|
|
On Sun, 17 May 2009 23:57:03 -0700, "DGVREIMAN" <...@comcast.net
"Mac" <...@4ax.com...
FALSE MEDALS - REBUTTAL
http://tinyurl.com/otvaph Purple Heart Defamation from gang revealed
and rebutted. Irrefutable proof the gang has been using outright
fraud, defamation and forgeries to smear and defame in respect to this
issue.
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in
this article represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical
fact, nor is about, directed toward or against any particular person -
other than those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being
posted for entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post
personally annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please
notify me of your specific reasons for annoyance via email at
lega...@comcast.net. If we find your detailed objections
reasonable (considering the "reasonable person" doctrine and case law)
we will then remove this post, or the offending passages contained
therein, from the Google archive, publicly apologize and retract. My
intent is to entertain, and to present articles to USENET readers
prior to publication to determine interest, and not to annoy, abuse,
humiliate, or in any way cause anyone emotional harm by posting on
USENET or elsewhere. Please note that defending myself from harassment
and obloquy with rebuttal posts has been deemed a "lawful and
legitimate" publication by my legal counsel. If I am not attacked,
libeled, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles not
interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP's and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web
site or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).
SMEAR MERCHANT DISCLAIMER TWO: Considering the typical ridiculous,
absurd and obviously false claims about my military service that
originates from the crackpot smear and con gang that operates on
alt.war.Vietnam, I also hereby certify and attest this article is NOT
a secret coded message that only gang members can decode with their
secret Federal Agent/Sp4 draftee/former Junior Reserve Officer/ midget
decoder and mind reading rings.
This means the Brownie crackpots' inevitable accusations and howls
that this article is really me claiming in a special soothsaying code
(a code only crackpots et al smear gang can only read of course which
involves their typical claim the American Heritage Dictionary's
definitions of simple terms, such as "we" "estimated" "involved"
"retired from" and "not representing any biographical claim" are all
incorrect, and only their "special interpretations of the English
language can apply to all English terms I use, and of course the gang's
standard nonsensical mind reading and soothsaying claims that (1) I
was a CIA cross border assassin that sniper killed Ho Chi Minh,
HOORAH - (2) that I personally killed 1803 enemy soldiers in Vietnam
and then feasted on their bodies (burp) (3) that I was a secret member
of the Mi Lai massacre, (let god sort them out) that I hunted down and
murdered unarmed Priests (take that choir boy) (4) that I was trained
by the Martian Army on Mars, and I have green blood, and retractable
fangs (slurp), (5) that the movie "Rambo" was copied after my deeds in
Vietnam and I still live in caves in the northwest (6) and best of
all, I went to the Carlise War College to study WWII tactics even
before I was born!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHHA.
Needless to say, the smear gang misrepresentations of my past posts
are of course, not true.
I have posted dozens of times on USENET that I will not post
autobiographical facts about my life on USENET in any detail. Only a
quip now and then. And, if anyone wants to know the true facts, or a
clarification of any quip, or more information and details about an
issue which are clearly missing in my quips they must first contact
me via email, identify themselves, and then I will determine if I want
to exchange such personal information with them.
Although the above is my standing offer, I should mention that NOT ONE
member of the gang has ever contacted me directly over any one of my
posts. It is clear the gang does not want to know about obvious
typos, errors, and occasional ambiguities, nor clarifications, nor
corrections, nor do they even want verification whether I was the
actual author of the post in question.
As experts on Investigations and the US Military have noted, the gang
leaders and their members clearly want to avoid the truth whenever it
contradicts their contrived and conspired defaming parsing and
fraudulent misrepresentations and distortions of what I have written
in the past, or contradicts their lies and fraud in respect to what is
and is not truly contained in my military records, and of course,
their fraudulent use of USENET posts they know others have written to
use to smear me, defame me, hold me up to public ridicule, stalk me,
and otherwise further their years' long demonizing and vilification
campaign they have been regularly waging against me.
In short, the gang does not want to know the truth, and they are
desperate to stop me from defending myself as they know my truthful
rebuttals, which they cannot defend as they know what I am posting is
true, reveals them for what they really are.
