|
I left the .net about 3 years back when I was working on .net 2.0. And in these three years I wasn't working on .net at all. Now, I have got a project which is in .net 3.5. But I have noticed there are a lot of technologies introduced between these two...
Started by Varun Mahajan on
, 6 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Misc : The C/C++ get a standard template libarary (STL) so that these languages can .
Of the .Net Framework.
|
|
People have been developing own solutions to the following problems:
Consistent messaging frameworks for remote information exchange (webservices,rpc,...) SDK's for state managements for things such as Finite State Machines and Workflows Authentication...
Started by Tronex on
, 15 posts
by 15 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
We still don't use it.
When a developer tries to get IT, or the Business on board with upgrading to .Net 3.5 and my company.
Developers are also notoriously bad at communicating with other departments about business value .
To .Net 3.5.
|
|
Is .NET Compact a perfect subset of .NET?
Can I write a Windows Forms application and run it on .NET Compact, assuming that I took into account screen size and other limitations and avoid classes and methods not supported by .NET Compact or is .NET Compact...
Started by Andrew J. Brehm on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Watch out for DataGrid, they are not the same.
Of the .Net framework, but close enough.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
In this question superwiren asks about the pitfalls for converting a .net 2.0 solution to .net 3.5.
What about .net 1.1 to .net 2.0?
Is 2.0 fully backwards compatible with 1.1?
Started by spinodal on
, 6 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Common conversion issues and solutions
1.1 to 2.0 compatibility....
I dont think .NET 2.0 is fully backwards compatible, though they claim it is .
I think its depends on your code, the best option is to perform a trial run and see what errors it will generate .
|
|
.NET Framework 3.5 SP1 installs the .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 and the .NET Framework 3.0 SP2 behind the scenes. These installation packages (especially .NET Framework 2.0 SP2) are not available directly from Microsoft.
Is there a way to extract them from...
Started by Michael Damatov on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Somasegar/archive/2008/05/12/visual-studio-2008-and-net-fx-3-5-sp1-beta-available-now.aspx#8515404
You.
|
|
What would be some compelling reasons to upgrade a web app from .NET 1.1 to .NET 3.5?
Started by Nick on
, 10 posts
by 10 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
But in general, it's abandoned, and as of 2.0 microsoft ensures back-compatibility in newer versions... .
I'm not sure about security issues.
.net 1.1 is deprecated, not being further developed.
Generics, lambdas, LINQ, many others that I forgot about I'm sure .
|
|
Hello,
Is it possible to convert some of the dlls of .Net framework 3.5 and use it in .Net framework 2.0?
I really need the managed named pipes namespace in .Net 2.0 :-(
Thanks
Started by Josh on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Www.danielmoth.com/Blog/2007/06/net-framework-35.html
Here's a good blog post which (along with one.
|
|
Can I develop a website which utilizes ADO .NET Entities in the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 and then deploy it on another machine with just the .NET 3.5 framework?
Started by JamesJ on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Best....
Normally these wouldn't be copied into your bin cause they are in the GAC .
Properties of your project and then target framework maybe? Perhaps if you include the dll's that SP1 puts in the GAC (like system.web.dynamicdata for example) during setup .
|
|
I am referencing some .NET DLLs in my .NET 3.5 project. Those DLLs have references to .NET 2.0 assemblies (like System.Data, etc.). I can not recompile those DLLs. I would like to install only .NET 3.5 and not have to install .NET 2.0. Will those DLLs...
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
All....
.NET v2.0.50727 is required for .NET v3.0 and v3.5.
So, you're fine if your assemblies are 2.0 assemblies.
However, .NET 3.5 is backwards compatible with .NET 3.0 and .NET 2.0 .
.NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 are separate.
NET 3.x is based off of .NET 2.0.
|
|
Hi,
My colleagues and I have some misunderstandings about the .NET runtime. I've written a WPF application (targeted for 3.5) that randomly crashes, and in the event log, we see .NET Runtime 2.0 Error Reporting as the source.
Just to confirm:
3.5 still...
Started by David Hodgson on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
There are, currently, 4 .NET runtimes....
You are correct.
Essentially the change is new assemblies (and new versions of .NET 2.0 assemblies) and new compilers .
The .NET 3.5 Framework runs on .NET 2.0 CLR.
Yes, you are right.
You are correct on both points.
|
