|
|
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:00:49 +0200, Danny Costa <...@gmail.com
Madame (T) ha scritto:
Fatevi il Dianazene alzando piano piano la dose affinche la niacina non
fa diventare rossa (nel limite) la pelle, dopo ca 7 giorni la natura vi
ha messo un muro di berlino per le radiazioni.
http://www.google.com/search?q=Dianazene
sono solo vitamine non pillole colorate
Dianazene
But we are leading on this. We knew that old-time nicotinic acid
restimulated and ran out sunburns and that a person who had been given
nicotinic acid actually did not receive a continuous effect from it.
Anybody can make this test.
It happens that there is an incorrect entry in both the British and
American pharmacopoeias. It says that nicotinic acid-not
niacinamide—turns on a flush, and in overdose is therefore toxic. This
is not correct. People who have taken nicotinic acid in overdoses do get
red and prickly but one has to take about 90 grains to kill oneself.
It is fascinating that there could be this insufficient information. It
could be that people don't look because that isn't what it does at all.
In a large number of cases it doesn't turn on flushes but turns on
hives, gastroenteritis, aching bones, or a fearful, terrified condition
which is not a physical reaction at all. Here is a variable reaction
from something toxic-and notice that it turns on the conditions brought
about by atomic radiation.
What sort of a toxic pill is this which when administered over a period
of time is no longer toxic even though all the time it is being
administered it is above toleration? The body cannot tolerate the amount
that is being administered but after a while it no longer has any
effect. Unless one knows Dianetics and Scientology this doesn't seem to
make much sense.
Nicotinic acid runs out, abolishes, sunburns—and that is the simple
answer to this question. When it is given to a person, he gets sunburns
he has already had before and turns as red as a beet. Keep him on a
regimented dose every day and after a while two things will happen: one,
he no longer gets sick when nicotinic acid is administered to him and,
two, he doesn't have a bad reaction from sunburn.
We have made the test with sunlamps and found that a person's liability
to being burned is decreased by the administration of nicotinic acid and
the running out of past burns. This, therefore, is true of this type of
radiation illness.
I conducted several experiments in 1950 which were in total disagreement
with the pharmacopoeia, but any medical doctor or biochemist could make
the same experiments. One would administer 200 mg nicotinic acid per day
to somebody and see all the manifestations I have spoken earlier, turn
on, eventually disappear and not recur until one has administered about
500 mg per day, which will turn it all on again, but much less this
time. Then one gives this person 1,000 mg per day for several days and
finds that there is just a small reaction after which one administers
2,000 mg per day and Finds no more effects. One can thus feed people
this toxic drug without any effect whatsoever.
Remembering this series of experiments I made in 1950 I again looked
them up in the files of the Hubbard Dianetic Research Foundation. More
recently we got some brave volunteer who took nicotinic acid over a
period of a couple of weeks and sure enough our old experiments were
bearing out with one exception: the reactions per dose were five and six
times more violent than they had been in 1950!
I then got hold of some of the people who were given nicotinic acid in
1950 and they took the same course all over again. They got a little
sick in their stomachs but were better off than other people and they
got an entirely different reaction.
In order to make the intake of nicotinic acid more effective, I did more
experimenting and eventually combined it with vitamins and other
minerals and finally produced a formula called Dianazene.
The Formula for Dianazene
Nicotinic Acid200 mg.
Iron Ferrous Gluconate10 grains.
Vitamin B125 mg.
Vitamin B2 -Riboflavin50 mg.
Vitamin C-Ascorbic Acid200 to 500 mg.
Dicalcium Phosphate15 to 20 grains.
It should be taken daily, all at the same time, with milk and chocolate.
But it is not the best solution. It is a cure. It does something and it
can eventually be run out with Scientology. But if we didn't have
anything else Dianazene might serve the purpose very well in a limited
sense.
Dianazene runs out radiation—or what appears to be radiation. It also
proofs a person up against radiation in some degree. I have seen it run
out skin cancer. A man who didn't have much liability to skin cancer
(only had a few moles) took Dianazene. His whole jaw turned into a raw
mass of cancer. He kept on taking Dianazene and it disappeared after a
while. I was looking at a case of cancer that might have happened.
