 |
|
 |
|
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 21:16:06 -0700 (PDT), Jon° <...@live.co.uk
On Jul 2, 3:48 am, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
You can vote Conservative, Labour or Lib/Dem and you are still only
voting for the one party that rules the UK........That is of course
the Lib/Lab/Con Party.......................This one party rules our
life’s, ruins our country and ensures a continuing influx of
immigrants and the steady “De-Britainisation” of Britain.
Why does our one party state operate in this way? Because it consists
of lawyers, accountants and ne'er-do-wells’ who only care for
themselves and the filthy lucre that they can milk from this ruined
country. They care not a jot about us, the electorate, to them we a
just a mob that deserves no better then them.
The only path that can save us is the path leading toward revolution.
Hopefully bloodless. The Houses of Parliament require cleansing…………A
total clearout of those who have brought this nation to its knees is
the only answer now. We must rid Westminster of the present stench
that envelopes it.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:47:48 +0100, "Hal Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
You don't promote an alternative to the Parliamentary system? No good having
a revolution going off half cock! A revolution may also mean we lose the
Royal Family as a status symbol and have to endure a boring and very
socialist President, who eventually costs more than the Royal Family ever
did! A lot to be said for the status quo, and even more for being Patriotic.
I honestly believe that we are all failing in our duties and NOT being
sufficiently Patriotic. Oh, and of course, WE are to blame for the idiots we
elect into Parliament, nobody else! - I don't see a revolution stopping
that!
FWIW, there used to be a saying that "the fool of the family is always put
into either the church or politics". It does seem sometimes that that may
still be the case!
--
Harry Merrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:23:10 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
I admit I have some objection to openly gay politicians - but not
because they are gay - because they are openly gay, others expect them
to have a socialist agenda, to promote minority rights etc etc.
It doesn't matter if you are gay or not, if you just keep your mouth
shut and get on with the job. Sadly experience shows that this does not
tend to happen.
Never heard of that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:04:48 +0100, hummingbird <...@hummingbind.plusnet.com
And you, Chris Millbank, are no different to those perverts
alt.comp.freeware has seen the proof of that many times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:43:54 +0100, JNugent <...@noparticularplacetogo.com
There's a school of thought which holds that Labour have already provided the
first gay PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:57:24 +0200, abelard <...@abelard.org
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:43:54 +0100, JNugent
<...@noparticularplacetogo.com
yes, indeed...surely mandelslime is a queer....
and i see nothing against him, on merit, being pm.....
he's obviously far more able than the clown and all the rest of
the sorry lot...
the only problem is that he's a socialist.......not that he's a homo..
but...
i'd far rather a thick socialist like the clown...or a mediocre one
like bliar...because they can do far less damage to the
country....
but on ability there is no contest....
regards...
--
web site at http://www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:59:33 +0200, abelard <...@abelard.org
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:57:24 +0200, abelard <...@abelard.orgwrote:
ps...it says a very great deal about the true nature of 'new' labour
that even now they're trying to cover up the fact they had to
appoint mandelslime in the end....
regards
--
web site at http://www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:48:22 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
lol...I hadn't thought of that!
I don't care if they are gay or not - but sadly openly gay people seem
to have very left-wing views...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:44:31 +0100, Iapetus <...@inbox.com
There is also a school of thought that all gays are kiddy fiddlers,
doesn't make it true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:05:39 +0100, JNugent <...@noparticularplacetogo.com
Of coiurse, not all schools of thought are - or can be - correct in their
thinking.
As a good example, there is (believe it or not) a school of thought which
holds Gordon Brown to be something like competent. Well, not so much a school
of thought as about three hundred odd Labour MPs who want to stay on the
gravy train for another eleven months.
But on the matter of the gay PM, I take it you aren't going to stick up for
the inclusiveness of the Labour Party, then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Andy <...@googlemail.com
On 2 July, 03:48, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
Elton John , Lewis Hamilton etc got there because they were good as
opposed to gay or black... So why not. Straight white guys are er... a
minority!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:11:08 +0100, John Bennett <...@bt.com
Try saying that to Richard Branson or David Beckham:-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:14:37 +0100, Anthropy <...@bogus.com
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:11:08 +0100, John Bennett
<...@bt.com
Why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:41:55 +0200, abelard <...@abelard.org
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:48:50 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.ukwrote:
you should read more carefully....
he is saying the tory party is much more tolerant...as it is.....
therefore it is probable....
meanwhile, what was heath?
the socialist 'new' labour party seems now to have caught up
these last few weeks....
it is you who is making the big deal of it....
and i do think cameron may have been better not giving you that
opportunity....
to any sane person, it is no big deal....
maggie came to the top because she was up to the job....
can you see any socialist female mp who comes close to that
ability? i certainly can't...
but then neither does mandelslime...or any of the rest of his
cabinet....
but this new labour pm is allegedly openly homosexual....
what is your complain against king's aspiration??
