 |
|
 |
|
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:27:39 -0500, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" <...@mvps.org
The decision should be based on how you want the text to behave relative to
the tables. If you insert section breaks in order to make the tables inline,
the text in column 1 will be continued in column 2 above the table, then
resume in column 1 below the table. If you insert the table wrapped
(floating), the text in column 1 above the table will continue in column 1
below the table before snaking to column 2:
Inline
Text 1 Text 2
Table Table Table
Text 3 Text 4
Floating
Text 1 Text 3
Table Table Table
Text 2 Text 4
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org
"Mark Tangard" <...@[__remove.this.to.reply__]speakeasy.netmessage news...@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 23:47:26 -0800, Mark Tangard <...@[__remove.this.to.reply__]speakeasy.net
Hi Suzanne,
I should've added one detail that makes this consideration moot: the tables will
all be placed at the top or bottom of the page.
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:07:49 GMT, "PamC via OfficeKB.com" <u43222@uwe
I avoid using floating/wrapping objects until after editing and reviews
because even light copyediting can change the object's position, and
substantive reviews nearly always do. Also, if the tables need to break
across pages, in-line would be better.
PamC
--
Message posted via http://www.officekb.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:38:58 -0500, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" <...@mvps.org
I'd agree on both points, with the caveats mentioned in my earlier post.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org
"PamC via OfficeKB.com" <...@uwe...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:04:01 -0800, Mark Tangard <...@[__remove.this.to.reply__]speakeasy.net
Hi Pam. Yes, I'm generally of the same mind; but this is a case of only very
light editing -- mostly just changing a few numbers in the tables and a few
words in the text; so our goal in choosing between the two methods is to
maximize the file's stability through many saves (probably dozens daily over the
course of a few years), given it'll be a very large file and may have several
hundred "sections" which in itself can make a file temperamental.
To answer your earlier question, yes, it's likely to be very very long, perhaps
thousands of pages. All tables will be the same size and structure, none will be
long enough to break across pages, and all will be formatted to ensure they don't.
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:23:56 -0800, Mark Tangard <...@[__remove.this.to.reply__]speakeasy.net
Agh, sorry, just realized the question on length wasn't from Pam, but from
grammatim.
So gang, given that the text-wrapping pattern Suzanne mentioned isn't an issue
for this doc (see earlier post), which method do you think would give us the
most, um, emotionally secure file?
MT
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:22:40 -0400, Jay Freedman <...@verizon.net
My vote would be for section breaks.
Floating objects of any kind far too easily move out of position, either with a
stray mouse move or "just because they can". We've seen floating things move to
odd locations, and even disappear because they were outside the boundaries of
any page.
As I know you're aware, a project of this sort demands frequent and multiple
backups. It would even be advisable to run a periodic check of the backups to
verify that they're trustworthy -- there's nothing worse than corrupting a
document and then finding that the backup is also corrupt.
--
Regards,
Jay Freedman
Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all
may benefit.
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:23:56 -0800, Mark Tangard
<...@[__remove.this.to.reply__]speakeasy.net
>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:40:58 -0700, Mark Tangard <...@speakeasy.net
Thanks, Jay, that's what we needed to hear.
>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 05:59:45 -0700 (PDT), grammatim <...@verizon.net
What are you calling "very, very long"? Some people posting here say
that a 100-page document is "very, very long," but it wouldn't be
problematic in the least.
I'd appreciate knowing how you "float" a table, which is something
built into FrameMaker but I have never discovered in Word.
On Apr 12, 3:06 am, Mark Tangard <...@[__remove.this.to.reply__]
speakeasy.net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:43:22 -0400, Jay Freedman <...@verizon.net
At the risk of going somewhat off-topic:
The easy way: When the mouse pointer hovers over the table, a small square
containing a 4-way arrow appears off the northwest corner of the table. If you
drag that square, the table becomes a floating object.
The harder way: Go to the Table Properties dialog and click the Around button
under Text Wrapping. Also, once the table is floating, the None button in the
dialog is the only way to get it in-line again.
--
Regards,
Jay Freedman
Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all
may benefit.
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 05:59:45 -0700 (PDT), grammatim <...@verizon.netwrote:
>> MT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:50:50 -0700 (PDT), grammatim <...@verizon.net
Oh -- that's something different. In FrameMaker, when you make
something Float, it goes to the top of the next page (next column) if
it won't fit on the page its anchor is on, and the text flows around
it. Since Word isn't page-oriented, I don't expect it can do that.
On Apr 12, 11:43 am, Jay Freedman <...@verizon.net> >> MT-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:58:31 -0400, Jay Freedman <...@verizon.net
Well, you already knew that Microsoft subscribes to the Red Queen school of word
definitions. ;-)
You're correct, in Word the text does not flow from after a 'floating' object to
fill the space before it.
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:50:50 -0700 (PDT), grammatim <...@verizon.netwrote:
>> >> MT-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:04:01 -0400, Jay Freedman <...@verizon.net
And of course it was Humpty Dumpty, not the Red Queen. I hate when that happens.
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:58:31 -0400, Jay Freedman <...@verizon.netwrote:
>>> >> MT-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:13:39 -0500, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" <...@mvps.org
Well, the Red Queen is appropriate, too, if you like doing impossible things
before breakfast.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org
"Jay Freedman" <...@4ax.com...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:13:06 -0500, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" <...@mvps.org
Actually, text does flow around the floating object (both back and forth);
you just can't have a full-page floating object.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org
"Jay Freedman" <...@4ax.com...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:11:07 -0400, Jay Freedman <...@verizon.net
OK, I was a bit imprecise.
The text will flow back before the picture only within the same page. In the
situation grammatim described, Word will _not_ backfill the empty space at the
bottom of the page that originally contained the anchor paragraph; both the
paragraph and the picture move to the next page. To let it backfill the
preceding page, you have to manually move the anchor to a later paragraph.
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:13:06 -0500, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" <...@mvps.orgwrote:
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:47:39 -0500, "Suzanne S. Barnhill" <...@mvps.org
I use wrapped objects so seldom that I have to think about how I've handled
that when I have used them, and I guess, as you say, I've moved the anchor.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org
"Jay Freedman" <...@4ax.com...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|