|
Monday, June 15, 2009 - 13 Posts by 3 People
Of adopting the AGW Ridicule Method in seeking to undermine
his sources, you could devote a little time
obfuscate and shoot the messenger(s), AGW style?
--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)
--
Falcon:
fide
farce',
Account: 'individual.net', Server: 'news.individual.net', Protocol: NNTP,
Server Response
|
|
Thursday, June 04, 2009 - 13 Posts by 4 People
And present
danger are degenerating into farce.
Mind you, with the mind-buggering estimates
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:30:52 +0100, "Falcon" <falcon@invalid.net
I'm not qualified to make a judgement (and if I ...
was, I wouldn't be wasting
my time talking about it here) but I know a man who is. A man who makes it
clear that he believes...
|
|
Saturday, June 20, 2009 - 3 Posts by 2 People
Of the AGW Alarmist's Handbook: Page 1. How to Deal
with Contradictory Evidence. Now, would you like
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:16:21 +0100, "Sophistry Made Simple" <spamalamaa@yourrplace.com
"Falcon" <falcon@invalid...
netnews:7a3sdjF1scra6U1@mid.individual.net...
Excellent, panic over, it was all down to dodgy thermometers. Phew!
|
|
Monday, June 08, 2009 - 48 Posts by 5 People
It's papers by AGW advocates.
[..]
--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11
that when you do look at it seriously, climate change sceptics
(the serious ones, not the AGW Denial
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:24:09 +0100, "Sophistry Made Simple" <spamalamaa@yourrplace.com
"Falcon" <falcon@invalid....
|
|
Wednesday, June 10, 2009 - 65 Posts by 5 People
Is not papers by sceptics, it's papers by AGW advocates.
[..]
--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L
don't so that. That's why I'm
as happy to disregard, and even argue against, playground AGW deniers
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:20:08 +0100, "Sophistry Made Simple" <spamalamaa@yourrplace.com
"Falcon" <falcon@invalid...
|
|
Wednesday, November 21, 2007 - 4 Posts
You any time soon.
This farce should make you ask the bottom-line question: why did the
head
going to get you any time soon.
>
> This farce should make you ask the bottom-line question: why
time soon.
>
> > This farce should make you ask the bottom-line question: why did the
>
|
|
Wednesday, October 31, 2007 - 3 Posts
To make the huge but useless cuts in emissions it has
promised without bleeding us dry.
What a farce
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:54:35 +1100, "Bonzo" <boozoo@optusnt.com.au> wrote:
Andrew Bolt
Wednesday, October 31, ...
2007 at 06:36am
I DON'T know if global warming will destroy the earth, but it is already
frying brains.
Check out...
|
|
Tuesday, March 03, 2009 - 3 Posts by 2 People
And national government on earth
accepting AGW theory nowadays just has to be some sort of fib. ;)
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:53:52 -0600, "marcodbeast" <its@casual.com
Works for me! Hey, have James tell you about inorganic...
inorganic coal, while you
whine that every scientific organization and national government on earth
accepting AGW theory...
|
|
Tuesday, January 06, 2009 - 11 Posts by 6 People
I presume.
Ahahahahahahahah..
Not quite Loard Monckton is a walking farce... Just like you Bonzo
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:36:15 -0800 (PST), Lloyd <lparker@emory.edu
On Jan 5, 11:09 pm, "obozn" <ob...@m.com
Bonzo...
knows this is a lie, as it seems I correct him every day. The
NAS validated the hockey stick. Period. Move on.
Lie...
Related Videos:
|
|
Tuesday, January 06, 2009 - 12 Posts by 7 People
I presume.
Ahahahahahahahah..
Not quite Loard Monckton is a walking farce... Just like you Bonzo
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:09:14 +1100, "obozn" <obozn@m.com
It's as plain as day that carbon crackpots KNOW THEY ARE LYING...
1 Jan 2009
It is to some extent forgivable when people adopt extreme positions out of
misapprehension or delusion...
|
)