|
I was trying to solve a problem, but found a different solution. however out of curiosity like to know if the following is possible:
template< class > struct S; template< > struct S< Foo > : struct< Foo > {};
I would like to be...
Started by aaa on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
One possible solution was to add second template parameter, say bool specialized, such that the default is false, and specialized template has that parameter is true.however that makes things a bit messy since instantiation needs to specify....
|
|
Consider the following code:
template <int dim> struct vec { vec normalize(); }; template <> struct vec<3> { vec cross_product(const vec& second); vec normalize(); }; template <int dim> vec<dim> vec<dim>::normalize(...
Started by da_code_monkey on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Alternatively, you can define your generic implementations outside of the classes to the template version void without_params() { // delegate this->without_params<dim>.
The "generic" version.
|
|
Okay, sample code first; this is my attempt at communicating what it is that I'm trying to do, although it doesn't compile:
#include <iostream> template <class T> class Base { public: virtual void my_callback() = 0; }; class Derived1 : public...
Started by Narfanator on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Yes, you can make this work:
#include <iostream> using namespace std; template <class T> class Base { public: virtual void my_callback() = 0; }; class Derived1 : public Base<int>, public Base<float> { public: void Base<int>... .
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
Like title says im looking for some addon (if there is any) that gives me a stripped down version of actionbutton, not that button with huge ugly artwork around. Im using BT4 atm si if anyone knows how to get ridd of the artwork around the button or an...
Started by Deemaxm on
, 11 posts
by 10 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at mmo-champion):
Im using BT4 atm si.
Down version of actionbutton, not that button with huge ugly artwork around.
|
|
1Addicts members,
Right now for a limited time we are having a special on the Version 2 BMW Performance Electronic Steering Wheel. The Steering Wheel is an all new design and has a variety of new features.
Material
- Fully wrapped in premium quality Alcantara...
Started by ReevesBMW on
, 12 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at 1addicts):
PM me if your interested price plz.
Still offering the special for the new to 11413 We are still offering the special.
Thanks for the orders guys, we appreciate the business.
Today.
|
|
Updated 10/12/2011:
Started by BeastX on
, 29 posts
by 24 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at onesixthwarriors):
Normal version of the IM range, I just enjoy looking at....
You gotta be kidding, i just bought HT war machine .
A unique boost...
Everyone has??? AS this sounds like a special limited version (being for milk magazine and all Milk Mag.
|
|
I want to add an additional conversion operator to a specialization of a template
-can a spelcialization inherit all methods from its main template ?
template<class T> MyClass { public: operator Foo() { return(getAFoo()); } }; template<> MyClass...
Started by Peter Kennard on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
You //only need to duplicate.
Is the "vanilla" version the MyClass template for type Bar.
|
|
I have a class template nested inside another template. Partially specializing it is easy: I just declare another template< … > block inside its parent.
However, I need another partial specialization that happens to specify all its local template...
Started by Potatoswatter on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Specialized version called\n"; } //void fun(); }; public: B<X> b; }; template<typename X> template<typename Y> void A<X>::B<Y>::fun() { cout << "templated version.
|
|
Hello. which router to buy to use the special version? need for bandwidth control
I looked in the tables but do not understand (sorry)
I have about 20 machines on the network
my dir300 with special version no longer supports my network
Thank you
Started by hirohd on
, 4 posts
by 2 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at dd-wrt):
|
|
I'm developing an open source application called GarlicSim .
Up to now I've been developing it only for Python 2.6. It seems not to work on any other version.
I decided it's important to produce versions of it that will support other versions of Python...
Started by cool-RR on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
I've managed to keep one version of pyparsing for all, you can still come up with a cross....
Python 3 should away without having a separate branch for Py3 .
It will be less work for you in the long run to use the 2.4 version for 2.5 and 2.6.
|
