|
Hey,
After the user fills my backing bean with info through the forms, I want to process the instance in Java code (such as JAXB marshalling).
So at the moment i'm doing this like so:
<% OtherBean.method(myBackingBean); %>
which is - if i'm right...
Started by wheelie on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
And configure.
You could have one backing bean as an instance variable of the other bean.
|
|
Was listening to an old 1976 mix tape I made years ago and reflected that Brad Delp of Boston and Phil Lynott of Thin Lizzy did all lead and backing vocals on their albums, which meant that in concert the other band members had to step in and their backing...
Started by Gentle Giant on
, 15 posts
by 10 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stevehoffman):
The OP was looking for singers who....
When Adrian.
Adrian Smith is quite a good singer.
That in studio form have bombastic, layered vocals during the chorus don't even have backing vox live some shaky backing vocals on the tapes I've heard.
|
|
Simple question: does an abstract property create a private backing field? Example:
public abstract Name { get; set; }
Will this create a private backing field? I want to force any class that derives this property to use their own backing field, not one...
Started by Daniel T. on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
On the other hand a virtual property ....
Abstract string TestStringAbstract { get; set; } }
As you can see only a single backing field since the property must be overridden by any child class there is no point in creating a backing field).
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
When defining properties I like to do just before property declaration, something like this
private IList<SomeType> _myList; public IEnumerable<SomeType> MyList { get { return _myList;} }
But if I place ///<summary> tag on the property...
Started by epitka on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
MyList { get { return _myList;} } private IList<SomeType> _myList;
If the backing field become less of a concern to me; I have taken to putting any explicit backing fields that I need.
|
|
I have done some reading and playing and I still have some questions I was hoping someone might answer:
So, can I use two or more backing beans in a single JSF page?
<h:intputText value="#{myFirstBean.firstProperty}" /> <h:intputText value="#...
Started by Nir Levy on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
That are related to one page into two or more backing beans is still posible.
Components that you can configure using the managed bean facility see backing beans , are a JavaServer, listeners, logic etc.
|
|
Is there a rake task for backing up the data in your database?
I already have my schema backed up, but I want to make a backup of the data. It's a small MySQL database.
Started by Maudite on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
For backing up my MySQL db, but I did write a script in Ruby to do just that for my WordPress DB.
|
|
I hope that in this post, I can get people's opinions on best practices for the interface between JSF pages and backing beans.
One thing that I never can settle on is the structure of my backing beans. Furthermore, I have never found a good article on...
Started by Zack on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
If you are practicing domain driven design, you will be tempted to include the business logic in to backing things, you might be feeling ....
It depends where are you coming from.
This is fine to have a business logic in your backing bean.
|
|
My project contains a large number of classes with properties whose backing field is marked readonly as they are only set at construction. As a matter of style, I like using auto-properties as it eliminates a lot of boilerplate code and encourages use...
Started by JadeMason on
, 6 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
In particular they would have to provide a way to set the backing field access to the backing....
But in the setter itself would still require a bit of work from C# .
The setter and go straight to the backing field in the constructor.
|
|
C# 3.0 offers us getters and setters with compiler generated backing fields - this is really great, but there are plenty of times that you still need to use a backing field.
In a perfect world (opinion), you would be able to do something like
class MyClass...
Started by sylvanaar on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
I tend to keep the backing fields together at the top, but then I do that with method variables too { _myOtherBackingField = value; } } }
If the lack of proximity bothers you, you can put the backing;} } private int _integer1 = 0;
Why?
because....
|
|
I'm using reflection to access and store properties and fields. However, to avoid having redundant data, I want to get rid of auto-implemented properties' backing fields, which are also enumerated as normal fields. Looks like these backing fields are ...
Started by Trap on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Classes the compiler annotates those automatic property backing fields with the CompilerGenerated.
|
