Omgili - forum search, search forums  
  

Discussions about application f

Displaying 1 - 10 out of 72,142 discussions.  
Time Frame: (Any time)   Minimum number of replies: (2)   Minimum number of discussing users: (0)
  |  

Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  
Keep this page open to be updated with the newest discussions automatically.
Are there any good code samples and applications - possibly something that is longer than few 100 lines - that use f#? I would like to see real life application using f# and how it compares to c#.
Started by on , 6 posts by 6 people.  
It's a large-enough.
I'm building a sample f# mvc application on the bistro project page.
Written in F#.
Possible Duplicate: What are the benefits of using C# vs F# or F# vs c#? My team is currently using C# .NET to develop enterprise applications for our company. We have a history of Winforms dev, but are now moving over toward SilverLight. My boss recently...
Started by on , 5 posts by 5 people.  
I just ordered the Manning ' Real World Functional Programming ' which does a fantastic job of explaining all of the nooks and crannies of F#, functional programming, and especially how it compares to C#, and OOP What I'm coming... .
Check out this question.
In haskell it is posible to partially apply an infix function using sections, for instance given the infix function < (less than) one can partially apply any of the function's arguments: (5 <) , (< 5) In other words, in haskell we have the following...
Started by on , 3 posts by 3 people.  
Let lsection x f y -> f x y let rsection f y x -> f x y.
Whereas I like to invent your own standards...
No, neither of those (apart from standard partial application like (=) x ).
Ask your Facebook Friends
Looking at a function in my code today, I wondered if it was possible to combine partial combination and optimisation: let foo (X:float) y1 y2 dx = y1 + (y2 - y1) * dx / X Basically, just applying a ratio - so the first three parameters are generally ...
Started by on , 4 posts by 4 people.  
Storing it explicitly outside the loop makes me hope is twice as slow as foo2, but storing the partial application outside the loop, it's 3 times faster // imagine something expensive let F....
That is, fdx is the partial application.
Is F# better than C# in scenarios where you need complete parallelism in parts of an application? My main language is C# and I am writing an app where the core functionality built on top of the app (C#) has to be and planned to be very parallel. Am I ...
Started by on , 7 posts by 7 people.  
On the flip side, there will be a lot of parallel functionality built in to the next version... .
F# is mostly free of side-effects so yes, but you wouldn't want to implement a UI in it .
I'd look at the Parallel Extensions that's being developed by Microsoft .
Lets say I have an old application which will try to load an external assembly. The old application is compiled to CLR 2. The new assembly is compiled to CLR 4. I would like to be able to run that old application inside CLR 4. I remember there was some...
Started by on , 3 posts by 3 people.  
"The <supportedRuntime> element should be used by all applications built using version 1.1 or later of the runtime." ( http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/a5dzwzc9.aspx ....
I believe you want to use supportedRuntime, not requiredRuntime.
I'd like to write an application in C which uses arrow-keys to navigate and F-keys for other functions, such as saving to a file, language selection, etc. Propably the values depend on the platform, so how could I find out which values the keys have? ...
Started by on , 6 posts by 6 people.  
Write your application using one of the X libraries and get access to 'key symbols' rather than.
Hello, When I try to load f_in_box, I'm getting the exception below: System.BadImageFormatException: Could not load file or assembly 'f_in_box__lib.dll' or one of its dependencies. is not a valid Win32 application. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800700C1)...
Started by on , 2 posts by 2 people.  
f-in-box uses flash plugin from Adobe.
Hello, The only way is to specify target platform as x86 .
I develop mainly line of business applications.No scientific operations. No complex calculations. Just tie User Interface to database. The only reason I use threading is to do some work in background and still keep UI responding. This may not be the best...
Started by on , 4 posts by 4 people.  
Also, F# Interactive....
On the plus side, dealing with threading should be relatively painless - F# async workflows are a huge benefit .
That's a very hard question to answer - I think that F# would make some aspects of your life much easier and some a bit harder .
I am translating a C# project into F#. While the logic part is easy, I am confused with the GUI part: public partial class GomokuGUI : Form { private void GomokuGUI_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { this.Width = 500; this.Height = 550; ... this.Paint...
Started by on , 3 posts by 3 people.  
) // // 3 Configures the application and creates the window // root.RenderSystem <.
Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  

Related Message Boards & Forums

  • Stack Overflow
  • www.f-in-box.com :: .NET Edition
More Information


Forum Search About Omgili Help Plugins Forum/Board Owners Privacy

i
In Title
In Topic
In Reply
Exclude
Boost