|
Future support for Link Canonical (meta) tag?
Thursday, February 26, 2009 - 14 Posts by 9 People @ phpBB • phpBB Discussion
By now I'm sure many webmasters have heard of the new canonical tag. It has been adopted by Google
, Yahoo, MSN (Live), and Ask.
If you're not up-to-speed, see:
- http
all, different pages of the site.
The canonical tag certainly takes away the need to use uniform
rel=”canonical" - New Google Attribute
Saturday, February 28, 2009 - 6 Posts by 5 People @ SSWT Internet Marketing • SEO - Search Engine Optimization
canonical" attribute. This attribute is used to specify a preferred domain, so that Google bots don't
Hey Guys,
Google has recently released a new type of <link> attribute. It's the rel
Hi,
I also came to know that Yahoo and MSN are also supporting this new attribute. Flimsy
RIA Web
Canonical
Monday, January 04, 2010 - 7 Posts by 5 People @ Bing - Crawling/Indexing Discussion - Bing Community
Is that only MSN bot should honor this canonical but at the same time I do not want other search
Hi,
Is it possible to place a rel=canonical on a page that can only be tracked by MSNbot and rest
looks like best option for you at the moment. Putting Canonical tag will tell Google, Yahoo and Bing...
Counting the ways that rev="canonical" hurts the Web : programming
Saturday, April 11, 2009 - 92 Posts by 52 People @ Opera tells EU that Microsoft's IE hurts the Web : programming
Assumption for this article is wrong: Google (and others) only honor the rev="canonical" attribute
about re l ="canonical", which Google supports. It's talking about re v ="canonical" , something
A place for all things programming.
Before making a self-post in /r/programming, please check the programming.reddit FAQ ...
Have you heard about rel="canonical"?
Tuesday, April 14, 2009 - 3 Posts by 2 People @ Promotion & SEO - sWG community
canonical" attribute. This attribute is used to specify a preferred domain, so that Google bots don't
Hey Guys,
Google has recently released a new type of <link> attribute. It's the rel
that are posting on multiple forums with same post only. Hi,
I also came across that Yahoo, MSN and few other...
Rel=canonical" - New Google Attribute
Thursday, February 19, 2009 - 4 Posts by 3 People @ Search Engine Optimization - Small Business Ideas
canonical" attribute. This attribute is used to specify a preferred domain, so that Google bots don't
Hey Guys,
Google has recently released a new type of <link> attribute. It's the rel
Thanks for the useful information Hey,
I read that Yahoo and MSN are also supporting to this new
rel="canonical" - New Google Attribute
Tuesday, February 24, 2009 - 5 Posts by 4 People @ Search Engine Optimization - Site Owners Webmaster
canonical" attribute. This attribute is used to specify a preferred domain, so that Google bots don't
Hey Guys,
Google has recently released a new type of <link> attribute. It's the rel
Hi Guys,
I also came to know that Yahoo and MSN are also supporting this new attribute. Hi,
Thanks
MSN and Live Search with .us and .info sites
Thursday, April 23, 2009 - 3 Posts by 2 People @ Web Design Talk - Search Engines
By MSN, while all of my 50+ .com sites have. The .us and .info sites HAVE been indexed by Google
Has anyone been successful in getting their .us or .info (or any non-.com) sites indexed in MSN
Crawling
MSN used to really dislike sites with canonical issues (same page referenced in multiple ways
Google says I've no backlinks but...
Sunday, November 01, 2009 - 21 Posts by 18 People @ Search Engine Optimization - SitePoint
According to statbrain I have no inbound links from google yet from yahoo I have 74 and 80 from altavista...
...why is this? Purely a case of google not crawling my site or any of the other sites that yahoo
from yahoo I have 74 and 80 from altavista I fully agree with CBP and Canonical:
1. link operator
Google search listing drop. Any ideas??
Thursday, June 05, 2008 - 15 Posts by 7 People @ Search Engine Optimization - Page 88 - SitePoint
Page (#1 in some cases) for the most common Google search terms for my site. Now I've dropped
.com site.
What kills me is that MSN, Yahoo, Ask.com, etc. still list me very very highly.
Yahoo
in Google. However, without seeing the site in question, I really cannot say for sure. Quote: : Schulz Hi
|
)