|
Hi all,
On my way in understanding the transaction-type attribute of persistence.xml , i came across an issue / discrepency between hibernate-core and JPA-hibernate which looks weird.
I am not pretty sure whether it is a missing implementation with JPA...
Started by Jegan on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Just build to spec and voilà! And if really you want to know, you have the source .
As this is an implementation detail.
|
|
I often have to debug java code which was written so that there is an interface and exactly one implementation of that interface.
For instance there would be an interface Foo with exactly one implementation called FooImpl. In the following code if I ctrl...
Started by HappyEngineer on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
If there is only one implementation it will open it directly, otherwise it will let you box gives you two options to click on:
Open....
Move the cursor to the method call press Ctrl-T select your desired implementation hit enter you ask for.
|
|
What will be the implementation for
public int hashCode() { }
method in singleton class? Please do provide me the implementation
Started by jezhilvalan on
, 6 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
If you have an immutable object, then you will have to implement a hashCode ImmutableNotSingleton(int x) { this....
If it's a singleton, you don't need to provide an implementation, as it will be the same object with just an immutable object .
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
How to implement explicit interface implementation in VB.NET?
Started by mcxiand on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
In VB.Net, that's easy, because the implementing methods can have.
Explicit interface implementation in C# also allows a separate implementation .
Just one more word.
Through the interfaces.
|
|
My quick search reveals the reference implementation ( http://stax.codehaus.org ), the Woodstox implementation ( http://woodstox.codehaus.org ), and Sun's SJSXP implementation (https://sjsxp.dev.java.net/).
Please comment on the relative merits of these...
Started by Jeff C on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Article from Sun
http://javolution.org/ has a good StAX implementation
Woodstox wins every time for me.
|
|
Are there any GZIPInputStream implementation for J2ME available. I would prefer an Apache Style License
Started by Ram on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
I'm not sure of the licensing but it might be worth a look. .
IIRC the phoneME project includes an implementation of GZIPInputStream .
TinyLine implementation should be OK also for commercial usages.
|
|
I have method in Class which is implementation of Interface. When I made it Explicit implementation I got compiler error
The modifier 'public' is not valid for this item
Why it is not allowed to have public for explicit interface implementation ?
Started by Prashant on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
(Microsoft has an overview on explicit interface implementation )
Most people don't agree ....
The reason for an explicit interface implementation is to avoid name collisions with the end result as interfaces cannot have non-public members.
|
|
There is no JAI implementation of this.
Started by euphoria83 on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Another implementation of a steerable filter is also here ..
Are you looking for this ?
A good implementation, with source code, although probably not very the ImageJ UI.
|
|
Hi,
My basic understanding is that there is no implementation for a pure virtual function, however, I was told there might be implementation for pure virtual function.
class A { virtual void f() = 0; }; void A::f() { cout<<"Test"<<endl; }
...
Started by skydoor on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
A pure....
The funny thing is that once you derive implementation.
Derived classes to implement the method f() (even if it is only to call the default implementation destructor -- in that case you must provide an implementation.
|
|
Is there a public implementation of the Rope data structure in C#?
Started by luvieere on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
You could probably convert it to C# in less than an hour. .
I'm not aware of a Rope implementation (though there probably is one!), but if you're only after implementation .
|