The gangs lies and fraud border on the pathological, and include the
gang' preposterous and goofy fraud that (7) a Purple Heart VA card is
the same as a Purple Heart Medal (I have posted on USENET dozens of
times I did not receive a Purple Heart Medal) (8) Nor that removing
hundreds of typos, errors, misstatements made by typists and I found
so far in about thirty-five THOUSAND extemporaneous posts under
accounts I used, and then replacing the errors with the true intended
context and meaning by the author is somehow "sinister" and the
original discarded post was the correct intended post and the
corrected version is false! (Giggle).
Such glaring preposterous crackpot et al smear and fraud gang claims
about me are, as usual, blatantly false and equally ridiculous. (Ask
the gang leaders for proof of their claims the next time they make
such ludicrous claims and watch them scurry for their rocks or produce
their own forgeries, or perhaps typos, errors and such that have long
been detected and discarded in my waste basket they have dug out of
that trash). And no, regardless of forgeries and discarded posts found
in my waste basket that were thrown there because of an error or
typist misstatement by one of our typist's, I have posted about two
dozen times in the past that my time in South America was spent (other
than an assignment and short visit to Southern Command after I left
Vietnam) exclusively as a Civilian working for Montana Western Oil and
Gas or PCA, which evidence was scanned and posted years ago.)
Also, in response to the smear gang's et al repeated and convenient
outright lie and fraud that I never said that others were using the
same accounts to post on USENET as I did until the smear gang leaders
started their fraud, con and smear campaign against me and thereby
forced me to post on this newsgroup to defend myself, please see the
following proof that of course the gang leaders et al have been caught
lying again:
http://tinyurl.com/6d4aay TYPISTS' GALORE POST proves there were about
71 previous posts prior to the gang's glaring lie that I never
mentioned others posting under the same accounts I used until after
the gang leaders started to use a few typos, errors and post fragments
written by many different people, years apart, never written on any
military forum, deceptively spliced together with forged words added
into or subtracted from the hodgepodge of different context post
fragments so as to fraudulently alter their meaning or context.
http://tinyurl.com/7kfaqz Experts on Smear Gangs reveal what the
Nigel Brooks con and smear gang is all about.
http://tinyurl.com/bu3dwb Those that Label Others KOOK suffer
psychosis named EID say psychologists - and that Kook votes never
occur outside of the smear gang.
http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks lies about receiving medals he
never received, and serving in war campaigns long after he had already
left active duty.
http://tinyurl.com/bxrf2b US Government Web Site and independent
Experts on the US Military confirm Nigel Brooks lied about my
military service and my military records. (This read is important as
the gang is claiming that my military records disproved or prove
various things, but we find those claims to be nothing more than
outright cons and fraud from the gang. Brooks and Rau and other gang
members have been lying about the contents of my records for years.
Above is just some of the proof of that fact.
http://tinyurl.com/ddogy4 Proof of just a few of Nigel Brooks
outright forgeries which he has used to fraudulently defame and smear
me - yes *forgeries* - fraud and deception from Nigel Brooks.
End Disclaimer - Rebuttal Begins below:
"Mac" <...@4ax.com...
Doug Says: Why would you be interested in what anyone has to say
about someone "else" that was wounded??? How would they know the
nature of the wound, its severity, or its origin? What if someone was
"wounded" by friendly fire? Back then that Soldier would not be
awarded a Purple Heart Medal. Moreover, a "wound" can mean many
different things as the American Heritage Dictionary below provides:
http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks lies about receiving medals he
never received, and serving in war campaigns long after he had already
left active duty.
I suspect there were thousands of men that received wounds in Vietnam
of one kind or another that did not whine for nor receive a purple
heart medal. One of Brooks own gang members, a person by the name of
Bear, also said he was wounded but never received a purple heart
medal.