There is another instance of somebody who had a little bit of colitis
which worried him slightly from time to time. After taking Dianazene he
started to bleed from the intestines. He kept on taking this formula and
came out without colitis. He may have been facing an eventual colitis of
a fatal nature-hemorrhages.
The whole point in taking Dianazene is to keep taking it until bad
effects vanish.
As the level of food intake from country to country varies, it is
important that people who don't eat regular wholesome food take milk and
chocolate with this preparation, otherwise they get a very poor reaction
to it. I found that if one took milk and chocolate with it—or milk and
glucose-it worked much better. In other words, the people who are the
poorest fed would evidently be the most susceptible to radiation.
However, there could be thousands of other factors involved. If we are
alert there is no reason to worry about radiation at this time
particularly. But there is the same old worry about the case and health
level of the peoples of the Earth, and if we continue along in this same
direction, we would also win in the face of radiation. Who knows that we
wouldn't get a plague tomorrow that would wipe out nations. I assure you
that it would be the people who are worried and are in a bad state of
health who would go down first.
If one wanted to get the better of the plague, whether man or bug made,
one should be audited by Scientology technologies. That seems to me
about all I could say offhand that one might find of use in the
understanding and handling of atomic radiation.
Nuclear Radiation
The effects of radiations depend basically on their property of
rendering atoms in their path electrically charged. This is called
ionization. The immediate result in the molecules, of which the ionized
atoms are part, is increased chemical activity and a tendency to break
up. Thus the living structure of the cell is altered or destroyed, and
poisonous waste products may be formed. These changes, if on a
sufficiently large scale, and in vital organs, can cause the death of
the whole body.
The ionizing power of radiation depends on its energy. Alpha and beta
particles are far more effective than gamma rays, but fortunately have
very little penetrating power. Neutrons have quite high ionizing power,
and penetrate easily as well. Dosages of radiation are measured in terms
of total ionization, the unit being the "roentgen" (r). It is difficult
to gain any subjective appreciation of what is meant by a dose of say
500 r, but the following observations give some idea:-The lethal dose
for a human being, if received uniformly over the whole body, is about
750 r. That is to say, that such a dose could be expected to kill 100%
of persons exposed to it, and is called an LD100 dose. It would be
received by a person standing in the open at about 800 yards from ground
zero in the case of a nominal bomb blast. An amount of 450 r, such as
would be received up to 1,300 yards or so, would kill about 50% of
persons exposed; it is thus an LD50 dose. Less than 200 r is not
ordinarily fatal, unless the victim is already weakened from some other
cause, or has received burns or blast injury as well.
About 50% of people exposed to a single dose of 200 r, however, could
become quite ill, and might take anything up to three months to recover.
100 r produces about 10% sickness only, and less than 50 r in one dose
can be taken as relatively harmless, provided there is no further
exposure for many weeks, at least.
It will be obvious from the above that a good deal of individual
variation occurs, but beyond the observation that the very young, the
old, and the ill are more sensitive than normal, nothing is known of the
reasons for the variations.
Much greater amounts of radiation than the above can be tolerated, if
directed to specific parts of the body only, as for example in
radiotherapy for cancer. On the other hand, much smaller doses,
delivered to the whole body, do produce some ill effects, and
furthermore, accumulate over a period of time. The sensitivity of human
tissues decreases in this order: lymphatic tissue, testis, bone marrow
(blood forming tissue), epithelium (lining) of the stomach and
intestines, ovary. Brain and muscle are the least sensitive of all, and
other tissues fall in between the two ranges. 1000 r to brain only is
not lethal. On the other hand, 0.2 r per day over a period has been
known to depress blood formation in workers with X-rays. The maximum
safe continuous rate of irradiation for such people is now considered to
be about 0.1 per day for five days a week. While a total dose
accumulated over a long period is not as dangerous as the same dose
given in a short time, radiation effects do nevertheless accumulate. In
actual fact 60 r spread over three weeks is no more effective than 20 r
as a single rapid dose. Nevertheless the expectation of life for
radiologists, as observed in the U.S.A., is about five years less than
that for others, and the incidence of leukemia in this group may be as
high as ten times that in the whole population.
