Omgili, forum search, forums search, search forums, discussion search,discussions search, search discussions, board search, boards search, search boards
  Advanced Search

Why The Horror Genre Is Dying from Examiner.com

Your Ad Here

Anonymous Wrote:

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-11229-Newark-Film-Examiner~y2009m5d27-Seven- reasons-why-the-horror-genre-is-dying

With the upcoming release of Sam Raimi’s new film “Drag Me to Hell,”
it’s a good time to think about what the horror genre has become over
the past few years. It's films have gone from being rebellious and
violent statements to watered down, socially accepted, children’s
movies. Sure the films are profitable, but they lack originality and
artistry, causing many diehard fans to lose hope. So what’s happened
to horror? There are seven factors, each one more ghastly than the
last, that are leading to the genre’s demise.

7) Over Saturation
It would seem “quantity over quality” has become the horror adage.
Each week more and more poorly produced, straight-to-video horror
films hit the shelves and each week, the genre becomes a little more
diluted. Horror is becoming the new porn, where anyone with a video
camera and willing participants can shoot a film and get distribution.
This lackadaisical approach to filmmaking turns a genre with little
respect into a complete joke.

6) Big Budgets
It might appear shortsighted to say a bigger budget would have a
negative effect on a film. The more money spent, the better the film
will be, right? Not always. What made many of the older films so scary
is how real they seemed, looking more like documentaries than feature
films. Also, no one in the films looked like actors. Leatherface’s
family in the original “Texas Chain Saw Massacre” looked like they
were pulled from a local insane asylum, not a casting call. All in
all, the films were so genuine that they scared audiences for days
after leaving the theater. Today, horror films are so stylized and
clean it would be like getting scared by a car commercial.

5) Computer Graphics
Has the price of corn syrup and red food coloring skyrocketed? Recent
horror films have become so dependent on computer graphics that they
look more like cartoons than live action movies. Think of how much
better “I Am Legend” would have been if the monsters chasing Will
Smith around dilapidated New York City weren’t those silly looking
animated abominations. The thing with CG is it can be beneficial, but
when it’s overused, the films tend to be less scary and more stupid.

4) PG-13 Ratings
Nothing makes horror fans gripe and groan more than seeing a PG-13
rating on a horror film. What this rating guarantees the audience is
that there will be little language, no nudity, and toned down
violence, while guaranteeing the producers of the film a better box
office turnout. The PG-13 rating plays to the teeny bopper crowd, who
will scream in terror at every single cheap scare inserted throughout.
It also robs potentially good films of any kind of legitimacy with
unrealistic dialogue, little suspense, and moderate violence. Not to
say violence in moderation isn’t sometimes a good thing, which brings
us to...

3) Torture and Rape
Many of today’s horror filmmakers are confusing what’s disgusting with
what’s scary. In a genre where less can be more, over the top, bizarre
violence has become a crutch. From the “Hostel” films to “Saw” one
through one million, it’s obvious that these filmmakers are trying to
get scares by repulsing their audience. What they need to realize is
making someone vomit is far different than actually scaring them.
Along with torture, rape scenes have become a way for filmmakers to
push the envelope. Yes, some older horror films did contain both these
aspects, but today it seems every horror film has a scene with someone
tied to a chair getting god-knows-what shoved god-knows-where, while
somewhere else a poor unsuspecting girl is about to be deflowered by
some maniac. Ultimately, you have to ask yourself, is this really
entertaining?

2) First Person Point of View
Why is it that every time someone runs in a film there are sequences
of nauseating hand-held camerawork? Can the viewer not understand what
the person on the screen is doing without seeing it through their
eyes? If that’s not bad enough, there are the films in which the
characters themselves are shooting the movie. Ever since “The Blair
Witch Project” filmmakers have been making first person horror films
and every time the characters use the same sparse reasoning of “I’m
filming this because it’ll be important,” to justify their actions.
Even horror legend George A. Romero took part in these shenanigans in
his last film “Diary of the Dead.” There is nothing more unbelievable
than a group of twenty-something idiots who think filming giant aliens
or zombies or invisible witches is more important than their own
safety.

1) Remakes
It’s nothing new for filmmakers to rehash old ideas and characters,
but the horror genre has become notorious for it. At this moment,
there are over 60 horror films slated to be remade. Granted some of
them are just talk, but it’s a staggering number even if only half of
them come to fruition.

At first the remakes were of classic and foreign films (“The Texas
Chainsaw Massacre,” “The Ring,”), but in 2009, it would seem producers
are willing to remake anything. The list of upcoming remakes includes
the classic (“Nightmare on Elm Street,” “Hellraiser”), to the not-so-
classic (“The Gate,” “It’s Alive”), to the completely ludicrous
(“House on Sorority Row,” “Plan 9 from Outer Space”), all of which are
completely unnecessary. All these remakes do is halt progress on new
ideas. Instead of starting new franchises, they keep bringing back the
old, rarely improving on the originals. If there is a film which is
revered among its audience, then why would it need to be redone?
Hollywood has also started to confuse the word “remake” with “reset,”
continuing film franchises from the remakes. So in 20 years are there
going to be remakes of the remakes?

There are no doubt positive sides to each one of these factors. For
one, with the over saturation of the market, many more talented
filmmakers are getting their films seen. With studios willing to shell
out more and more cash to produce horror films, the genre will never
completely die. Not every remake or PG-13 film is terrible. It’s a
matter of taste and opinion. Some people like computer graphics and
don’t mind shaky camerawork. Yes, there are even those strange and
demented people who don’t mind seeing torture and rape in films. “I
Spit on Your Grave” is still selling copies, right? So even though the
damage done may seem insurmountable, there is still hope for horror.
Someone just needs to step up and save it.



