|
Dangerous Music Introduces THE DANGEROUS LIAISON PURE ANALOG ROUTING UNDER DIGITAL CONTROL: INSTANT GRATIFICATION -6 Stereo Insert Loops, Assignable to 2 Stereo Busses
-Flexible and Potent Parallel Processing Loop
-Route, Switch, Matrix, Flip & Audition...
Started by The Press Desk at Gearslutz.com on
, 12 posts
by 10 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at gearslutz):
No?
Because for me it is; especially from....
This is f'ing ridiculous! Quote...
Bob and Marek from Dangerous Music brought one of the " Dangerous Liaisons " by a couple of weeks Dangerous!!
Scott
Play what serves the song, not yourself.
|
|
Is using of threads dangerous? If yes, why? How can I use threads safely?
Started by masoud ramezani on
, 6 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Using an awful lot - sharing immutable data is significantly... .
If yes, why?
You need carelessly is dangerous - particularly as it's easy to end up with code which "works for me".
Is using of threads dangerous?
It depends on how you are using them.
|
|
How dangerous is it to interrupt an fsck?
Has anyone had any direct experience doing this?
Started by Runcible on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at serverfault):
%s for device %s exited with signal %d.
Actually, I can offer some assurance: strings /sbin/fsck | grep sig reports:
sigaction Warning.. .
I don't have any direct knowledge or evidence, but to me, it would just be plain EVIL to not handle SIGINT .
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
Are pipes considered dangerous to use in Windows, from a security standpoint?
Started by Brian R. Bondy on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
I don't know exactly how they are implemented in Windows, but I would expect that pipes between processes/threads on the... .
If you are concerned about network sniffing, I suppose they could be since I don't think that pipes between systems are encrypted .
|
|
Posted Today, 11:56 AM
http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gNaVQCblZbs
Started by maknae_july on
, 20 posts
by 14 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at 6theory):
SNSD will never see any of the 'dangerous boys
sectiondotty, on 29 January 2012 - 12:22 PM, said:
SNSD will never see any of the 'dangerous boys' every:
SNSD will never see any of the....
Still helped him even though he gave up on the show .
|
|
Http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/artic ... d=10780605
NZ is having an awful spate of dog attacks on children at the moment - three in the last week and something like one per week for a few weeks before that. The vast majority of the attacks (possibly...
Started by Dropbear1 on
, 12 posts
by 8 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at maternal):
Proper training and....
We have family that has 2 staffys and 2 maltese terriers, and the maltest terriers are the ones that need to be watched.. .
Personally, i think it comes down to the particular dog and its temperament (not its breed) and its owners... .
|
|
When I try to compile C code that uses the gets function, I get a warning: warning: the gets function is dangerous and should not be used.
I remember this has to do something with stack protection and security, but I'm not sure. Can someone help me with...
Started by vinit dhatrak on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Instead of using gets , you want to....
You will only know that if you know exactly what data you will be reading .
In order to use gets safely, you have to know exactly how many characters that you will be reading so you can make your buffer large enough .
|
|
We are running multiple Sitecore websites and just got feedback that it might be dangerous to have stacktraces available to users of the website when getting errors. Will the website be alot more vulnarable to hackers now that people get stacktraces?
Started by Younes on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Would show that user is stored in the session)
only the stack trace is usally not that dangerous.
|
|
Hello!
How can I suppress following warning from gcc linker:
warning: the use of mktemp' is dangerous, better use mkstemp'
I do know that it's better to use mkstemp() but for some reason I have to use mktemp() function.
Started by Konstantin on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Why do you have to use mktemp ?
If you are statically linking the runtime, then the other option is... .
If you have to use mktemp then there is not anything you can do to suppress that warning short of removing the section that uses mktemp from libc.so.6 .
|
|
My co-workers (who worked with the company longer than I have) loves to remove their laptop's power cord when they need to move around the office.
I frown on this practice since they usually don't remove the power brick from the power socket. I've told...
Started by MrValdez on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at superuser):
Can I flip...) Is it the energy waste? (~1....
Dangerous - probably not, except as a trip hazard.
This around and ask why you think it is dangerous?
Is it the danger of it bursting into flames it remain warm even when not connected.
|
