|
I'm writing a DLL for an audio-player (foobar2000) using its SDK. My DLL links to another DLL, and I've done so using an import library (.lib). However, at run-time, the audio player complains that my DLL (the one that links to the other) is missing a...
Started by psas on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
When OS loads a DLL (and EXE, too, of course), it looks for its import table and tries to load imported.
|
|
As the title says: I've got a bunch of tab-separated text files containing data.
I know that if I use 'CREATE TABLE' statements to set up all the tables manually, I can then import them into the waiting tables, using 'load data' or 'mysqlimport'.
But ...
Started by AP257 on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Then you can export the excel.
Automatically creating tables types in the first row, why not type a proper CREATE TABLE statement.
You need to CREATE a TABLE first in any case.
No, there isn't.
|
|
Okay, so if I had a project that used:
import java.awt.Graphics; import java.awt.Graphics2D; import java.awt.Dimension; import java.awt.Font; import java.awt.Color; import java.awt.Polygon;
Would it make the Class file smaller to use:
import java.awt....
Started by William on
, 11 posts
by 11 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
No difference exactly which classes are used....
That makes your code more readable, and more maintainable.
Www.ahristov.com/tutorial/java4k-tips/java4k-tips.html
First, be sure to look at my "Import on Demand a "import foo.bar.*".
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
Would it suppose any difference regarding overhead to write an import loading all the types within one package (import java.*); than just a specific type (i.e. import java.lang.ClassLoader)? Would the second one be a more advisable way to use than the...
Started by Juan Carlos on
, 10 posts
by 10 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
However, I consider it to be a best practice....
P.A.*;
or: import P.A.B; The first of these makes available types within the class A foundThere is not a performance or overhead cost to doing import .* vs importing specific types.
|
|
I apologize in advance if this question seems remedial.
Which would be considered more efficient in Python:
Standard import
import logging try: ...some code... exception Exception, e: logging.error(e)
...or...
Contextual import
try: ...some code... exception...
Started by Huuuze on
, 6 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Changing the location of the import statement only has an effect on where the name is bound....
It depends on how often you how many times you import it.
That the first import doesn't cause any unforeseen issues in your code.
|
|
Say I only needed to use findall() from the re module, is it more efficient to do:
from re import findall
or
import re
Is there actually any difference in speed/memory usage etc?
Started by Ashy on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
When....
When you access the function as
re.findall()
python will need to first find the module in the global scope thousands of times.
There is no difference on the import, however there is a small difference on access.
The import.
|
|
I just want to output current and I wrote
import java.util.*;
at beginning, and
System.out.println(new Date());
in the main part.
But what I got was something like this: Date@124bbbf
When I change the import to import java.util.Date;
the code works perfectly...
Started by EthanZ6174 on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
There has to be something....
In you first example, do you perchance import anythingYour program should work exactly the same with either import java.util.*; or import java.util.Date; .
Either of these could not make any difference.
|
|
In Python, once I have imported a module X in an interpreter session using import X , and the module changes on the outside, I can reload the module with reload(X) . The changes then become available in my interpreter session.
I am wondering if this also...
Started by cschol on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
First off, you shouldn't be using reload at all, if you can avoid('zoo.py', 'w') f.write("snakes = ['viper....
Style guides (such as my employer's) say to never import anything except a module (this is one out follow style guide from Alex).
|
|
I've tried to find a comprehensive guide on whether it is best to use 'import module ' or 'from module import'. I've just started with Python, with the intention for developing web applications with Django, and I'm trying to start off with best practices...
Started by kRON on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
From module import ...: nice that imported items and readable, and has more than a little....
Drawback is that you'll need to qualify each reference with the module name .
import module: nice when you are using many bits from the module.
|
|
I've no idea why, but on occasion I've managed to fix some compile errors, most notably
error expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'someClass'
by moving #import "someClass.h" from the .h file into the .m file. This has also worked with a couple of...
Started by gargantaun on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
If you import A.h into B.h and import B.h into C.h , then every....
Instead, import headers incremental build times and the avoidance of circular dependencies.
Instead; that'll tell the compiler that the identifier refers to a class .
|
