|
I have a project that I am in the process of migrating to using Linq To SQL. On the whole it's fine, but I'm stuck on an issue where if I try to put a timestamp from an DTO into a hidden field I get this error at runtime:
BC30652: Reference required to...
Started by ilivewithian on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
You can add it to the web.config
<compilation debug="true....
Do all of your projects have a reference to that assembly?
Is the version correct?
Are you separating you logic in an different assembly? If so then you must reference it in the web app also .
|
|
Hi,
I have a specific set of binaries installed at:
~/.GutenMark/binary/<binaries...>
These were previously working correctly, but for seemingly no reason when I attempt to execute them the shell claims not to find them:
james@anubis:~/.GutenMark...
Started by eegg on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at superuser):
Are you are trying....
Is GutenMark (at 76592 bytes) not actually a binary , but a script starting with a !# line which defines the program which executes the script?
If that line defined a non-existent program, you would see a 'not found' error message .
|
|
I've read conflicting opinions as to whether every BeginInvoke() has to be matched by an EndInvoke(). Are there any leaks or other problems associated with NOT calling EndInvoke()?
Started by endian on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Necessary - else leaks happen) - from msdn :
Important Note
No matter which technique you use, always call EndInvoke to complete your asynchronous... .
More info here
Delegate.EndInvoke is documented as a though shalt call this (i.e .
EndInvoke is not optional.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
I have a really vague problem, but I hope someone can help with it. I was modifying a C++ project and yesterday it was still working, but today it's not. I'm pretty sure I didn't change anything, but to be completely sure I checked the project out from...
Started by Jordi on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Also, try....
Are you actually using __declspec(dllexport) ? My guess is no -- without that declaration, that function will not be exported by the DLL (or in other words, programs loading that DLL will not have access to functions without that declaration) .
|
|
I recently added a control library project to my Silverlight app's solution, so the solution now has three projects:
SLClient SLClient.Controls SLClient.Web SLClient has a project reference to SLClient.Controls, which contains the following:
Themes Generic...
Started by Dov on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Build Re-add the XAML xmlns reference Rebuild HTH,
Mark
If you have added references... .
Clean and rebuild all the projects Re-add the project reference .
Try this:
Delete the reference in the project and the xmlns ref in the XAML .
Sounds like a hokey reference.
|
|
I have a class that calls
traceback.extract_stack()
in its __init__() , but whenever I do that, the value of traceback.extract_stack() is [] .
What are some reasons that this could be the case? Is there another way to get a traceback that will be more...
Started by Josh Gibson on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Please....
Following shows traceback.extract_stack() working when called from a class's __init__ method .
Looking at the code for the traceback module, one possibility is that you've got sys.tracebacklimit set to zero, though that seems like a longshot.. .
|
|
This is probably a stupid question, but...
I've got an application that sends emails out, programmatically. The emails have two recipients. One in the TO field (my client), and one in the BCC field (me).
I'm getting the emails, and I see my client's address...
Started by seth on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
For instance, try to email xalalaa@aeihiaghjaerhgkjahegh.com, which I suppose is non-existant, and put yourself on BCC .
The To is only a header.
Have they checked their spam filter?
No, it doesn't.
It should as long as it's the right e-mail address .
|
|
Su-30MK2 with a fully AA loadout, something you definitely don't see often.
Started by HAIDER on
, 11 posts
by 9 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at defence):
Re: Su-30MK2 with....
Gubbi thanked this.
Re: Su-30MK2 with a fully AA loadout, something you definitely don't see of It's an F-111.
Re: Su-30MK2 with a fully AA loadout, something you definitely don't see of The first picture is of an SU-34.
|
|
Demba Ba DEFINITELY the better choice than Gameiro
Started by Cheik the room on
, 20 posts
by 10 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at not606):
To then we should definitely go after him I've got reservations about Ba to be honest definitely go after him Sorry lads but there's quite a large que at the moment BASTARD EVIL KNIGHT with the 'definitely' better choice, the fact....
|
|
CARDINALS definitely on the downswing they will be luckless next year.
Started by nchusker on
, 16 posts
by 10 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at huskermax):
Church and state are, and must remain, separate....
Why such negativity? We lost recruits to USC and UCLA to -- care to take a crack at them? Cardinal s ? "We establish no religion in this country, we command no worship, we mandate no belief, nor will we ever .
|
