|
What is the most efficient Javascript/AJAX toolkit?
Started by bgreen1989 on
, 17 posts
by 17 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Best of luck!
"Most efficient" is hard to judge, but I have used Prototype and Mootools, both in the previous answers, jQuery....
Developer.yahoo.com/yui/ Really, it's a bit of a subjective question; most efficient will depend on what with.
|
|
Is it efficient to use css frame works? If so, which one is best? Or any comparison comments?
Started by rajakvk on
, 6 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Really it depends on your individual skills, preferences....
You are better off using something like jQuery (and the jQuery plugins) and achieve the effects you want with more control and space for customization .
Personally, I think that is a bit of an overkill .
|
|
Just curious, which is more efficient?
This:
String a = someString + "." + anotherString;
Or this:
String a = someString + '.' + anotherString;
Started by aberrant80 on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Premature.
Of thing if the profiler tells you that a particular statement is a bottleneck in your code.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
What's the best and most efficient book to learn JavaScript?
Started by Kombucha on
, 16 posts
by 16 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Hi, i would recommend " Head First JavaScript " it is nice to read, with... .
JavaScript the good parts.
Thanks Rich.
See also David Flanagan's web site as well as Douglas Crockford's videos and his essays JavaScript .. .
JavaScript: The Definitive Guide.
|
|
What would be the most efficient data type to store a UUID/GUID in databases that do not have a native UUID/GUID data type? 2 BIGINTs?
And what would be the most efficient code (C# preferred) to convert to and from a GUID to that type?
Thanks.
Started by fung on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Add experience, the UUID broken up into ....
I would imagine it would end up being less efficient.
Int16, Byte, Byte, Byte, Byte, Byte, Byte, Byte, Byte) Guid(string)
While it may be more efficient, it would take 4 fields in the database..
|
|
I have a bit array that can be very dense in some parts and very sparse in others. The array can get as large as 2**32 bits. I am turning it into a bunch of tuples containing offset and length to make it more efficient to deal with in memory. However,...
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
How efficient.
For example, in C++, the representation, you could just copy the bits as a bit array where you have offset, length, and values .
efficient array, and in non-dense areas you get implied zeros.
|
|
Are there any tools techniques to build more energy efficient applications, Any articles,rules or best practices for green programming?
Started by Jlouro on
, 27 posts
by 26 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
So eliminating things like busy waits for example out of an old server may be more energy ....
efficient (as the CPU runs cooler and fans don't need to come on - plus on some OSes an idle CPU goes into a more energy efficient state).
|
|
I have a set of UIDs - let's say around 200. What is the most efficient way to retrieve all their LDAP records?
The first thing that comes to mind is a query that's a big chain of ORs:
(|(uid=jdoe)(uid=mdawson)(uid=fwright)...)
Is there a better way?
Started by Joshua Swink on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at serverfault):
I've found it faster at times (depending....
It depends on what object properties you're retrieving and the locality of the LDAP server .
Http://stackoverflow.com/questions/927499/ldap-query-syntax-to-compare-to-a-list suggests the OR is the only way to do it .
|
|
Due to the overhead of calling the garbage collector in the CLR, is it more efficient to leave it, or force to garbage collection when objects go out of scope?
Started by Euclid on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Unless if you are working to Andrew's comments, unnecessarily calling GC.Collect will cause otherwise efficient Gen-0 collections.
At how much efficient the underlying garbage collector algorithm is.
|
|
Yes, There's More Than One Way To Do It ™, but there must be a canonical or most efficient or most concise way (the latter perhaps being at odds). I'll add answers I know of and see what percolates to the top.
Started by dreeves on
, 13 posts
by 10 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
He wrote down his findings here and incorporated them info .
('', @lines);
See the summary of Perl6::Slurp which is incredibly flexible and generally does the right thing of slurping and which is most efficient.
|