"i have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a
nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but
by the content of their character."
to a tory such matter should be irrelevant....
to cameron, clearly they are irrelevant....
why are they so relevant to you?
perhaps you should be voting socialist....it is socialists who want to
live in a beehive....
it is socialists who try to divide people into 'them and us'...into
'interest groups'...into 'jews' and 'nationals'...into 'workers' and
'capitalists'....
it is socialists that seek divides....that is not the tory way....
and he is merely telling you that....
the fact that he can't do that without the ridiculous responses being
demonstrated in this thread is a sad reflection on how low
socialist 'education' and public sound-bite politics has brought
even you
regards
--
web site at http://www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:59:47 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
Why does he need to say that? What policies have the conservatives had
in the past 20 years that have been 'homophobic'? Even Section 28 could
have been argued as the French have argued to keep religion out of
schools - that it is not the place of schools to teach the value of
relationships of any kind.
A fat socialist who liked yachting?
Caught up with what?
I didn't make the speech. I don't want to hear Cameron talking about Gay
or Muslim or more equality law - I want to hear him talk about taxation,
crime, work, the economy - these things are relevant to every person in
this country whatever their religion or orientation.
Why does he think it would be unique to have a gay or black PM anyway,
unless he is a natural bigot who thinks that such a thing would be unusual?
Most of us don't care...
Indeed. So why make a point of saying it? If we have a level playing
field, why go out of your way to recruit Muslim politicians? C'mon
abelard...I know you desperately want a Tory win - so do I, but the
right kind. Are you really comfortable with all this posturing?
Indeed
Nope
Yes - and naturally a lefty. How many gay people have been naturally
conservative, or if they are, have wanted to actually implement
naturally conservative policies? They tend to lean to extremes of
promoting equality and grouping with other minorities. Brian Paddick -
we do not do Islamic and Terrorism in the same sentence. (my words -
can't remember his exact ones). How did the Met get into that state?
Mervyn?
Oh right. Why do you think I am against that? You know me better than
that - to defend Cameron by claiming that I might be a racist is a bit
underhand. You have known me long enough...
I am not judging people by their colour or sexuality - Cameron is, which
is why he made a point of saying what he said.
Yes
Obviously not so why did he mention it?
Naughty. They are not relevant to me and you know that - *he* is
relevant to me!
I think you're getting a bit carried away now so I'll stop here...
“The Conservatives had the first woman prime minister, and we are bound
to have the first black prime minister and the first gay prime minister"
Is that to highlight a divide or not? I didn't say it - he did.
The discernible difference between 'telling' and 'seeking' in this
context is...?
Ok I get the picture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:20:15 +0100, "Aramis Gunton" <...@nink.demon.co.uk
"Maria" <...@bt.com...
Maria,
Abe looks resigned to eat with 2 fingers rather than 4 covered in shit.
You on the other hand, somewhat unrealistically it appears, would prefer to
consume your goodies with a freshly cleansed utensil.
Times, I fear, have changed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:12:38 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
You are probably right.
At the least, I want Cameron to know that his new government is on
probation - the way they are behaving, it's as if they really are going
to do a gung-ho New Labour style parliament and change so many things in
a short space of time...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:25:01 +0200, abelard <...@abelard.org
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:12:38 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.ukwrote:
i would say to point out the difference between tory and socialist
'new' labour attitudes...
this is the quote you found....
