|
On Sat, 30 May 2009 12:31:22 -0700 (PDT), Lantern <lantern01@peoplepc.com
Whatever happened to the plan to auction off banks' toxic assets? Yes,
I know they are called "Legacy Assets" now. The last I heard the
deadline for submittal of applications...
Started by Lantern on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
It turned out to be too hard to work out what assets were toxic and which.
Going to be auctioned off.
|
|
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:56:13 -0700 (PDT), "PJ O'Donovan" <pjdnvn505@gmail.com
March 24, 2009
The Toxic Assets We Elected
Excerpt:
WASHINGTON -- "With the braying of 328 yahoos -- members of the House
of Representatives who voted for retroactive...
Started by PJ O'Donovan on
, 18 posts
by 12 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
toxic, non-performing assets,
just look at how former ABC reporter Maxine McKew removed former
PM.
|
|
On 11 Nov 2009 09:23:54 +1200, Roger_Nickel <rnickel@RemoveThis-actrix.co.nz
Interesting post over at the Daily Kos :-
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/10/18/14636/845
Which is based on conclusions drawn by an academic paper
http://www....
Started by Roger_Nickel on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
The valuations at the bottom level might change every day!
I used a parts .
Html/dbugen9/00000338.htm
where each asset is made up from a number of other assets, each with
its asset is kept forever.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
On Sun, 10 May 2009 09:42:32 -0700 (PDT), Too_Many_Tools <too_many_tools@yahoo.com
...nor does the Republican Party qualify for a bailout.
Laugh...laugh...laugh....
Obama not only makes a good President but the guy is damn funny.
Obama is someone...
Started by Too_Many_Tools on
, 9 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
On Sun, 10 May 2009 17:27:06 -0500, "SaPeIsMa_On_the_Road" <SaPeIsMa... .
On Sun, 10 May 2009 10:44:03 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@yahoo.com
In talk.politics.guns Too_Many_Tools <too_many_tools@yahoo.com
No big surprise there .
|
|
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:14:56 -0500, Vile Parasites Corporate Welfare Bums <bailmeout@greed.com
HOW CONVEEEEEEEEEENIENT THESE CROOKS MADE THEMSELVES INDISPENSABLE
HOW SELF SERVING OF THESE MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE TO HELP THEMSELVES
OF TAXPAYERS ...
Started by Vile Parasites Corporate Welfare Bums on
, 3 posts
by 2 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
This straight: The government (us) will buy the
toxic assets and GIVE THEM BACK to the ones who.
|
|
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:47:20 -0500, Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com
Dow up 498 points on the day, and blows through 7500, and past 7750.
Started by Ron on
, 3 posts
by 2 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Was down a few weeks back when the outline
of Toxic Assest plan was announced..
|
|
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:41:28 -0000, "William Jackson" <william.jackson@mathworks.co.uk
Can anyone explain this to me? Why would the government want to buy up the
bad debt? How is this going to benefit them in the long run?
http://news.bbc.co.uk...
Started by William Jackson on
, 7 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Unfortunately the taxpayer.
By buying
the toxic assets they hope to stop that from happening.
|
|
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:06:48 +0100, "DVH" <dvh@vhvhvhvhvh.com
Yes, this is certainly what the financial sector should be doing with
investors' money.
"Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. is sitting on enough uranium cake to make a
nuclear bomb as it...
Started by DVH on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Is anyone allowed to buy uranium? On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:20:36 -0700 (PDT), "Boedicia@isp.com" <Boedicia@isp.com
On Apr 15, 2:54 pm, Maria <oldwo...@stupidnewsreader... .
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:54:45 +0100, Maria <oldwoman@stupidnewsreader.com
Bloody hell .
|
|
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:06:58 -0800 (PST), "2.7182818284590..." <tangent1.57@gmail.com
Why did US buy preferred stocks as opposed to the toxic assets (or
common stock or bonds of the distressed financial companies)?
What was the reason(s) that ...
Started by 2.7182818284590... on
, 7 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
And that is how the bill
that Bush/Bernanke to change the stated - by Bush/
Bernanke/Paulson - intent of bill, to cover 'toxic assets'..which had
been but toxic....
They wanted the
money to go to troubled, aka toxic, assets.
|
|
So when I was 18 my mother helped me open an IRA account at the place she works. Bc she worked there I didn't have to pay a lot of fees or whatever. I contributed it to a little while but than I stopped. At work I contribute 6% to my 401k to get the 3...
Started by V8Lamb on
, 11 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at babycenter):
Perhaps this is why it is a toxic.
Don't worry about transfering at a loss because as long as you reinvest quickly in the same asset understand why your mother would care where **your** IRA is sitting.
|
