Discussions about lower upper bounds

C# generics - without lower bounds by design? I was reading an interview with Joshua Bloch in Coders at Work, where he lamented the introduction of generics in Java 5. He doesn't like the specific implementation largely because the variance support—Java's wildcards—makes it unnecessarily complex.... Started by ehnmark on Sunday, January 03, 2010, 4 posts by 4 people.   Read the full thread at stackoverflow Discuss this with your friends on Facebook Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow): You could say: void Copy<T, U>. Not need lower bound constraints to make that work in C#.

How do I work out the upper bound and lower bound of this number? How do I work out the upper bound and lower bound of this number? Upper bounds and lower bounds confuses me how do I work it out? How do I work out the Upper bound and lower bound of 9.8? Started by we-live-in-a-hateful-world on Sunday, May 27, 2012, 2 posts by 2 people.   Read the full thread at yahoo Discuss this with your friends on Facebook Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at yahoo): Take another look at the question and write it again with all the information that is missing above. . Your question doesn't make any sense.

specifying bounds for optimization On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:15:04 +0000 (UTC), "Tiam " <tiamz84@gmail.com hi, In using the optimization functions provided by MATLAB, is there a way to specify two polygons as the outer and inner bounds, instead of the upper and lower bounds of x? Imagine... Started by Tiam on Friday, July 03, 2009, 4 posts by 2 people.   Read the full thread at omgili Discuss this with your friends on Facebook Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili): Can i still specify bounds in this scheme? thanks On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 19:57:01 +0000 (UTC. It is far more difficult to specify and a like . The problem into a simple set of bounds only in the polar radius.

fmincon not respecting variable bounds On Fri, 1 May 2009 10:50:03 +0000 (UTC), "David " <fictitious@email.com Does anyone have experience of fmincon not respecting the lower/upper bounds on design variables? I'm doing an optimisation of a highly nonlinear function with 7 variables ... Started by David on Friday, May 01, 2009, 4 posts by 3 people.   Read the full thread at omgili Discuss this with your friends on Facebook Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili): Or, use my fminsearchbnd, which absolutely assures you .... Set your bounds just a wee bit inside to avoid this. Lt;fictitious@email.com Fmincon will sometimes exceed the bounds by a slight amount if it wants to look in that direction.

upper bound of integration (numerical evaluation) On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:30:20 +0000 (UTC), "Dimitar Dimitrov" <mail_mitko@example.com Hi, I have a curve parametrized using a parameter "T". The relation between "T" and the length of the curve "L" is expressed through an integral of some function... Started by Dimitar Dimitrov on Monday, March 23, 2009, 5 posts by 3 people.   Read the full thread at omgili Discuss this with your friends on Facebook Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili): On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:46:01 +0000 (UTC), "John D'Errico" <woodchips@rochester.rr.com "Dimitar Dimitrov" <mail_mitko@example.com There is no standard function for your explicit problem, but fzero is a rootfinder which will be a better choice ... .

Attempted to access a(2); index out of bounds because numel(a)=1. On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 08:40:25 +0000 (UTC), "baks bah" <bakarr@gmail.com am having some errors with my code but i don't understand why. Can someone help me please. below is the portion of the code and having proble with. avec(2:nx-1)= -r; for k=2:... Started by baks bah on Saturday, December 05, 2009, 3 posts by 2 people.   Read the full thread at omgili Discuss this with your friends on Facebook Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili): *snip* Execute the following command then run your code: dbstop if error When you receive the debug... . On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 23:43:14 -0500, "Steven Lord" <slord@mathworks.com "baks bah" <bakarr@gmail.comnews:hfd69p$j4l$1@fred.mathworks.com.. .

lsqlin producing values outside of bounds part 2: NANs On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:32:02 +0000 (UTC), "Erica B" <ebickford@wisc.edu This is a follow-up to my earlier post on June 12 regarding lsqlin in the optimization toolbox returning values outside of given bounds. Part of the problem appears to be lsqlin... Started by Erica B on Monday, June 22, 2009, 3 posts by 2 people.   Read the full thread at omgili Discuss this with your friends on Facebook Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili): Using +/- Inf in the lower and upper bounds is fine. I claim this is Not A Bug in LSQLIN.

Frequently asked question about error bounds? On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 02:50:39 -0800 (PST), "berra.84" <berra.84@spray.se What is the correct error bound between client and server? In the RFC documentation I read one thing and in many theads another. I'm confused so please help me. Which is correct... Started by berra.84 on Sunday, November 01, 2009, 6 posts by 4 people.   Read the full thread at omgili Discuss this with your friends on Facebook Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili): Delay be lower than delay for server xx.xx.xx.x2 ? The same is true for the stratum 3 syncronizaion.

Integral of Gaussian over a ball: closed form or any lower bound known? On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:26:32 -0700 (PDT), Golabi Doon <golabidoon@gmail.com Hello everyone, Consider a random variable X in R^d that follows a multivariate normal distribution. The parameters of the distribution, i.e. the mean vector M and covariance... Started by Golabi Doon on Thursday, October 15, 2009, 9 posts by 4 people.   Read the full thread at omgili Discuss this with your friends on Facebook Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili): If you want a poor bound then approximate the density be a constant. Graham Jones not bothered to try an web searchs. There are also upper bounds on the Bayes error (p97 onwards). Integrand.

Improving the quick sort. If possible, how can I improve the following quick sort(performance wise).Any suggestions? void main() { quick(a,0,n-1); } void quick(int a[],int lower,int upper) { int loc; if(lower<upper) { loc=partition(a,lower,upper); quick(a,lower,loc-1); quick... Started by Ravi on Friday, November 06, 2009, 14 posts by 14 people.   Read the full thread at stackoverflow Discuss this with your friends on Facebook Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow): That follows the above suggestion might look as follows void quick(int a[], int lower, int upper) { while (lower < upper) { int loc = partition(a, lower, upper); if (loc - lower < upper - ....