|
I wanted to know what people used as a best practice for limiting memory on IIS [5/6/7]. I'm running on 32bit web servers with 4GB of physical memory, and no /3GB switch. I'm currently limiting my app pools to 1GB used memory. Is this too low? any thoughts...
Started by jwmiller5 on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
And more specifically:
To prevent you should set the limit....
If during normalAll the limits in the application pool are for bad behaving apps.
So 1 Gb is sensible.
A limit it will crash around 1.2 - 1.6 Gb (if memory serves).
|
|
I strongly expect this to end up as a duplication, but I can't seem to find it.
I've got a C++ program that I normally run on 64-bit MacOSX SnowLeopard.
When I try to run it on a 32-bit Windows 7, it runs out of memory. Probably, it really needs too much...
Started by bmargulies on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
32 bit Process have a 4GB memory limit, but it's spitted into 2GB for the userAccording to this table , the limit per process should be 2GB or 3GB with some registry tampering to how your app runs....
Addressable memory to 3GB.
|
|
I want to create a LinkedHashMap which will limit its size based on available memory (ie. when freeMemory + (maxMemory - allocatedMemory) gets below a certain threshold). This will be used as a form of cache, probably using "least recently used" as a ...
Started by sanity on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
This should work fine so long as the overhead of SoftReference plus Map.Entry is significantly... .
Anyway, the simplest thing is to use SoftReference s in the map .
IIRC, there's a SoftCache in Sun's JRE that has had many problems .
Caches tend to be problematic.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
In windows (or any other OS for that matter) what determines how much stack I can use? The name of this very website makes me assume it's possible to run out of stack so should I avoid putting large amounts of data on the stack?
Started by Benj on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
A specific limit with your linker , which usually has a specific default, often quite lower than what.
|
|
Lets see if there are any Fanuc experts logged in
Seem to be hitting some sort of memory or line limit on Fanuc 0M. Checking memory used on the control, I have
Progs used: 1; Free: 62
Mem used: 3970; Free: 28797
(I cleared out any other progs just in ...
Started by darrylhutchinson on
, 20 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at practicalmachinist):
So the limit increased at some point, if it was indeed lower for earlier models in, confirming my initial....
Mine has 128k.
So the limit increased at some point, if it was indeed lower for earlier memory.
Mine has 128k.
M memory.
|
|
Everyone,
Working to overclock my cards and when I enable unofficial overclocking, voltage control, etc everything looks good and I have a slider for core that goes to 1600+ but the memory is actually worse then CCC, it limits me to 1375 for some reason...
Started by dabear95 on
, 4 posts
by 2 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at hardforum):
Should fix....
Any thoughts? Tried all 3 settings or from a desktop shortcut .
Control, etc everything looks good and I have a slider for core that goes to 1600+ but the memory is actually worse then CCC, it limits me to 1375 for some reason.
|
|
Hi,
My health analyzer showing "Application pools recycle when memory limits are exceeded." as a remedy at http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/hh427306.aspx i have checked all application pool and nothing has mark on Virtual memory usage (in KB...
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at microsoft):
The Health Analyzer....
Done iisreset but no luck.
Varun Malhotra
If my post solves your problem could you mark the post as Answered or Vote As Helpful if my post has been helpful for you .
I would suggest you to do an iisreset after making these settings .
|
|
Are there any filename or path length limits on Linux?
Started by ro on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at serverfault):
Those....
And for the sake of saving time (and anchoring it to memory):
ext2, ext3, ext4, zfs: no pathname limits; 255http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems
See the section called "limits bytes filename limit.
|
|
I have a probably stupid question but I know some phones can't use memory cards that are too big.
And I guess the TH55 isn't a phone but can it handle a 16gb pro duo memory stick with an adaptor?
I've been thinking of ditching my 8gb ipod and just using...
Started by jpth55 on
, 9 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at 1src):
Search for the thread FAT32 Driver.
DimitryG developed this driver to access larger memory cards.
|
|
I am looking for a simple in-memory (and in-process) cache for short-term caching of query data (but short-term meaning beyond request/response, i.e. session boundary). EhCache would probably work, but it looks as if it might not offer one thing that ...
Started by StaxMan on
, 8 posts
by 8 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
So the factors....
)) ??
This would limit your cache to the amount of available memory but not kill the rest of your as guessing the memory usage of the object, for a reasonable algorithm you would also need to guess to memory size.
|