"The Conservatives had the first woman prime minister, and we
are bound to have the first black prime minister and the first gay
prime minister."
sounds like a statement of fact to me....with a mite of mockery and
spite thrown in....
it also highlights that difference for those who define themselves by
such trivia....and haven't yet worked out the realities of the
curse that is socialist 'new' labour
he's got to get the votes of enough people to change the situation...
while 50% have an iq of under 100....and are eligible to vote....
you and maria can keep your hands spotlessly clean and bug
free.....and even claim how much morally superior that makes
you...
a serious leader may be constrained to provide that service for you...
i hope you will appreciate the service
as for probation...imv is cameron doesn't win......and doesn't come
up to snuf...the next stage will be growing civil unrest....
in those circumstances, i don't think 'on probation' is relevant....
it's either perform or end up with serious problems....
the country can't afford this much socialism...let alone any more!!
regards
--
web site at http://www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:37:26 +0100, William Black <...@hotmail.co.uk
As I keep telling you, it's more than 50%.
Nobody ever got more intelligent due to ageing or after an accident
--
William Black
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:28:11 GMT, Svenne <...@aol.com
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:48:50 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.ukwrote:
Why not a one legged geriatric black lesbian Muslim prime minister
with learning difficulties?
It would prove our tolerance and diversity and make us the envy of the
civilised world.
Svenne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:00:58 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
You seem to get the point. Please tell abelard who seems to be getting
annoyed with me and thinking that I am a closet socialist...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:38:01 +0200, abelard <...@abelard.org
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:00:58 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.ukwrote:
because
1)that is not a large voting block...
2)it would be taken in even worse part by idiots as it would be
read as mockery...
3)no tory with learning difficulties could get to the top of the party
i'm not annoyed with you...how many times...
i am surprised you believe it to be of much moment...i'm surprised
you even thought it of as moment to make a thread of it
regards
--
web site at http://www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:04:00 GMT, Svenne <...@aol.com
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:00:58 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.ukwrote:
Abelard, will you please stop getting annoyed with Maria. She is not a
closet socialist. I have no idea what she gets up to in her closet,
but whatever it is, it isn't socialism.
Svenne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:38:50 +0200, abelard <...@abelard.org
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:04:00 GMT, Svenne <...@aol.com
i will take your reassurance with considerable relief...
regards
--
web site at http://www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 04:17:07 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
And actually I think I've had enough.
I think I probably won't bother to vote in the GE, unless UKIP are
standing...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:06:52 +0100, "Ivan" <...@yahoo.com
"Maria" <...@bt.com...
Wait and see Gordon is sure to go one better and promise that Labour will
have the first black lesbian prime minister.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:39:53 +1200, Roger Dewhurst <...@wave.co.nz
Is he now a member of Arsebandits Anonymous?
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:33:25 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
He is a member of Unite Against Fascism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:37:14 -0700 (PDT), Mike <...@aol.com
On 1 July, 20:17, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
UKIP will I am sure stand. I'm afraid it's the only choice.
Encouraging the BNP in it's present form won't help us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:46:01 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
In my constituency, there are rarely members of non mainstream parties
standing. There are no 'special interest' groups here - just the boring
conservative majority.
Hopefully they will stand one here, but although they did last time,
they only got 2.6% of the vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:47:30 +0100, "Hal Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
Sadly, if one wastes one's vote on a non-mainstream party, one runs a big
risk of giving the election back to Labour. We don't have PR for our
elections yet, and I am glad of that, if only because PR often encourages
hung parliaments. Even if you vote Liberal Dems, you will only weaken the
party which eventually wins, hopefully the Conservatives.
--
Harry Merrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:06:09 +0100, "Hal Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
Maria, I am very surprised at you! Gays have been with us all since time
began. Made in God's Image, like we all are! There are even Gay Christians
for goodness sake! - The House of Commons is full of gay MP's already and
always has been. We may even have already "had" a gay Prime Minister for all
we know. What's your problem? What about a little tolerance and
understanding? Attitudes like that make you out to be every bit as bad as
all the other kookies and Conspiracy Theorists on Usenet! As for a Black or
Coloured PM eventually. Well? So what? In a true Democracy, everyone has to
have the same chance to gain power as everyone else. It will not be for a
very long time yet anyway. - If you don't vote in the GE then you are giving
away your right to complain about anything and everything!!
