|
Mechanization The ww2 saw many of the tecnical developments, one of those was a strong trend towards mechanization of ground forces (for the countries that could afford such thing, of course). Starting with tanks, introducing SP artillery, AAA, infantry...
Started by tomo pauk on
, 13 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at ww2aircraft):
Something else will get a budget cut at the....
Spend the money for mechanized equipment plus logistical support and you will have it.
It's just a matter of how a nation decides to spend their military budget .
Could the things be sped up? Certainly.
|
|
2011 strive to crop farming received comprehensive mechanization rate of 54 % of the agricultural ,
Recently, the Ministry of Agriculture issued a notice of 2011 annual major objectives and tasks of the National Agricultural Mechanization Development...
Started by tiggy a-lo-ha on
, 1 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at lallavilla):
|
|
Originally Posted by davebender None.
The 10.5 cm leFH 18/40 change was intended to lower production cost. A bit more range and higher rate of fire was just a bonus. Try looking at the changes from the 10.5 cm leFH 18 to the 10.5 cm leFH 18M. New shell...
Started by Shortround6 on
, 10 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at ww2aircraft):
For the 3rd time: in this thread as Mechanization and infantry....
This applies to self propelled weapons or mechanization as well.
As far as Mechanization and infantry support goes I would suggest.
Weapons or mechanization as well.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
Gun is pointed back over the engine deck That would be useless for direct fire and the 18 pounder shell is too small for effective indirect fire. You would be further ahead to install an inexpensive 120mm mortar on an outdated tank chassis.
Started by davebender on
, 8 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at ww2aircraft):
The M7 Priest and the Sexton were never intended for the direct fire... .
Yes it would be useless for direct fire but if you are using the divisional artillery assets for direct fire the situation has gone to pot in a big way and total disaster is imminent .
|
|
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:48:24 +0200, "M Winther" <mlwi@swipnet.se
Creativity, what is its driving force? It is interesting that some
people are curious and creative, while others are extremely
conservative, trying to program themselves to become ...
Started by M Winther on
, 16 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:00:52 GMT, "Marlon" <marlon@mailinator.com
Those are some pretty... .
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:32:53 -0700 (PDT), None <JoeSchmo.7@gmail.com
On Apr 21, 6:48 am, "M Winther" <m...@swipnet.se
Fascinating set of assumptions .
|
|
On Apr 26, 12:10 am, help bot <nomorech...@hotmail.com
Actually, I am just pointing out your behavior, personal and private
for a dozen years. I also see you cut the bit about being a hidden
voice on rgcc, which is possibly prudent on your part, since...
Started by onechess@comcast.net on
, 4 posts
by 2 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Of ....
Post it here if you know..
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:25:32 +1000, madams <micadams@bluesky.au
What was the hoosier's previous pseudonym? - Does anyone recall? My
memory fails me on this triviality bot it nevertheless niggles somewhat,
so pls .
|
|
On Thu, 14 May 2009 07:43:17 -0700 (PDT), "*Hemidactylus*" <ecphoric@hotmail.com
On May 14, 1:48 am, "M Winther" <m...@swipnet.seIn my worldview concepts like "autonomous spirit", "collective
unconscious", and "ego" are archaic assumptions about...
Started by *Hemidactylus* on
, 4 posts
by 2 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
On May 14, 1:48 am, "M Winther" <m...@swipnet.se
You should ... .
On Thu, 14 May 2009 20:18:13 +0200, "M Winther" <mlwi@swipnet.se
"*Hemidactylus*" <ecphoric@hotmail.comnews:f4f0f099-e8e5-4624-9c4d-b24f55a5a4c0@t10g2000vbg.googlegroups.com.. .
|
|
On Apr 22, 9:16 pm, help bot <nomorech...@hotmail.com
Well.. I hardly think that is anything he said of himself, but kelp-
not cannot be described as not reactive, and so we get:
those words in quotation marks are not actually quotations
surely ...
Started by onechess@comcast.net on
, 11 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Let this be a
lesson to you-- not to procrastinate....
IMnes imagine has claimed
that? The job of rgc petty pedant was already
filled some time ago; sorry .
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:24:54 -0700 (PDT), help bot <nomorechess@hotmail.com
Who does Dr .
|
|
Try mechanization. It's a noun that means the use of machinery to replace human or animal labor. ChaCha!
Started by Answered on
, 1 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at chacha):
|
|
I remember reading about armoured warfare concepts from the interwar years and one of them included complete mechanization of army, including giving infantry soldiers tankettes. I wonder how such a "tankette infantry" would perform.
Started by Perturabo on
, 11 posts
by 8 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at matrixgames):
AFAIK the Poles have found them quite useful, especially....
No, it does not.
Or the US Army? Does a Bradley count as a tankette, given a lack of troops and excess of firepower? No .
Or the Poles.
Or the combatants in the Spanish civil war.
Ask the Italians.
|