Death from irradiation may occur from several immediate causes,
according to the dose received. Huge doses of many thousands of roentgen
cause death from brain damage within a few hours. Death from an LD100 is
usually due to destruction of the intestines and occurs in about 7-10
days. Smaller doses such as an LD50 may produce the same effect, or the
victim may die from failure of blood manufacture in 4-6 weeks or so. If
this period is survived recovery normally occurs, though the chronic
risks remain, even with very small doses. Thus a number of victims can
be expected to die after years from, for example, leukemia.
The general pattern of radiation disease from a rapid exposure is as
follows:—The primary symptoms . . . nausea, diarrhea and particularly
vomiting appear in 2-24 hours, and may last 2-14 days or so. Secondary
symptoms . . . fever, bleeding under the skin and from orifices, loss of
hair and more diarrhea appear after an interval of some few days up to
several weeks. The earlier the onset of symptoms of either type, and the
longer they last, the worse is the outlook for the patient, and an
indication is thereby given of the dose received. Loss of hair and
bleeding in the first week are the gravest signs; death is certain.
Most of the available data regarding the biological effects of radiation
has been derived from observations made in Japan, during, and since 1945
supplemented by a growing body of evidence from animal experiments.
Owing to the obvious impossibility of direct research on human beings,
however, the picture is still far from complete.
Long Term View
The long term effects in survivors of the bombing in Japan, as observed
by an international group of physicians in 1955, give food for thought,
and will be detailed briefly here.
The most serious matter in the opinion of the writer is the persistence
of vague ill health, tiredness, increased susceptibility to infections
and other common disorders, and mental fear or apathy. By the word
persistence a term of years is meant. Evidence has been adduced
indicating that physical and mental retardation of growth occurred in
children who survived the bombings. This, on the larger scale of global
war, could only have the most serious consequences for the human race.
Leukemia and other blood disorders, most of them invariably fatal, are
still appearing in survivors at a considerably higher rate than in
unexposed populations, though the peak year was 1950. Cataracts are also
relatively more common; these, incidentally, are thought to be due
possibly to neutron irradiation in particular; further, their
distribution has suggested that the range of neutrons may be much
greater than is commonly accepted.
Many male survivors have become sterile as a result of exposure to
radiation and an additional rather alarming figure is the increase in
major congenital malformations among the children of those people who
retained fertility. An increase by 72% on the rate common in unexposed
populations was found. That is to say, there have been nearly twice as
many abnormalities in the children of these survivors as one would find
among an average group.
The above observations refer, of course, to people who received a single
large dose. What of the effects of small repeated doses spread over many
years?
Some investigations carried out recently in the U.S.A. on a number of
radiologists revealed some interesting facts:
The average life span of this particular group of doctors was five years
less than that of other doctors, and of the general population (60 years
compared with 65 years).
The incidence of fatal leukemias was eight or nine times higher than
that in nonradiologist doctors.
The average number of children born to members of the group was about
half that found with other physicians (1.7 compared with 3).
Finally, there were 24% (one quarter) more congenital abnormalities
among children of radiologists than among those of other doctors.
The group considered must have received, due to occupational hazard,
perhaps as much as 1000 r over a whole lifetime in some cases, though in
others probably very much less. This is a large amount compared with
what an average individual receives. The figures nevertheless illustrate
clearly the menace of chronic irradiation.
Every person during his or her life is continually bombarded with
radiation in small quantities. Radioactive substances are everywhere
present, though in minute amounts and cosmic rays from outer space
contribute to the total "background" radiation. This normally amounts to
about 1.5 r in every 10 years, 9-10 r during a whole lifetime. In
addition, diagnostic X-ray procedures give a certain dose to the
subject. The average total receipt from this source is very difficult to
estimate, but may be, for the reproductive tissues (gonads)
specifically, about 3 r in 30 years.
The effect of chronic irradiation seems to be similar to the process of
ageing, to the extent that each roentgen is thought to shorten life by
about a ten-thousandth. This in an average human being would only amount
to a total of a few weeks due to background dosage. The general debility
and increased liability to infections, already referred to, while less
dramatic, present a far more serious prospect in terms of world health
and working capacity.