:-))
--
Harry Merrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:30:35 -0700 (PDT), Mike <...@aol.com
On 2 July, 01:06, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
You are missing the point. People want the big issues addressed not
this minority rhetoric.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:19:45 +0100, "Hal Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
Yes, your right of course. However, I sensed the stench of unnessessary bias
and protested! - I was probably wrong, I often am!! :-))
--
Harry Merrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:34:44 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
Er...I'm not anti-gay - not in the slightest. I am anti-politicians
that have to grovel and play to minority audiences, whether it is to
garner votes, or because they are actually so pro-whoever that they
kotow to them. I am not anti-Muslim per se, but to hear Simon thing
begging an audience of Muslims and saying that 'we need you to lead us'
to them is simply inexplicable and revolting.
This is Britain - a tolerant country that has always been inclusive,
even before equality legislation, and those that point out how
marvellous and unique a black or gay pm would be are as bigoted as those
who say there would never be a pm who was black or gay.
The majority of people in this country now believe that equality
practice does not include them and only applies to minorities (because
that is the way that the equality laws have been used), and that these
laws are actually excluding them, and this has to change. Cameron
talking this way just makes him sound even more like another Blair - we
do not want to hear that there is going to be even more 'equality'
pushes, because it invariably means that inequalities become even greater.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 04:54:40 -0700 (PDT), "sut...@googlemail.com" <...@googlemail.com
On Jul 2, 12:34 pm, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
Sadly, the reason why Cameron sounds a lot like Blair is that he has
realised the value of spin. Blair (with the help of Alastair Campbell)
could tell bare-faced lies and with a spin that was quite capable of
convincing the floating voters.
Cameron has now seen that the only way to get his lies across to the
electorate is to adopt the same "media-spin" ideas.
Poor Gordon lies just as much as Cameron and Blair, but just has no
idea how to do it properly, which is why he is laughed at a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:03:49 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
This is the problem - spin has muddied the waters so much that it's hard
to tell what any of them genuinely think. No wonder so few people turn
out at elections...
How about making spinning an offence equivalent to distributing racist
literature?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:35:05 +0100, "Hal Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
Good. I am glad to hear it! I probably misunderstood you. Sorry about that!
Mostly in the race to get votes I am sure.
Well, for the record, I AM anti-Muslim per se for many and various reasons.
The main one being that they are attempting to reduce this country to their
usual 3rd World slum and force us all to convert to Islam! Not on!! - I
agree wholeheartedly about what you say about Simon thing. Highly dangerous.
Not to mention that it is totally irrelevant in the scheme of things today.
Britain is indeed a tolerant country. It is also a largly Anglican country,
and long may it remain both those things.
Which is, of course, precisely why the BNP got in, and unless something is
done about immigration and the preferences shown to our Muslim brothers and
sisters versus our own countrymen, it will not be too long before we do
indeed have BNP MP's. So much for the Crusades! A total waste of effort. It
does appear to be the Muslims that are the main problem. Chinese and Indians
do not seem to be as provocative.
Your getting too deep for me!! - But why doesn't someone tell Cameron to
catch himself on? - Actually, they probably will, and may have already done
so. I suspect that he is trying to appear attractive to the Labour vote.
Again, appologies if I misunderstood you!
--
Harry Merrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 01:29:27 -0700 (PDT), Mike <...@aol.com
On 2 July, 01:06, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
What is the Tory policy on immigration? I've just about had enough of
Cameron's twisting and turning. It's exactly the same as BlaIr. All
things to all men. He's quoted in the mail as saying he intends to do
more for homos. What exactly? Priority in jobs perhaps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:36:07 +0100, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
This is the point - if it's not an issue as abelard says, why raise it?
All this equality stuff is so divisive and actually promotes inequality.
We are almost at the point of openly implementing affirmative action.
Why are none of them listening to what people are saying?
Why can't the government keep its nose out of issues of race and
religion and sex?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:16:24 +0100, "Hal Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
Because it is a government for ALL the people. Any government has to be so.
The people themselves are to blame for raising the issues in the first
place. The fact that those issues are mostly about minorities is, I fear, a
fact of life that we can do little about.
--
Harry Merrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:32:27 +0100, "Ivan" <...@yahoo.com
"Mike" <...@18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
Instead of using the military as a deterrent to round these people up and
make them seek asylum in the nearest 'safe' country to the third world
shitholes they came from, the UN has now decided to build them a f**ing
Butlin's style camp, you couldn't make it up, will it actually have to reach
the predicted point of 'rivers of blood' before this government or any other
wakes up to the fact that it's highly doubtful whether even the present
situation is going to be sustainable without serious problems within the
next 10 to 20 years, especially if we don't start to soon see definite signs
of a strong economic recovery.
