|
I would like to ask you some questions about LGPL, I've used a library written on PHP with license LGPL, I had made software and I'm not license it using LGPL or GPL,
The libraries is a class' form I had modified the libraries and made a class to access...
Started by awaludin on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
The precise....
Before,
(I make my own library (non-LGPL and non-GPL), I altered the function call name so and non-GPL)
$d0->get_line($i);
Is it violated the LGPL
I make my own library (the codes not taken of the LGPL.
|
Can I legally incorporate GPL & LGPL, open-sourced software in a proprietary, closed-source project?
The company I work for develop and sell a proprietary, closed-source software application. Our application uses third party open-source projects licensed under open source licenses such as GPL and LGPL . For instance, we use Hibernate as an ORM.
Sometimes...
Started by Hans Sjunnesson on
, 22 posts
by 22 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
The former depends on many things....
With GPL, you have to release all your and distribute, though, that's the entire difference between the GPL and the LGPL.
To the LGPL items, but you don't have to release the rest of your code.
|
|
Are there any restrictions of using lgpl, gpl, bsd licensed software in a commercial venture if the tools/software are only used as part of internal processes and not integrated or incorporated into any software / product that is being sold.
i.e. if we...
Started by john ryan on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
You STILL don't have a problem with the GPL answer, other than YOU MUST ASK YOUR....
For the GPL, your requirements are to distribute the source, or make it available not dealing directly with the patent holders.
The redistribution clauses.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
I am writing code that links against an LGPL library that I've modified. What is the scope of LGPL in such case? Will I have to make my code public under LGPL?
Is it possible to keep my source code proprietary still? I have no issues with making the modified...
Started by nikhilbelsare on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
LGPL means, for libraries, you can include them in your projects (as linked libraries) without having to [L]GPL your whole code....
You can keep your code proprietary, but you must release the modifications you made to the LGPL library.
|
|
Is there a risk of legal trouble if you include GPL or LGPL licensed icons in a closed source software?
Would it force it to become open source just to include the icon?
Does it matter if the icon is compiled as a resource?
Are the creative common licensed...
Started by Joel Gauvreau on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
But any attempt to embed it will force your program to GPL, it's one of the most restrictive....
(Edit are not using GPL Code to access it.
Any GPL Code/Content that's compiled into your Application will make it GPL.
For GPL, yes.
|
|
I have ported some LGPL code from Java to C#, which I plan to release as an open source component. Do I have to release my new library under LGPL too, or can I go with something less restrictive like MS-PL?
Started by Mark Heath on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Since you're basing your work....
I believe you have to use LGPL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Lesser_General_Public_License#Differences_from_the_GPL
It depends on whether your port is a derivative work (generally port == derivative work).
|
|
If I use an lgpl licensed javascript library, do I have to release my closed source web app that is using it?
I feel like I don't have to, so long as I don't modify the source of the library.
I would like to use an lgpl javascript wysiwyg in a commercial...
Started by merlincam on
, 6 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Typically with the LGPL source available....
In one plain English "translation" , the library remains available under LGPL while your main software can be whatever license you'd like.
With LGPL no you don't (need to open the source).
|
|
I know many developers won't even touch LGPL but only use MIT or New BSD licensed libraries. But exactly HOW many?
I would use LGPL in my own projects, am I "alone" or "close to alone"...?
The platform I am most interested in knowing about it .Net developers...
Started by Thomas Hansen on
, 8 posts
by 8 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
But my understanding....
However, the code that I write/licensing issues.
I'm glad that RMS put it together.
I like the GPL.
For GPL, I would need to think long and hard.
I would use LGPL with no hesitation.
I do, I see no reason not to.
|
|
Is that possible to switch an Open Source Project license from GPL to LGPL v3 ?
I am the project originator and the only contributor.
Started by Romain Verdier on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
And anyone they licensed it on to) would be entitled to stay under the GPL - you can't change.
|
|
I'm writing a .NET library for the Stack Overflow pre-alpha API . After uploading some early code to a new project over at Google Code, I set the license info to GPL and added the appropriate license disclaimers to the code files. After posting an announcement...
Started by Maxim Z. on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
You should be aware that the LGPL creates obligations that....
LGPL is for libraries and has unintended cases) if you use LGPL -- cfr the license , specifically under point 3:
provided.
I think you should look at the BSD or MIT licenses .
|