The men I knew did not whine nor cry for medals every time they
received a scratch.. . and sometimes they did not whine and cry for
medals when they received more than a scratch - like a concussion as
an example. The American Heritage Dictionary indicates there are many
different possibilities of a wound:
"wound1 other impact"
That means *any wound* regardless of how tiny, insignificant or
unimportant would qualify as a "wound" and if the "mind and word
police" want Vets to tell the truth without being falsely accused of
something, they should learn the King's English. Claiming a "wound"
does not automatically extrapolate into a Purple Heart Medal, that
claim is utter nonsense. It wasn't until 2003 or so that the military
allowed Purple Heart Medals for wounds received due to friendly fire.
Does that mean all of those men in Vietnam that received wounds due to
Friendly Fire can never say they were wounded? Again, the premise is
idiotic.
To receive the purple heart medal you needed to be treated for a
wound by an official medical person - and no one I knew would run to
the Hospital for some tiny wound - well maybe someone like John Kerry,
but certainly no NCO that I knew. But then there are people that
actually were wounded (concussions etc) and never bothered to whine
nor file papers for a purple heart medal because of lost records or
general disinterest.
If you tripped and fell en route to the officer's club during a rocket
attack you would also receive the purple heart medal - so is everyone
that claims they "tripped and fell" in Vietnam also de facto claiming
they have a purple heart medal? BWHAHAHAHHAHAHA. The premise is nutty.
Some wounds qualify for the medal, some do not - but they were *both*
wounds! Some men did not care about the medal, and just sucked it up
and kept on with a little blood in their boot. Either you say you
have the Medal or you say you do not have the medal - period, end of
story. Using "word police" to extrapolate false accusations is utter
bullshit..
Also, I wonder why Mr. Tom Rau does not say anything about all those
lies Nigel Brooks and other gang members have told about their
military service? Now these are not "de facto lies" conjured up by
someone's obviously biased imagination, these are real provable lies
based upon Nigel Brooks' dates of active service. Why no mention of
all this fraud coming from Nigel Brooks?
http://tinyurl.com/5o59lr Nigel Brooks lies about receiving medals he
never received, and serving in war campaigns long after he had already
left active duty. (I have more lies from Brooks and other gang
members - but I am saving them for another place and time).
I am also bewildered why Mr. Rau never mentions the fact that all
those officers and NCO's testified in front of Congress they were
ordered by MACV to lie in After Action Reports and news accounts of
actions in Vietnam?
Do you know how many officers received medals due to those now
admitted lies and fraud?
I can only guess, but I would estimate TENS OF THOUSANDS received
medals due to fraudulent reports, or reports the officers' themselves
helped to write up or wrote up - especially when they received medals
for writing up their own reports ( a few enlisted men might have also
received medals due to those fake reports and this would be especially
true if the same medal or higher was awarded to an officer that was
with the enlisted man during the event - can't give the medal to the
officer without including the enlisted man - someone might bitch).
Not to mention all those times "officers" fraudulently logged in air
craft as crew members, although they really were nothing but
passengers, so they could qualify for the "Air Medal."
I believe this "fraudulent medal" issue is far more important that
some idiot claiming that he was something in a war he was not, or
dressing up as a Soldier. Fake medals to officers? TENS OF THOUSANDS
OF THEM? Why is that lament not being published by Tom Rau?
(Now you know why all those officers in Vietnam received Silver
Stars - did you really believe such a high percentage of commissioned
officers that served in Vietnam were "heros?" BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA).
If they received a good "write up" they received the medal - and we
now know all those "write ups" were lies and fraud.
Now "that's" a factual story worth investigating - not to mention all
of the valor all those "officers" have stolen from those that actually
did something brave and not just had a lie and fraudulent version
written up in a false after action reports, as the authors of those
reports have now revealed to Congress they were ordered to do!
I am also bewildered why Mr. Rau never mentions all of those former
"officers" that were busted selling investment scams to our troops en
route to Iraq and Afghanistan? Do you know how much money those
"officers" cost our troops? The story is amazing, but again Mr. Rau
ducks, hides and avoids the real story about Vietnam medals, and
former Vietnam era officers scamming our troops.
I wonder why?
Doug Grant (Tm)
|