|
Posted 25 August 2010 - 03:24 PM
Now that DVP's joined the forum and he's shown that he's still in denial about what a terrible waste of paper Reclaiming History really is, I thought it'd be fun to detail some of the ommissions, errors and distortions...
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at ipbhost):
Oh well, at least Bugliosi didn't distort anything in regards to Cancler, did he? Let's with that which Bugliosi implied....
Ooops, seems that Bugliosi may have omitted of perjury.
To answer on the grounds of possible self incrimination.
|
|
Former prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi has a new book out, Divinity Of Doubt, in which he takes to task both theism and atheism on the way to make the case that agnosticism is the most logical and moral position to base one's philosophy of life upon.
In his...
Started by SCRawl on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stardestroyer):
Is the book actually worth reading, or is it the self-satisfying literary exercise in cognitive masturbation that it sounds like?
It's worth pointing out, also, that Richard Dawkins (among other prominent atheists) has maintained... .
Thanks for the synposis.
|
|
On 23 Dec 2008 21:09:20 -0500, Robert Harris <reharris1@yahoo.com
One of the most brilliant scientists of our time is Dr. Richard Dawkins, a
professor at Oxford who is often referred to as the world's best known
atheist, because of his hugely ...
Started by Robert Harris on
, 15 posts
by 8 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
In Bugliosi's world, the courtroom,
something....
It is
therefore not dishonest for Bugliosi.
Anything that is not present is not evidence.
In Bugliosi's world, the courtroom,
something opinion.
...@yahoo.com
This is a matter of semantics.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
On 23 Dec 2008 21:09:20 -0500, Robert Harris <reharris1@yahoo.com
One of the most brilliant scientists of our time is Dr. Richard Dawkins, a
professor at Oxford who is often referred to as the world's best known
atheist, because of his hugely ...
Started by Robert Harris on
, 16 posts
by 9 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
In Bugliosi's world, the courtroom,
something is not in evidence unless one side or the other presents for Bugliosi to say there is no evidence....
In Bugliosi's world, the courtroom,
something.
...@yahoo.com
This is a matter of semantics.
|
|
On 23 Dec 2008 21:09:20 -0500, Robert Harris <reharris1@yahoo.com
One of the most brilliant scientists of our time is Dr. Richard Dawkins, a
professor at Oxford who is often referred to as the world's best known
atheist, because of his hugely ...
Started by Robert Harris on
, 19 posts
by 10 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Anything that is not ....
In Bugliosi's world, the courtroom,
something is not in evidence.
Bugliosi is fully aware
This is a matter of semantics.
Is, that there are mountains of evidence
which
prove that Oswald could not have acted alone .
|
|
Gerald Posner and Vincent Bugliosi are both lawyers. Now, I realise
lawyers are necessary in our society. But, lets be honest, their job is to
represent the interests of their client, and present evidence in a
particular light. They are trained in ...
Started by thaliacole@hotmail.com on
, 11 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
You can carry on about what lawyers are
supposed to do all you like, the reality... .
The Bugliosi book from cover to cover? Have you
read it thoroughly enough to "closely examine" it?
Tell against him? Even Bugliosi
thought he was guilty.
|
|
On 23 Nov 2008 23:28:15 -0500, John Canal <John_member@newsguy.com
I received a phone call a while ago that I'll long remember....it was from
Vince Bugliosi. Unfortunately, he didn't call for the reason I'd hoped.
Nope, he told me he knew that...
Started by John Canal on
, 12 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
The Zapruder Film disproves that fact, out of hand." -- Vincent
Bugliosi; Radio above,
so I decided to write an....
Bugliosi
definitely wants "RH" to represent, I'm guessing that Vince would want
to correct as many of the President's head.
|
|
No, and god I hope not...Bugliosi's book on the JFK Assassination was a
new low in the field. Somehow, he wrote a book even worse than
Posner's, which seemed humanly impossible, but damned if he didn't pull
it off.
Started by lazuli777@webtv.net on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Baileynme@gmail.com
On Dec 8, 7:01 am, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net
No, and god I hope not...Bugliosi's book.
|
|
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:41:26 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus <gjjmail@aol.com
An excellent article by Pat Speer:
http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/Essay_-_Proof_the_FBI_Changed_Documents,_and_Vincent_Bugliosi_Was_Wrong
Started by Gil Jesus on
, 6 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
And Vince....
Documents,_and_Vincent_Bugliosi_Was_Wrong
PAT SPEER SAID (IN THE ABOVE ARTICLE THAT APPEARS AT MARY
WAS BUGLIOSI WRONG CONCERNING THE DATES? NOT AT ALL:
As for Pat Speer's complaint about Vincent Bugliosi (11/22/63).
|
|
On 23 Jun 2009 23:01:01 -0400, Osprey <osprey.ca@gmail.com
I nae overlook the eleven pages o' the chapter titled "Mark Lane". Along
with the transatlantic-spaced mentions of Lane in the book proper an' the
endnotes, it's a right wodgey one-percent...
Started by Osprey on
, 11 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
In ....
Bugliosi lost by a hair.
Bugliosi ran for LA County DA
twice there was a November runoff,
with Bugliosi polling 1,369,616 (49.8%) to Busch's 1,381,616 (50.2%).
Osprey...@gmail.com
You are badly confused about all of this.
|
