|
I was trying to solve a problem, but found a different solution. however out of curiosity like to know if the following is possible:
template< class > struct S; template< > struct S< Foo > : struct< Foo > {};
I would like to be...
Started by aaa on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
One possible solution was to add second template parameter, say bool specialized, such that the default is false, and specialized template has that parameter is true.however that makes things a bit messy since instantiation needs to specify....
|
|
Consider the following code:
template <int dim> struct vec { vec normalize(); }; template <> struct vec<3> { vec cross_product(const vec& second); vec normalize(); }; template <int dim> vec<dim> vec<dim>::normalize(...
Started by da_code_monkey on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Alternatively, you can define your generic implementations outside of the classes to the template version void without_params() { // delegate this->without_params<dim>.
The "generic" version.
|
|
Okay, sample code first; this is my attempt at communicating what it is that I'm trying to do, although it doesn't compile:
#include <iostream> template <class T> class Base { public: virtual void my_callback() = 0; }; class Derived1 : public...
Started by Narfanator on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Yes, you can make this work:
#include <iostream> using namespace std; template <class T> class Base { public: virtual void my_callback() = 0; }; class Derived1 : public Base<int>, public Base<float> { public: void Base<int>... .
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
I am new to Mercurial. Just cannot find the right command. Tried update/checkout with no luck. I am using local repository. Thanks
Started by Codism on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
You can update to an earlier version, make.
Then you can have the previous known good version of your file and the old version to compare side something in Mercurial that is impossible in Subversion.
|
|
Why do we need to be fed "Canadianized" versions of US speciality channels like MTV, Animal Planet, Discovery, E!, etcetera? It's not like there's anything particularly Canadian about them anyway, just a few programs to meet Cancon requirements, and the...
Started by Simsub_hater on
, 15 posts
by 9 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at viewers):
Peachtree TV version of E!, but CanWest launched E! Canada and consequently Star! has nothing much to offer thing to keep a Canadian version of a US ....
Has been licensed in Canada before the Canadianized version started popping up.
|
|
I want to add an additional conversion operator to a specialization of a template
-can a spelcialization inherit all methods from its main template ?
template<class T> MyClass { public: operator Foo() { return(getAFoo()); } }; template<> MyClass...
Started by Peter Kennard on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
You //only need to duplicate.
Is the "vanilla" version the MyClass template for type Bar.
|
|
I have a class template nested inside another template. Partially specializing it is easy: I just declare another template< … > block inside its parent.
However, I need another partial specialization that happens to specify all its local template...
Started by Potatoswatter on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Specialized version called\n"; } //void fun(); }; public: B<X> b; }; template<typename X> template<typename Y> void A<X>::B<Y>::fun() { cout << "templated version.
|
|
Joy- Hello (Special Version 2010) [Flac]
INFO
Artist : Joy
Album : Hello (Special Version 2010)
Year : 2010
Genre : Dance
Format : Flac (Image, cue, log)
Track list
01. Hello
02. Touch By Touch
03. Cheek To Cheek
04. Fire In The Night
05. Valerie
06. ...
Started by lovelion333 on
, 1 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at balcanw):
|
|
I'm developing an open source application called GarlicSim .
Up to now I've been developing it only for Python 2.6. It seems not to work on any other version.
I decided it's important to produce versions of it that will support other versions of Python...
Started by cool-RR on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
I've managed to keep one version of pyparsing for all, you can still come up with a cross....
Python 3 should away without having a separate branch for Py3 .
It will be less work for you in the long run to use the 2.4 version for 2.5 and 2.6.
|
|
I just finished a Django app that I want to get some outside user feedback on. I'd like to launch one version and then fork a private version so I can incorporate feedback and add more features. I'm planning to do lots of small iterations of this process...
Started by RexE on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
3) Merge features....
You turn those changes live.
Then your-site.com would always update to trunk which is the current latest, shipping version.
You would typically use version control, and have two domains: your-site.com and test.your-site.com.
|
