Omgili, forum search, forums search, search forums, discussion search,discussions search, search discussions, board search, boards search, search boards
  Advanced Search

More Whining...work related(long)

On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:05:06 -0400, Lisa Ann <...@stalnakershampine.com

Last week, I received about 1300 invoices from a regular vendor. 797
of them went into "Recycle" (that place in Peoplesoft where fucked up
invoices go) because this vendor has never grasped the concept that a
General Ledger Code is not equal to a Center Number. So when they
create a new item number, they put the center number as the GL Code.
(Considering this company only has two GL codes - 5303 (marketing) or
5524(office supplies), I truly cannot understand their problem.)

So I went through the rigamarole of getting those 797 vouchers
deleted. My mistake was not having all 1300 vouchers deleted.

The rigamarole, by the way, means asking our Peoplesoft guru to take
the criteria I give her (in this case, Vendor=12345689,
invoice_date=20090524, accounting date=20090525, entry_status="R") so
she can flesh out the entire SQL. Then we have to go to my boss's
boss to get permission to do it. I should have told her that the
criteria was Vendor=12345689, invoice_date=20090524,
accounting_date=20090525. Screw the postable ones.)

The vendor re-created the invoices and I received them on 5/29. I
couldn't load them on Friday because we'd closed AP. Cool.

Monday, 6/1, I realized I was receiving more invoices from that same
vendor. "Fine," I thought, "I'll just load everything at once instead
of running two separate jobs."

Now, I made a major programming flaw in that I defined the filenames
as {vendor}-{invoice}.dat. I should have tossed a random number in
that filename..but I didn't. So I'm responsible for the next problem.

The way I load the files into the system, I create a filelist with all
the filenames. I load the filelist into the system, which goes and
looks for the files and loads them.

All of you who are good with math are way ahead of me, aren't you?
Because the vendor sent duplicate files - it was the exact same file
that I'd received on Friday. So when the translator wrote out the
.DAT files, if the invoice number was the same, it appended the 2nd
invoice to the file. But it still wrote the filename out to the
filelist twice. So I didn't just load 797 invoices x 2...I loaded 797
invoices times 4.

Oh, and did I mention that the invoices I'd received the previous week
that also had the GL Code the same as the Center number? Those
actually got loaded because sometimes a center number is also a valid
GL Code. I blew up General Ledger and had to do a 368 line correction
journal entry.

So I got written up on Monday. It was not a good day. Glenn and Mark
are chastizing me for not *expecting* the vendor to do something this
incredibly stupid (GL Code vs Center). They're chastizing me for not
scrutinizing the new file from the vendor to make sure they're not
duplicates. So I better fucking do something about it...and I should
have done it before.

When we started this project, it was in the documentaion that we
expect valid invoices from our vendors...or else we're going to spend
a hell of a lot of time reading stuff to make sure it's legit.

So anyway, I got written up again. My attendance was also mentioned
again.

Last year I was written up because I was never at work "on-time".
"On-time" is 8am. Except no one gets there at 8am. (Prior to this
write-up, I got in at 8:20 or earlier.) And I'm supposed to leave
"on-time", which is 5pm. Except no one leaves at 5pm, they all hang
around. (Apparently they've learned this lesson better than I have.)
And even though I'm salaried, I'm supposed to make up time if I need
to leave for a doctor's appointment or something.

So my paranoia is increasing by leaps and bounds. My start time, in
my opinion (remember, I'm salaried so I don't punch a clock) is 7:45.
I still leave at 5pm, but I stopped taking lunch.

And that bit me in the ass too. Not this write up - they acknowledged
that I'm putting in 40 hours a week as documented by my co-workers.
(Who don't fucking see me come in at 7:45.)

The last write up on attendence, Mark had on there: "She got in at
8:10." "She called and said she'd be late, and got in at 8:05" "She
called and said that with the snow, she'd be late. She got in at
8:30." "She had a dentist appointment at noon, and didn't get back
until 12:45." She had a doctor's appointment at 1:00 and didn't get
back until 1:45." And during all these times, I didn't fucking take a
lunch. Technically we have 1 hour for lunch. If you eat lunch at
your desk, it's considered that you've made up 30 minutes.

And I wouldn't mind the 8:05, 8:10 times being held against
me...except the entire corporation has a 30 minute grace period. If
you're there by 8:30, you're on time.

Except me.

It's never noticed that I come in early, because neither Mark nor
Glenn are there to see me come in early. I've been eating at my desk
for so long that apparently it's not considered "making up time". I
don't seem to get credit or acknowledgement for when I stay late
(okay, maybe only 10-15 minutes...unless we're closing, then I can be
there as late as 7:30pm.) And I brought that up in the attendance
write up meeting. "You don't see what time I come in. You're
ignoring the fact that I don't go out to lunch, I eat at my desk. And
you're still pissed that I leave at 5pm when it's possible?" They
semi-acknowledged that they didn't know when I came in, and that they
weren't paying attention to what I was doing at lunch. But I was
still an attendance problem.

