on , 5 posts by 3 people.  
So let y = kx^-2 and ....
Re: Differential equation infront.
Re: Differential equation I've found if you integrate both sides with respect to x (using parts a couple of times) then you can show that dy/dx does not depend on x.
I have the following differential equation: and I need to find the general solution. I end up with: And from here I can't solve in terms of y (because it's non-linear). How can I proceed?
Started by on , 3 posts by 2 people.  
I figured the following....
Separate variables: Integrate: Now, you can solve for y.
Separate variables: Integrate: Now, you can solve for y.
I think you may have the incorrect set up at the end .
Find a second order DE y=ax^3+bx^-2? Differential Equation? Find a second order DE y=ax^3+bx^-2 Any body know how to do this im lost so im turning to yahoo answers ha ha
Started by on , 2 posts by 2 people.  
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at yahoo):
I hope.
X^4) The latter is then a second-order DE for which the given equation is a solution.
Differential Equation Question I'm doing some differentiation questions and I got this one wrong, but I'm not sure why. I have to find the general solution of The first thing I did was to move the to the same side Then I took it out as a common factor...
Started by on , 3 posts by 3 people.  
Re: Differential Equation Question Note Using logs properties...
Hi guys, just embarking on the journey of modeling with differential equations and solving them. I have a more conceptual quesiton. Linear differential equations in my book are defined to be ones where F(t, y, y', y'',...,yn) = 0 is a linear function ...
Started by on , 1 posts by 1 people.  
I rewrote the equation in form; And used integration factor method to solve for y (lengthy process.) Then I used integration by parts for and Is there a shorter way of solving this type of equation?
Started by on , 4 posts by 2 people.  
What other long way is there? The method of undetermined coefficients .
Not really.
Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  

Related Message Boards & Forums

  • Calculus: limits differentiation integration
  • Discover | Resolved Engineering Questions - Yahoo! Answers
  • Stack Overflow
  • AoPS Calculus Computations and Tutorials • Art of Problem Solving
  • Classical Physics
Related Searches
An Introduction to Partial Differential Equations 2005 By Yehuda Pinchover solutions manual   
More Information


Forum Search About Omgili Help Plugins Forum/Board Owners Privacy

i
In Title
In Topic
In Reply
Exclude
Boost