Genetic Effects
Nuclear radiation does not produce monstrosities in babies just like
that. This all too common idea is mere superstition.
The reproductive tissues of all living organisms produce naturally a
certain number of "mutations"; that is, hereditary patterns in sperm or
egg cells which differ to a greater or lesser extent from the normal for
that species. Most of these result in infertility of the cell concerned,
and they therefore never actually appear in offspring. Nearly all the
remainder produce deleterious abnormalities. (Beneficial changes are
rare.) All that irradiation does to the gonads in doses insufficient to
kill the cells, is to increase the rate of production of mutations. A
total amount of about 50 r received by an individual during his or her
reproductive lifetime would double the total number of mutations
produced during this period. Most of the changes, while deleterious, are
also "recessive." In other words, they may not appear in one or several
generations but will eventually.
However, to take a very possible example, it is suggested that a total
dose of I Or (in addition to "background") to every person in the U.S.A.
might well cause the actual appearance of 50,000 cases of inherited
defect, over and above the present "normal" number (2%) in children of
the first generation born thereafter. Continuing this rate of dosage to
succeeding generations, the figure would increase, ultimately reaching a
steady half-million per generation. Such a situation would pose a
considerable social problem. A universal dose (U.S.A.) of only I r could
produce several thousand cases of definite, if not obvious, handicap in
the first generation. These figures, if expanded to cover the whole
population of this planet, evidence the danger to which mankind is now
exposing itself.
The situation cannot obviously be assessed fully at the present time.
There may be a considerable error, one way or the other, with estimated
figures, but the danger must not be ignored merely on this account.
How much is man-made radioactivity actually contributing at the present
time to the total receipts of radiation by humans at large? Taking
external radiation only, due to "fallout," wastes from atomic plants,
etc., the probable amount is less than half a roentgen in 30 years to
any individual. If weapon testing were to continue at a higher rate,
equal to the maximum recorded so far for any one year, perhaps double
this figure might be close to the truth.
This does not sound very much, and by itself is not. But taking into
account increasing use of medical X-rays, and the very uncertain factor
of internal radiation, the outlook is not quite optimistic. As already
mentioned, a human being living in a western country receives about 3 r
to the gonads from medical X-ray procedures on the average. Some
individuals, of course, receive much more. A routine abdominal X-ray
involves a total dose of I r per exposure, of which a proportion reaches
the gonads. More prolonged investigations may deliver doses of 10-20 r.
Since every least amount of radiation received produces more mutations,
there is good reason to be concerned that exposure from all sources
should be kept down to the barest minimum.
Internal Radioactivity
The danger of actually taking into the body radioactive substances has
been referred to. It is illustrated by the fact, observed before
radioactivity was discovered, that of uranium miners at Joachimsthal in
Bohemia, more than 50% died of cancer of the lung. This was later found
to be due to the continuous inhalation of a radioactive gas and
radioactive dust.
Most of the products of an atomic explosion decay very rapidly, so that
only the longer lived ones can contaminate more remote parts of the
world. No such dramatic effects as that in the miners are to be
expected. The most important substance appears to be an element called
radiostrontium (strontium 90).
It loses half its activity in twenty years, and being chemically similar
to calcium, tends to accumulate in bone, once absorbed. Furthermore, it
is very difficult to remove once fixed in bone. Its presence can be a
direct cause of cancer of the bone, and blood diseases, such as
leukemia, can result from its action on bone marrow. In this situation,
since the radiation source is so close to the living cells, the gamma
and beta ray activity becomes important. Strontium 90 produces in
particular beta and gamma rays.
It has been put forward that the quantity of radiostrontium in human
bones at the present time is about 1:10,000th of the "maximum
permissible amount." This does not allow, however, for several important
factors. Firstly, atomic weapon tests are continuing; secondly,
subsidence of dust from the upper atmosphere continues for long after a
test. The effect is therefore delayed. These two items may well reduce
the apparent safety margin, in the figure given, by 10-20 times. Next,
the rate of uptake in children, particularly those younger than four
years, is three times greater than the average. Children are also more
sensitive to radiation than adults (a characteristic of growing
tissues). Furthermore, the value for "the maximum permissible amount"
taken in the above estimate is actually that permitted for persons
occupationally in contact with radiations. The figure for the whole
population should probably be at least ten times less.