So this write up...first of all, I'm incredibly angry with myself
because I got emotional. I didn't cry (I don't cry in public), but I
did get choked up and misty-eyed. I had to say, "Excuse me a moment",
stare off into space and get myself under control. I hate it when I
do that.

This write up started out with how I'm "not on my game". Otherwise,
apparently, I would have noticed before the invoices were processed
that they were wrong. And I would have noticed when they sent me
duplicate invoices. And I would have noticed that there were 368
other lines that had been mis-attributed.

EXCEPT THAT IS THE POINT OF EDI!

Nobody looks at this shit unless there's a problem. You tell the
vendor, "I need this, this, that, the other thing" You expect them to
comply with the requirements. Nobody looks at this stuff if they
don't have to.

So, seriously, was I supposed to be prepared for receiving over 1000
invoices (whatever 797 plus 368 is) where they sent the wrong GL Code?

Was I also supposed to be prepared for them to send duplicates?

Yes. Yes, I was. Because I have the technological expertise to deal
with it. And I know I do, because I put some processes in place over
the past few days to prevent this from ever happening again.

"Why didn't you do that before?" Glenn asked me on Monday.

"Because I didn't know they could be this incredibly stupid. I
thought I'd taken care of the incredibly stupid stuff, but I missed
these two things. Oh, and because I didn't have access to Peoplesoft
prior to this to make it not happen."

"Well, you should have fixed this before it ever happened."

Right.

Glenn went on to ask me why I haven't been myself lately.
"uhm...gee...well, there's my paranoia about my attendance."

'Why are you paranoid?"

"Well, let's see...there's the last write up where we determined that
you think I'm working less than 40 hours a week...and when I pointed
out that I made that time up by coming in early, you dismissed it
because you come in 8:30 and Mark comes in between 8:10 and 8:20...so
you have no idea when I'm coming in."

"But you weren't making up your time!"

"Because you didn't know when I got here, you didn't notice that I
don't eat lunch outside anymore (I used to go to lunch every day with
Glenn and Barrett), all you see is that I leave at 5! I'm still being
punished! The shit is still going on!"

"Well," (this is Glenn), "I'm sure there's nothing I said that cause
that. It must have been Mark." (Did I mention that Mark was in the
room?)

"Lisa, it just looked like you're not making your time up."

"WHY? Because I come in early? Because I don't take a lunch?"

"Because you leave at 5 on the nose."

I take my 1-hour lunch every Tuesday and every other Friday. If
that's not making up my time (even for imaginary infractions - like
Mark gets in at 8:20, sees me at my desk, and assumes I got in at
8:10), I don't know what else to do.

Yes, the logical, practical thing would be to work until after Glenn
left (5pm on the nose, but he never comes down by my cube to see that
I'm still there) or until Mark leaves at 5:10, 5:20, 5:30....whatever
time he leaves. But I just don't see how that's fair.

According to my records, I work 42 hours a week.

It's been a really, really bad week. And there are no other EDI jobs
right now in the Upstate.

On the bright side, my husband loves me, I'm babysitting Mom's cat,
and tomorrow is Sushi Friday with my friend Carla.

Lisa Ann



On 5 Jun 2009 02:25:45 GMT, Dover Beach <...@gmail.com

Lisa Ann <...@4ax.com:

<snip job woes
If you're really an Exempt employee, then the fact that they are
treating you like a non-Exempt employee can sometimes, in some states,
magically turn you into a non-Exempt employee. Then they'd have to pay
you overtime anytime you've worked longer than 40 hours a week. And
sometimes it's retroactive! Do a little digging on the South Carolina
DOL site and see what you can find.

Or keep a timesheet and make them sign off on it. They've obviously
decided you're a problem and now they're not paying strict attention to
your actual hours. They only see confirming evidence for their
hypothesis that Lisa Is Slacking Off. Is there a time clock for the
hourly employees? Punch it in and out. Show them the results.

Alternatively, keep their hours. Come in at 8:00 or thereabouts, take
lunch with them, go home at 5:20. Sucks, I know.

--
Dover

On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:09:52 -0600, Greg Goss <...@gossg.org

Lisa Ann <...@stalnakershampine.com

I look back a year or two. I suspect that "my husband loves me" can
paper over a LOT of bullcrap.
--
Tomorrow is today already.
Greg Goss, 1989-01-27

On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:10:07 -0600, Greg Goss <...@gossg.org

Lisa Ann <...@stalnakershampine.com

Keep a time card in excel. Arrival time, start-lunch time, lunch
comment (at desk, at donut shop etc) resume time, depart time,
(B-A)+(E-D) for total hours of the day.

