Omgili - forum search, search forums  
  

Discussions about prohibit unions from making political contributions violates

Displaying 1 - 10 out of 812 discussions.  
RSS Feed Options
Time Frame: (Any time)   Minimum number of replies: (2)   Minimum number of discussing users: (0)
  |  

Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  
Keep this page open to be updated with the newest discussions automatically.
It's about time someone put a stop to public employees unions dominating governments. Now if we could only get this in California. Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/02/th...#ixzz1lHm6V1sT Quote: : On Wednesday the Arizona Senate Government Reform...
Started by on , 28 posts by 16 people.  
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at calguns):
I'm really: : Union dominance....
The money or how the union bosses spend it.
Maximum limit for corporations, lobby groups, and individuals: $1,000 (not adjusted for inflation and tax deductable). Lobbying groups would be Everything that is wrong with the world today is that corporations, lobbying groups, and wealthy individuals...
Started by on , 12 posts by 7 people.  
Just an idea Originally Posted by Feral To view links or imagesI am assuming you... .
Of political contributions and the allowable scope for lobby groups to be involved in the political, like political parties and unions.
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:16:47 +0200, PL <pl.nospam@pandora.be Cuba Population: 11,400,000 / Capital: Havana ILO Core Conventions Ratified: 29 - 87 - 98 - 100 - 105 - 111 - 138 The same labour standards remain in force in Cuba. Workers can only ...
Started by on , 5 posts by 2 people.  
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Recognises the right to organise, but trade union organisations must also play a political role paragraphs that make up article 16 of the Labour Code, setting out the rights of trade unions and the CTC, only two can be interpreted....
Ask your Facebook Friends
An apparent major blunder by Obama. Catholics plan counterattack on new contraception coverage Church vows to use courts and legislation to fight 'un-American' requirement for religious employers to provide contraception to workers with government-required...
Started by on , 13 posts by 6 people.  
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at atimes):
I guess Obama does not need the Catholic votes is unrealistic... .
It is about making a Church give up its beliefs.
I guess Obama does not need the Catholic votes contraception .
It is about making a Church give up its beliefs.
Contraception.
ALWAYS LATE but worth the wait. Remove this ad Hooray! 22 people have given half the money. 22 citizens, United in deciding the elections. 90 people control 80% of the funding - thank God corporations are people. Among nine super PACs that raised at least...
Started by on , 21 posts by 8 people.  
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at yuku):
I didn't mean to imply that they were identical to make ....
I didn't mean to imply that they were identical in every way their First Amendment rights to make political speech.
Amendment rights to make political speech.
Then check on the suit the RNC is filing to allow direct corporate funding of campaigns. Quote: : Republican National Committee Files Brief Seeking To Allow Corporate Funding Of Campaigns By Ian Millhiser on Jan 11, 2012 at 9:58 am One of the few remaining...
Started by on , 17 posts by 6 people.  
EDIT: The next time, corporations are currently prohibited from making limited campaign contributions to political as they....
Or than individuals, all of which are permitted to make political contributions.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at reddit):
I think more than half Refuses to Deny That Government ... .
And it’s so racist, too.
Liberty Defined”, I explain in it more detail , but basically I make the argument for, uh, against penalty, and 68 percent of the time they make mistakes.
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 08:59:48 -0700, slide <dryadsdadxx@xxyahxxoo.com No. Union PAC contributions to political causes are protected speech but the source of the funds the PAC gets are a different matter. IIRC, McConnell v. FEC and others limit...
Started by on , 11 posts by 4 people.  
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
The fair share....
So the union dues.
Courts) for a person to be forced into political contributions to gain employment.
Of union membership, then employment would be dependent upon making contributions to a PAC.
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:32:47 -0800 (PST), Timothy Horrigan <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu I suppose the Supreme Court could strip political fundraising of all First Amendment protection... but of course they would have to argue that their judgment...
Started by on , 11 posts by 5 people.  
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
So the union dues are split into full (includes contribution....
Union PAC contributions to political causes are protected speech but the source of the funds into political contributions to gain employment.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at reddit):
Why make a point when you can just appeal accept my lifestyle, even though....
That's a quite obvious double standard you're making there, let me and liberty freedom liberty liberty liberty etc.
These are not rights a state could take away.
Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  

Related Message Boards & Forums

  • Politics
  • Buckyville
  • Politics and Current Events - INTJ
  • Asia Times Online • Current Events
  • The "off topic" discussion lounge - Calguns.net
More Information


Forum Search About Omgili Help Plugins Forum/Board Owners Privacy

i
In Title
In Topic
In Reply
Exclude
Boost