These considerations practically annul the safety margin. Other
substances known as carbon 14 and iodine 131, also unfissioned
plutonium, appear too in appreciable amounts. When all these are taken
into account, the situation appears indeed serious. The reader is now
referred again to the final paragraphs of Chapter One.
Glossary
Aberration, a departure from rational thought or behavior. From the
Latin, aberrare, to wander from; Latin, ab, away, errare, to wander. It
means basically to err, to make mistakes, or more specifically to have
fixed ideas which are not true. The word is also used in its scientific
sense. It means departure from a straight line. If a line should go from
A to B, then if it is "aberrated" it would go from A to some other
point, to some other point, to some other point, to some other point, to
some other point and finally arrive at B. Taken in its scientific sense,
it would also mean the lack of straightness or to see crookedly as, in
example, a man sees a horse but thinks he sees an elephant. Aberrated
conduct would be wrong conduct, or conduct not supported by reason.
AOSH DK, Advanced Organization-Saint Hill, Denmark. A Scientology
organization in Denmark which delivers advanced courses in Scientology.
Auditing, same as processing.
Auditor, Scientology processing is done on the principle of making an
individual look at his own existence, and improve his ability to
confront what he is and where he is. An auditor is the person trained in
the technology and whose job it is to ask the person to look, and get
him to do so. The word auditor is used because it means one who listens,
and a Scientology auditor does listen.
Close Terminals, the greatest ability of thought is DIFFERENTIATION. So
long as one can differentiate, one is sane. Its opposite is
IDENTIFICATION. When one begins to identify, one has "closed terminals"
too closely, and believes one terminal is another terminal.
Dianetics, a system of coordinated axioms which resolve problems
concerning human behavior and psychosomatic illnesses.
E-Meter, Hubbard Electrometer. An electronic instrument for measuring
mental state and change of state in individuals, as an aid to precision
and speed in auditing. The E-Meter is not intended or effective for the
diagnosis, treatment or prevention of any disease.
Genetic Blueprint, the plans of construction of a new body in the
orthodox manner of conception, birth and growth.
Grant Beingness, the ability to assume or grant (give, allow) beingness
is probably the highest of human virtues. It is even more important to
be able to permit (allow) other people to have beingness than to be able
oneself to assume it.
Group Auditing, the application of certain Scientology processes to a
group of people by a trained practitioner.
No-Game Condition, life is a game. A game consists of freedom, barriers
and purposes. This is a scientific fact, not merely an observation.
Freedom exists amongst barriers. A totality of barriers and a totality
of freedom alike are no-game conditions. Each is similarly cruel. Each
is similarly purposeless.
Postulate, a self-created truth would be simply the consideration
generated by self. Well, we just borrow the word which is in seldom use
in the English language, we call that postulate. And we mean by
postulate, self-created truth. He posts something. He puts something up
and that's what a postulate is.
Processes, Scientology is employed by an auditor (a Scientology
practitioner) upon individuals or small or large groups of people, in
their presence. The auditor makes these people, at their choice, do
various exercises, and these exercises (processes) bring about changes
for the better in intelligence, behavior and general competence.
Processing, the principle of making an individual look at his own
existence, and improve his ability to confront what he is and where he is.
Restimulation, the reactivation of a past memory due to similar
circumstances in the present approximating circumstances of the past.
Run Out, erase.
Scientology, the term SCIENTOLOGY is taken from scio (knowing in the
fullest meaning of the word) and ology (to study). It is an applied
religious philosophy dealing with the study of knowledge, which through
the application of its technology, can bring about desirable changes in
the conditions of life. Scientology, used by the trained and relatively
untrained person, improves the intelligence, ability, behavior, skill
and appearance of people.
tratto dal libro digitale gratuito:
ALL ABOUT RADIATION by A NUCLEAR PHYSICIST and A MEDICAL DOCTOR
|