On 3 Jun 2009 01:08:45 GMT, "Avoid normal situations." <...@eskimo.com

*yawn* They always say this until something good comes out...

--
alt.flame Special Forces
"When people are free to do as they please, they usually imitate each other."
-- Eric Hoffer

On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:51:55 -0500, Bonestructure <...@1s.net

The horror genre will never die. Horror is the original form of
storytelling. When cavemen sat around the fire gnawing on greasy bones,
someone told a story about nasty evil things out in the forest that would
get you if you weren't good and didn't watch out.

Horror always goes through phases. It gets hellishly popular, as in the
70s and 80s, and then it drops in popularity for a while. But it never
goes away. Written horror is, oh, coasting along at the moment, not bad,
not good, but out there. Filmed horror is in something of a decline, due
mostly, I think, to the execrable torture porn sub genre and due even
more to a complete lack of imagination and originality on the part of the
studios. It will bounce back. If you look at the trends in horror right
now, they're all looking for another franchise series to hit big.
Halloween did it. Friday the 13th did it. Nightmare on Elm Street did it.
Chucky saved its entire studio from bankruptcy. But sadly, instead of
hiring writers with genuine talent to come up with amazing and original
concepts, they seem to feel that the way to create a new successful
franchise is to, ta da, remake the old successful franchises. Making most
of them PG 13 and taking out everything that made the franchises
successful in the first place.

Mind you, I don't dislike remakes. IF a movie can really benefit from
being remade, and IF they can add something new to it. If you can't add
something new, if you can't improve it, shut the hell up. Like Rob
Zombie's Halloween. He took out everything that made the original the
great movie it was, and made a completely boring piece of crap. Why
bother. Yet, I foolishly insist on believing he actually does have the
potential to make good films. Unlike Midnight Shamalamadingdong, who is a
talentless hack.

I'd REALLY like to see John Carpenter return to horror instead of sitting
on his ass letting people make crappy remakes of his films.

I'd like to see Uwe Boll stop playing video games, get his head together,
watch some Italian and Asian horror and then go out and make a horror
movie using that weirdass German point of view that makes German horror
movies so damn strange and wonderful.

--
If horror movies have taught me anything it's this: Once the disease
takes hold, head to the red-light district. If you're gonna be caught and
eaten, it might as well be by zombie hookers.

http://www.bonestructure.net

On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:19:10 +0100, Dr Walpurgis <...@cunting.hun

On 2009-06-04 15:51:55 +0100, Bonestructure <...@1s.net

I was in Germany at the weekend. Twenty four hours of SAUSAGES and
STEINS. And OFF-COLOUR JOKES about the LONG TRAIN FROM HOLLAND to get
there.

--
"That's great. But if you didn't buy my book, I'm not interested in
your bullshit, you nameless douche bag. - Gene, 29/12/06

On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:02:58 GMT, DeadRodentTyping <...@alreadydead.edu

Dr Walpurgis <...@drwalpurgis.motzarella.org:

zing!

--
http://deadrodentyping.blogspot.com

On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:17:02 +0100, "Killer Kane" <...@large.com

<...@gmail.com
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-11229-Newark-Film-Examiner~y2009m5d27-Seven- reasons-why-the-horror-genre-is-dying

Hollywood is just a minor blip on my horror map.


On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:15:00 GMT, DeadRodentTyping <...@alreadydead.edu

"Killer Kane" <...@newsfe26.ams2:

*sniff* No sense of history.

And fretting about the last decade like some Cassandra hallucinating the
end of a genre that's been around since D.W. Griffith's "I, Rapist".

--
http://deadrodentyping.blogspot.com

On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:07:46 -0700 (PDT), Jared <...@hotmail.com

On Jun 4, 11:15 pm, DeadRodentTyping
<...@alreadydead.edu

I'm also working on an exciting new theory: kids these days don't have
any respect.

Notice that even his own points contradict themselves? Too many
cheaply made movies plus enormous budgets. Too much rape and torture
plus everything is PG-13.

On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:00:59 GMT, DeadRodentTyping <...@alreadydead.edu

Jared <...@e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com:

lol

--
http://deadrodentyping.blogspot.com

On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:37:52 -0400, "Kishin" <...@idonotthinkso.com

"Jared" <...@e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...

I am again forced to bring up "The Lady in Black," which would surely get a
G or maybe PG rating, yet is an alt.horror favorite. A horror film doesn't
have to be rated R to be good.

--

R Rated Kishin


On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:46:00 +0100, ReVulse <...@psychaoticREMOVETHIS.fsnet.co.uk

THE WOMAN IN BLACK.

--
#Andy#

http://www.last.fm/user/revulse_1968/

"all your glad-handing is going to be wasted effort
as soon as I drive ReVulse and the others permanently
off alt.horror." - Avoid Normal Situations (7th May 2009)

On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:33:33 +0100, "Killer Kane" <...@aol.com

That's Everclear for you.


On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:32:07 -0700 (PDT), wcmartell <...@compuserve.com

Double yawn. This is based on the concept that horror is "rebellious
and violent statements" - but that is just false. And even if that
were true, after that half of the films they shoot down are actually
the violent and rebellious ones! Come on! Just mushy thinking, here.

- Bill