|
Am I the only person that wants this? It seems to be something that could reasonably have been provided for any class with a public parameterless constructor. Now having to instantiate these properties inside the constructor of the class that uses them...
Started by ProfK on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Re your "for any class with a public parameterless constructor" - actually... .
There is no sign of this in C# 4.0, so you'll just have to use either a constructor or a field (and manual property implementation) .
Indeed that might be useful, but it is what it is .
|
|
I'm using Visual Studio 2008 SP1
in VB.NET, when I type ''' above a function, some automatic default XML comments appear:
''' <summary> ''' ''' </summary> ''' <remarks></remarks>
I would like this to be the following instead:
'...
Started by hamlin11 on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Check out this article....
This allowed us to write ouw own custom comment blocks with additional parameter and a good deal of the information already present .
At my last place we wrote a VBA macro to insert the remarks for us and then bound it to a hotkey .
|
|
I'm very happy that i'm allowed to release an add-on which was coded for http://www.planet-liebe.de/
This add-on will convert posted URL into it's page title autoMAGICly on your board.
Demo: http://ragtek.org/xenforo/threads/automatic-url-aliases-automatic...
Started by ragtek on
, 20 posts
by 11 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at xenforo):
Ragtek said: ↑ This add-on will convert posted ....
Ineedhelp said: ↑ Can you explain what this add on does please .
Can you explain what this add on does please.
I was expecting it in XenForo 1.1 core, but thanks you did it .
Thanks for this add-on ragtek.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
Is there any difference between the 1967 G-code 'cruise-o-matic' (with 352 FE) and the 1969 G-code 'automatic' (with 360 FE)??
I was thinking I had seen some discussion on here about this before and that the '69 (C6) is a better option. If that is the...
Started by snake on
, 11 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at fordification):
Speed automatic trans but the C4 design was not based on the MX, it used successful features.
|
|
What are the differences among static, dynamic, and automatic allocation?
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Allocated at program startup, exists for entire life of program Automatic: allocated upon entry if a form of allocation is supported, there are restrictions such as allowing automatic allocation.
|
|
Is there a way to initialize virtual automatic property without using a constructor ? or should i just make a private field ?
Started by Yassir on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
In the case of a virtual automatic property, I would say that the initialization part makes this a problem, and would remove the "automatic....
Note that there will be plenty of cases where automatic properties makes little or no sense.
|
|
Is there a way Generate C# automatic properties with Codedom or maybe an other set of libreries that i can use ?
Started by Yassir on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
No, it's not: C# CodeDom Automatic Property
Take a look into this article to get some useful.
|
|
I find a interest thing: when I used a Browse button to choose a file , if the file have exist , the NSAlert will cause a alter panel automatic, but I want to make this by my self , how to disable the NSAlert's alter panel automatic? Thanks a lot!
Started by jin on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
However, I warn you that you better have a good reason for overriding it otherwise there will be plenty of puzzled/irritated... .
Returning nil will suppress the standard panel.
You need to implement the -panel:userEnteredFilename:confirmed: delegate method.
|
|
If both get and set are compulsory in C# automatic properties, why do I have to bother specifying "get; set;" at all?
Started by Ben Aston on
, 9 posts
by 9 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Because....
Because you might want a read-only property:
public int Foo { get; private set; }
Or Write-only:
public int Foo { private get; set; }
The compiler needs to know if you want it to generate a getter and/or a setter, or perhaps are declaring a field .
|
|
Is there a way to do this with automatic properties ?
private IList<string> List; public IList<String> list { get { return List.ToList().AsReadOnly(); } set { List = value; } }
Started by Yassir on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Automatic properties do little more than wrap simple return and assignment.
No there is not.
|
