|
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:40:54 -0700 (PDT), samsloan <samhsloan@gmail.com
The peanut gallery has virtually ignored the decision of the
Springfield Illinois federal court but I can assure you that the
decision is of great significance. Simply stated...
Started by samsloan on
, 5 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Have you read it?
It sets forth....
Of course, his comments said was that there were no grounds for removal of the
Illinois suit from state court to federal.
Trumpets a purely procedural ruling in the Illinois
case as a great victory.
|
|
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:56:00 -0700 (PDT), jkh001 <jkh001@aim.com
I find it amusing that the Sloon deprecated the dismissal of his most
recent nut case on procedural grounds (arguing that the court should
have addressed the "merits" of his argument...
Started by jkh001 on
, 4 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Someone who would sue the USCF has
....
If Paul and Susan cannot refute
the allegations felt
aggrieved, what is the greater good? To sue USCF for tons of bucks?
One thing we have come.
It?
It sets forth the USCF's case clearly.
|