Each week, print it out, get Glen to sign it and grab a new copy from
your template.

If they're making an issue of you not making up time, document your
time. Once you've made and formatted the template, this would only
take a minute or so a day, and it's worth it if people are doubting
your word. Records made at the time are generally believed.

Fight "you're always ..." or "you never..." with information. Tell
Glenn that the moment he implies you're lying about the sheet, you're
outta there. You won't work with people who think you're a liar.
--
Tomorrow is today already.
Greg Goss, 1989-01-27

On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:33:59 -0700 (PDT), Arthur <...@yahoo.com

On Jun 4, 10:05 pm, Lisa Ann <...@stalnakershampine.com
That jobs making you so crazy, you're starting to hear invoices.

On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:40:06 -0400, "Lisa Ann" <...@stalnaker.com

"Cindbear" <...@4ax.com...

Yeah, it's going to get me in trouble one day...

Lisa Ann


On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:58:37 -0500, "David J. Martin" <...@tamu.edu

USENET posts sometimes get picked up by google searches. The more renown
Lisa Ann might be who saves you.

David

On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:54:46 +0000 (UTC), Opus the Penguin <...@gmail.com

Wuhfoolmuh?

--
Opus the Penguin
Oh dear. Did I post that out loud? - QueBarbara

On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:28:36 -0500, "David J. Martin" <...@tamu.edu

I think I've missed some part of my education and I know I'm not clever
enough to figure it out on my own. A google shows that you've used that
term several times in the past, but provides little help.

Google seems to be in on the joke. It asks:

Did you mean to search for: Whfoolmuh

If I click on that it comes back with:

Your search - Whfoolmuh - did not match any documents.

Ah, well. I can add that to the list of things I don't know. Since I
have teenage sons, that list is so long that it no longer troubles me to
add to it.

David


On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 19:47:16 +0000 (UTC), Opus the Penguin <...@gmail.com

It's an old saying in Tennessee. Or maybe Texas. But that's not
important right now. All it means is I don't quite get what you're
saying and think you may have left some words out or misspoken
somehow.

--
Opus the Penguin
You know, this may actually be the most magnificient piece of
insignificance I've ever seen. - Lisa Ann

On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:28:39 -0400, Lee Ayrton <...@panix.com

Soooo, etymologically speaking, you just called him a barbarian, right?

Lee "Ba bab ba" Ayrton

On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:51:27 -0500, "David J. Martin" <...@tamu.edu

Google on Lisa Ann and report back.

David

On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 20:28:37 +0000 (UTC), Opus the Penguin <...@gmail.com

Do I get to use one or both of her last names? Those take me right
to her.

--
Opus the Penguin
Have some gin and chocolate and simmer down, Ms Size Six. - Dover
Beach

On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:30:36 -0500, "David J. Martin" <...@tamu.edu

I didn't say to get creative. If you need more explicit instructions, here:

Google "lisa ann" and report back.

David

On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 20:44:09 +0000 (UTC), Opus the Penguin <...@gmail.com

Oh.

--
Opus the Penguin
I've known a few middle-aged guys who smoke pot regularly, and "a
permanent state of duh-ness" is an eloquent descriptor. - Veronique

On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:04:59 -0700, Les Albert <...@aol.com

On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 19:47:16 +0000 (UTC), Opus the Penguin
<...@gmail.com

Ninyi bwabwaja cheshi.

Les

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 01:14:48 +0100, Peter Ward <...@privacy.net

Les Albert says...

That's what you always say.

--

Peter, from outside the asylum

I'm an alien
email: usenet at peterward dot adsl24 dot co dot uk
You can put lipstick on a dog, but it's still going to end up on some
other dog's butt.
- Groo

On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:59:03 -0700, Les Albert <...@aol.com

On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 01:14:48 +0100, Peter Ward <...@privacy.net

Nov shmoz kapop.

Les

On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:55:52 -0700 (PDT), Veronique <...@gmail.com

On Jun 5, 12:47 pm, Opus the Penguin <...@gmail.comwrote:

I understood him to mean that a search via Google for Lisa Ann would
turn up so many famous Lisa Anns that our AFCA Lisa Ann is in no
danger of being tracked down through a casual look-see at the
internets, much as a search for Opus would not necessarily turn up
AFCA's particular flightless waterfowl.

V.
--
Veronique Chez Sheep

On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:12:11 -0700, bill van <...@shawcanada.ca

In article
<...@q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com Veronique <...@gmail.com
No fair paying attention.

--
bill
remove my country for e-mail

Discussion Title: More Whining...work related(long)
Title Keywords: More  Whining...work  related(long)