|
I wanted to know what people used as a best practice for limiting memory on IIS [5/6/7]. I'm running on 32bit web servers with 4GB of physical memory, and no /3GB switch. I'm currently limiting my app pools to 1GB used memory. Is this too low? any thoughts...
Started by jwmiller5 on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
And more specifically:
To prevent you should set the limit....
If during normalAll the limits in the application pool are for bad behaving apps.
So 1 Gb is sensible.
A limit it will crash around 1.2 - 1.6 Gb (if memory serves).
|
|
I strongly expect this to end up as a duplication, but I can't seem to find it.
I've got a C++ program that I normally run on 64-bit MacOSX SnowLeopard.
When I try to run it on a 32-bit Windows 7, it runs out of memory. Probably, it really needs too much...
Started by bmargulies on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
32 bit Process have a 4GB memory limit, but it's spitted into 2GB for the userAccording to this table , the limit per process should be 2GB or 3GB with some registry tampering to how your app runs....
Addressable memory to 3GB.
|
|
I want to create a LinkedHashMap which will limit its size based on available memory (ie. when freeMemory + (maxMemory - allocatedMemory) gets below a certain threshold). This will be used as a form of cache, probably using "least recently used" as a ...
Started by sanity on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
This should work fine so long as the overhead of SoftReference plus Map.Entry is significantly... .
Anyway, the simplest thing is to use SoftReference s in the map .
IIRC, there's a SoftCache in Sun's JRE that has had many problems .
Caches tend to be problematic.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
In windows (or any other OS for that matter) what determines how much stack I can use? The name of this very website makes me assume it's possible to run out of stack so should I avoid putting large amounts of data on the stack?
Started by Benj on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
A specific limit with your linker , which usually has a specific default, often quite lower than what.
|
|
Question
I have a X100e Thinkpad and it came with 3GB of ram and a 32bit operating system and I was hoping to upgrade it to 4GB, but I've read it is not worth doing so unless it's 64bit. Is this the case? Answer
Conventional wisdom is that 32 bit Operating...
Started by Mark_Lenovo on
, 1 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at lenovo):
|
|
Version
Limit on
x64 Limit on
IA64 Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter
2 TB Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise
2 TB Windows Server 2008 R2 for Itanium-Based Systems
2 TB Windows Server 2008 R2 Foundation
8 GB Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard
32 GB Windows...
Started by erik on
, 1 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at lenovo):
|
|
Are there any filename or path length limits on Linux?
Started by ro on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at serverfault):
Those....
And for the sake of saving time (and anchoring it to memory):
ext2, ext3, ext4, zfs: no pathname limits; 255http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems
See the section called "limits bytes filename limit.
|
|
I'm running Win 7 32-bit with 2 GB memory in my system, considering upgrading to 4 GB. I've read that the 32-bit ver will only utilize 2.5 to 3.6 GB memory maximum. If my system will only utilize 2.5 GB memory, an upgrade wouldn't really be worth it, ...
Started by hcour on
, 10 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at sevenforums):
Having said that, I'm not sure how you can determine in advance how much of the 4GB, you could open Device Manager and (with a ... .
A Guy Some of the memory (even main memory.
In general, you will get the benifit of upgrading to 4GB of ram .
|
|
Hi Guys, I've noticed a lot of people really hitting the memory overclock hard on these cards. I posted earlier about how high I'd clocked mine but I wanted to get some feedback on how far people are getting. W1zzard posted 1890 clocked memory on the ...
Started by cmaxvt on
, 10 posts
by 2 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at techpowerup):
Cool that the memory is slightly slower....
Its really not worth the effort to figure it out IMO .
It does help though it at 200Mhz+ and call it a day on the memory.
Overclocking the memory has little effect compared to the core really...
|
|
A customer recently asked us: If AMP requires a 32-bit version of CentOS or RHEL, how do you use more than 4GB of memory?
A: We use a version of the Linux kernel that is able to address up to 64GB of RAM using a feature of x86 CPUs called Physical Address...
Started by dancomfort on
, 4 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at arubanetworks):
Linux is pretty good at using available ....
That would make things faster, would.
Do you have any plans to go to a 64-bit kernel? Then, you could conceivably put enough memory into a machine and run the entire PostgreSQL database in-memory.
|
