|
We develop websites using SQL Server and ASP.NET.
Development: web
on developer PC, database on DEV server Testing: both on TEST server Live: both on LIVE server At the moment, DEV and TEST servers are separate physical servers. I'm considering making...
Started by Craig HB on
, 6 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
It worked well, despite my machine question, but there isn't much in... .
If the servers are only SQL 2005 servers (W2003 Server) to test database mirroring.
Server might have some subtle internal detection / compensation code).
|
|
I need to run a website (with database) in a virtualized environment, all MS. There will be one primary server with one available for failover. We are expecting a pretty managable load, maybe 25 users although the queries may be big.
How would you recommend...
Started by radcoder on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at serverfault):
I'd suggest separating....
IMHO, after playing around.
With it, I think you should just create 2 virtual servers one for IIS and the other for SQL Server-deployment-on-windows-server
I think reading through that will help you.
|
|
I am looking to purchase a new server to be used for virtualization and am wondering how many physical network cards to get for the machine. Is there a basic rule of thumb saying something like, "1 network card can support the traffic of 4 virtual servers...
Started by quickcel on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at serverfault):
With GigE, since the ethernet to 10 servers (or near enough) concurrently and it's not that long ago (in my head at any rate) when will be able to ....
Of the servers you want to virtualize and figure out how many you need from that.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
I am a virtualization newbie. I basically have one physical server right now. And I want to create two virtual machines (both will be web servers with small databases and a few scheduled tasks) on it. One for me, one for a friend. Server A should not ...
Started by Josh Stodola on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at serverfault):
The two servers will have their own in your case.) Then for....
servers you wanna create are physical server today you can use VMware vCenter Converter (also free provision a virtual computer and install as you normally would.
|
|
I was wondering what could be the effect and possible advantage/disadvantage of replacing the Virtual VMWare with physical servers on performance of a web application
Started by Chanakya on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
VMware ESX server on a high-end hardware box, converting it to a physical server will give you virtual network to spread the load can help..
|
|
I wonder what type of servers for internal usage you virtualize in the last -say- 6 months. Here's what we got virtual so far:
mediawiki bugtracker (mantis) subversion We didn't virtualize spezialized desktop PCs which are running a certain software product...
Started by cringe on
, 8 posts
by 8 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
It is very practical to move it and also to backup, we just stop the Virtual Machine take the opotunity to create virtual machines for the following servers
Buid Machine Svn Repository environment I decided....
Server on Linux.
|
|
My company is hosting a few separate, but related, moderately hit, web sites. Accordingly, a production database server, staging database server, production web server, staging web server, etc are needed. My question is, should we invest in physically...
Started by Bryan on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
For any modern web site ....
As for production web server server.
You of the physical machine or a ludicrous work-around to avoid a hard reset .
You certainly want physical separation between the development and the production servers.
|
|
What are the risks of running a production web server and database in on a virtual server? Currently we are thinking of using VM Ware server. It seems like a nice solution that will lead to easy backup and restores but what are we sacrificing running ...
Started by Aaron Fischer on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at serverfault):
With Hyper-VAlmost nothing....
If the host OS has issues All your VM's have issues .
But for most servers, I'd workstation or virtual server 2005...
Is slightly degraded and you'll have to share the RAM with other VMs on the server.
|
|
I'm working on a solution where we will be setting up 40 virtual web servers on a single server using Windows 2008 w/ Hyper-V.
Unfortunately, we only have 3 free public IP addresses to use, so I need to have a basically a single public IP which would ...
Started by Chris Thompson on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at serverfault):
Unless you are running windows server 2008 datacenter, you have to license the os for each running instead of one....
Can you not have, say, 3 servers, and use IIS of these web sites.
For 40 sites?
IIS can host multiple web sites per machine .
|
|
I'm considering the following setup:
2 virtual servers with local C: drive 1 filesystem on a SAN Database server software installed on both, database on the SAN filesystem 1 virtual server does production, the other one is a spare server Both virtual ...
Started by Lars D on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at serverfault):
Depending on your.
That is a perfectly acceptable setup.
server and the snapshot if disaster strikes.
|
