|
Hey Rob and Jon,
Just out of curiosity, have you heard of this?:
http://www.propellerheads.se/news/rackextensions/index.cfm
Developers can get the SDK from propellerheads and convert their software into Reason Rack Extensions and offer their software ...
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at kvraudio):
First instrument will be Predator :)
Cheers,
Rob
This is great news regards, ----
Exode....
I have the Reason into the developer kit and start programming .
Their software into Reason Rack Extensions and offer their software to Reason users.
|
|
Real hair extensions as simple it sounds are difficult to find, especially when real human hair extensions is the issue.The fact is that when extensions are made from manufacturers that are in the hair extension wholesale field, producing them in huge...
Started by sheulibd10 on
, 1 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at thefreeadvertisingsite):
|
|
Great hair extensions The fact is that when extensions are made from manufacturers that are in the hair extension wholesale field, producing them in huge amounts to be distributing to salons all over the world.
Started by accbd9 on
, 1 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at webcosmoforums):
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
I want to use the functions exposed under the OpenGL extensions. I'm on Windows, how do I do this?
Started by Ashwin on
, 5 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
(Note that not all extensions might be supported the library....
Example needed to use the supported OpenGL extensions.
OpenGL extensions are listed in the OpenGL Extension Registry .
And the extension APIs you wish to use.
|
|
$5 / $15 / $75 - various extensions, great buys inside! Timothy.mobi etc over Last edited by dubstep; Today at 03:56 AM .
Started by dubstep on
, 1 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at dnforum):
|
|
Many extensions lie inactive when I'm not using them like Firebug and Xmarks . Do they add to the memory footprint while they're sleeping. I'm not talking about disabled extensions.
Coz, if they are consuming memory, I'm better off disabling some of them...
Started by detj on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at superuser):
Disable all ....
You have one great way to test which extension may be more problematic in terms of memory consumption while not being used.
Extensions with static objects or objects with static data members will consume memory too.
|
|
Does anyone know if there is a PrototypeJS library that is compatible with Firefox Extensions? I have written a JS piece of code that is 700 line in Prototype and do not want to rehash it out using JQuery which I know is reccomended for XUL Extensions...
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
What I've ended up doing....
The main reason is that there is a whole bunch of window checking happening .
JQuery can be embedded in extension (Ubiquity, for example), so it should be possible with PrototypeJS!
I've had similar problems with prototype.
|
|
If you were to define some extension [static, instance] methods, properties in an assembly written in F#, and then use that assembly in C#, would you see the defined extensions in C#?
If so, that would be so cool.
Started by Joan Venge on
, 4 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Medal!
Per the language spec , section 10.7 "Type extensions":
Optional extension members;System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Extension>] let Great(s : System.String) = "Great" // F# way type System.String with member.
|
|
Recently I asked a question about how to clean up what I considered ugly code. One recommendation was to create an Extension Method that would perform the desired function and return back what I wanted. My first thought was 'Great! How cool are Extensions...
Started by Dscoduc on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
There is an extra....
Under the hood, extension methods are called no differently than a static method.
OP] Definetely a handy way to go, but is it really worth the overhead of another class object?
No extra class object is created in this scenario .
|
|
Since reading this question , I'm wondering: What would be the Right Thing TM to do to associate a UNIX file (ie, blob of data) with a file type? We have file extensions (DOS), data/resource forks (Apple) and ... err, file extensions and file(1) (UNIX...
Started by doppelfish on
, 10 posts
by 10 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Extensions etc are conventions only; real UNIX doesn't have a mechanism that associates a file that there isn't a real need for it and that the file(1) method plus extensions conventions are good enough started using file extensions....
|
