Omgili - forum search, search forums  
  

Discussions about count

Displaying 1 - 10 out of 811,427 discussions.  
RSS Feed Options
Time Frame: (Any time)   Minimum number of replies: (2)   Minimum number of discussing users: (0)
  |  

Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  
Keep this page open to be updated with the newest discussions automatically.
I have the following code: SELECT <column>, count(*) FROM <table> GROUP BY <column> HAVING COUNT(*) > 1; Is there any difference to the results or performance if I replace the COUNT(*) with COUNT('x')? (This question is related to...
Started by on , 6 posts by 6 people.  
Select count(*) from table I'm not sure question, it was asked what....
The-difference-between-countcolumn-and-count The major performance difference is that COUNT(*) can will return immediately, without needing to examine any rows.
I have the following query: select column_name, count(column_name) from table group by column_name having count(column_name) > 1; What would be the difference if I replaced all calls to count(column_name) to count(*) ? This question was inspired by...
Started by on , 6 posts by 6 people.  
count(*) counts NULLs and count(column) does not [edit] added this code so that people can run) insert #bla values(null,null) select count(*),count(id),count(id2) from #bla results 7 3 2 To clarify SQLMenace'....
After reading the docs, it seems the the function sqlite3_column_count does all the same, but doesn't have the restrictions that sqlite3_data_count has. Why would I ever want to use sqlite3_data_count over sqlite3_column_count? thanks!
Started by on , 3 posts by 3 people.  
*/....
Sqlite3_column_count on the other hand, returns always the number in the result set for the statement pStmt.
With no results it returns 0.
Sqlite3_data_count returns the number of values (columns) of the currently executing statement.
Ask your Facebook Friends
Count up and count down seems no difference, we can implement either one as we like. But actually what is the advantage for using count up and count down. what is the difference between them (besides that one is increment, another one is decrement)?
Started by on , 6 posts by 6 people.  
If you don't know where the end is, then count-up....
On the other hand, count up also works perfectly well, with the current count telling you how much you've done.
The current count tells you how many there are left to do.
I use Count function to get the total number or rows from a table... Is there any difference between the two following statements? Select Count(*) from Table and select Count(Id) from Table Is there a difference between execution times...
Started by on , 4 posts by 4 people.  
count(id) needs to null-check the column (which may be optimized away for a primary key or otherwise not-null column), so count(*) or count(1) should be prefered (unless you really want to know the number of rows with a non-null value....
Is there a difference between the following queries, assuming there is a primary field 'id' in the table (as in speed, etc)? SELECT COUNT(id) FROM table vs. SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table
Started by on , 6 posts by 6 people.  
Have a look at Count(*) vs ....
But in for example PostgreSQL the COUNT(pkcolumnname) is much faster.
Not in MySQL, no, it has optimized the COUNT well (assuming that your id field is already a PK --which is fairly self-describing).
I thought LINQ to SQL was tuned for performance? The following LINQ to SQL for counting is very poor Dim uniqueFactors As Integer = db.LargeTable.Distinct.Count produces: SELECT COUNT(*) AS [value] FROM [dbo].[LargeTable] AS [t0] WHERE ([t0].[ID] % @p...
Started by on , 4 posts by 4 people.  
Since....
Selecting a rows from sysindexes (or preferably normal TSQL that perfoms ok.. .
The SELECT COUNT(*) is the only way SQL Server (and therefore LINQ) can give you an exact, up-to-date count of the rows in the table.
For larger tables.
Most recent counts... June Count 2010 That '70s Show (4130 | 137.67) Ranked #48 out of 207 July Count 2010 That '70s Show (9141 | 294.87) Ranked #26 out of 210 August Count 2010 That '70s Show (2378 | 76.71) Ranked #83 out of 213 September Count 2010 ...
Started by on , 15 posts by 4 people.  
No more post-count no subtitle! Yes, let's move our shenanigans....
Ok d'ok.
Thanks guys and gals Aye, captain! Sorry about that.
As much as I appreciate the 30+ plus posts in the last post count thread, please put all OT topics threads all turn OT.
CREATE TABLE `names` ( `name` varchar(20) ); Assume the "names" table contains all 40 million first names of everyone living in California (for example). SELECT count(*) as count, name FROM names GROUP BY name ORDER BY name; How can I optimize this query...
Started by on , 3 posts by 3 people.  
Do you actually have a bottleneck....
Well, what makes you think it's not already optimised? This looks like the sort of query a good database engine should be able to handle relatively easily - particularly if you've got an appropriate index on your table .
Hi, just wondering if any of you guys use Count(1) over Count(*) and if there is a noticeable difference for SQL Server 2005 in performance? Or is this just a legacy habit that has been brought forward from days gone past?
Started by on , 9 posts by 9 people.  
Select count(1) What is the difference....
Had these URLs, which may help: select count(*) vs.
That said, I've always used COUNT(*) .
There is no point in loading the DB engine with more work if you're .
I prefer using COUNT (1).
Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  

Related Message Boards & Forums

  • Stack Overflow
  • TV Shows: Past - Fan
Related Searches
word count    Counting    mssql count    ESR count    platelet count 18    D80 Shutter Count    ESR Count in blood    if SELECT COUNt FROM mysql    VBA Word Count    initWithObjects count   
More Information


Forum Search About Omgili Help Plugins Forum/Board Owners Privacy

i
In Title
In Topic
In Reply
Exclude
Boost