"Squalid conditions and reports of outbreaks of violence, including a rape,
have prompted the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) to
establish a permanent presence in Calais."
For god's sake why do we need these people!
<http://english.ntdtv.com/ntdtv_en/ns_europe/2009-07-02/867512711576.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:02:07 +0100, Fred <...@Frednet.com
Why in Calais? Why aren't the French snapping up these people who we are
told are such a benefit to the economy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:24:58 +0100, "Ivan" <...@yahoo.com
"Fred" <...@bt.com...
"The U.N. Commission hopes to assist asylum seekers to cross the Channel to
England."
Along I suspect with of millions of others I've just about reached the end
of my tether, so much so that I'm determined to vote for the most radical
right wing party that puts up at the next election, as it doesn't seem that
any of the mainstream parties even want to discuss the insanity which they
appear to be turning a blind eye to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:12:11 +0100, "Hal Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
SFAIK he has not specifically said yet. One assumes that he is saving his
policies until nearer the election. I would suggest that he will follow the
lead of past Tory Governments and make it far more difficult.
NOT! Cameron IS a politician and he is doing what politicians do, from time
imemorial!
Well, if you "will" read the Mail!! ....... How could he improve a Gay
persons life by prioritising jobs? It seems they all mostly have very good
jobs, being mostly very high IQ.
--
Harry Merrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:53:35 -0700 (PDT), "w_s...@yahoo.co.uk" <...@yahoo.co.uk
On 2 July, 16:12, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
Being a rent boy isn't a good job or clever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:18:44 +0100, "Hal Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
And what percentage of gays are rent boys?? - I did say most have high IQ's
and "most" are in good jobs, meaning "not all". Anyhow, it seems that rent
boys and girls actually make plenty of money which they use, some of them,
to pay for their University courses. Otherwise they would be in regular jobs
of which there were many until recently.
--
Harry Merrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:17:29 +0100, John Bennett <...@bt.com
We've been ruled by a bunch of cunts for centuries.
Maggie Thatcher was unique in both having and being a cunt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:55:58 +0100, "Hal Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
Well there you go! Why not be at least civil in your langauge if nothing
else.
In fact, Maggie Thatcher was an excellent PM and was exactly right for her
time. She was, and still is, a true Patriot. She did huge work for the
benefit of the UK, not least forcing the Unions into line, which had to be
done. Undoubtedly, she lost touch in the end, but look how long it took her
befor she did! Just because you are a socialist should not decry her from a
just comment. Sadly, Labours record of excellent PM's is remarkably poor.
--
Harry Merrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:20:37 +0100, John Bennett <...@bt.com
She destroyed this country.
I can think of not one PM of this country who was not a cunt.
In days of yore the scythesman would have at his belt a sharpening stone
held in a leather purse.
The purse generally contained a mix of water and pork fat.
Of necessity it was tight to hold the stone in place.
The purse was called a "cunt" I'm quite sure even a puff would see the
conentations:-)
When the Bitch dies there will be street parties held all over Britain
if not the World.
You are a lucky man.
You are in a minority.
I am a bit to the right of Attila the Hun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:24:24 +0100, "Hal Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
No, your wrong, of course. It does seem that the school holidays have
started OK!! You are a vulgar little person with a mean and twisted brain
inundated with spitefull thoughts and rabid with hate and jealousy of not
having what others have. A kookie in other words.
No, your wrong. I am far from being a minority on this one. Maggie is one of
the best PM's we ever had.
--
Harry Merrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 01:35:47 -0700 (PDT), Logician <...@logicians.com
On Jul 2, 4:17 am, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
Try the BNP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 01:35:11 -0700 (PDT), Logician <...@logicians.com
On Jul 2, 3:48 am, Maria <...@theshoe.ac.uk
He is playing up to Obama but Obama hates gays.
Maybe Cameron is saying he is gay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 11:07:24 +0100, "Hal Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
No, Obama doesn't hate gays at all. He said so in his Inauguration speech!
Who know? He "did" go to Eton after all! Anyway, so what?
--
Harry Merrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 03:34:02 -0700 (PDT), Logician <...@logicians.com
On Jul 4, 11:07 am, "Hal Ó Mearadhaigh." <...@hotmail.com
The first one, or the second one?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|