Omgili, forum search, forums search, search forums, discussion search,discussions search, search discussions, board search, boards search, search boards
  Advanced Search

Bob Dylan interview Part 4

On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:56:14 -0700 (PDT), Rachel <...@aol.com

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/bob-dylan/5148025/Bob-Dylan-interview- with-Bill-Flanagan.html

Bob Dylan, interview with Bill Flanagan
In a Telegraph online exclusive, Bob Dylan reveals what he thinks
about The Rolling Stones, Nazis and the difference between actors and
singers.

Interview by Bill Flanagan
Last Updated: 11:12AM BST 13 Apr 2009

Dylan: 'Those fifties and sixties records were definitely important.
That might have been the last great age of real music'
Bob Dylan rarely gives interviews and when he does they are rarely
revealing. But in the run up to the release of his 33rd album,
Together Through Life, he has been engaged in a long and fascinating
conversation with leading US rock critic and MTV producer, Bill
Flanagan. In three previously released extracts (available to read on
http://www.bobdylan.com) Dylan spoke about his love for the accordion,
distrust of politicians, his concerns about the fate of Barack Obama,
his experiences with the ghosts of the American civil war and his own
role as an itinerant truth seeker.

Here, on playful, teasing form, a simple question about former
wrestler turned Governor of Minnesota leads to some tongue-in-cheek
criticism of The Rolling Stones, a discussion of the difference
between actors and singers and Dylan's bafflement at the appeal of
Adolf Hitler. With his weary acknowledgement that Hitler "knew
something, he knew that people didn't think" and distrust of charisma
and "the torch of the spoken word" that filled the graves of Europe in
the Second World War, it adds up to a revealing insight into the
greatest singer-songwriter of our times.

Bill Flanagan: Getting back to politics, what did you think of Jesse
Ventura, being a Minnesotan and all?

Bob Dylan: He did some good things or tried to. I never met him. All I
know about the governor is that he’s a Rolling Stones fan.

BF: Your old cohorts?

BD: I hear from Keith once in a while but that’s about it.

BF: What do you think of the Stones?

BD: What do I think of them? They’re pretty much finished, aren’t
they?

BF: They had a gigantic tour last year. You call that finished?

BD: Oh yeah, you mean Steel Wheels. I’m not saying they don’t keep
going, but they need Bill. Without him they’re a funk band. They’ll be
the real Rolling Stones when they get Bill back.

BF: Bob, you’re stuck in the 80’s.

BD: I know. I’m trying to break free.

BF: Do you really think the Stones are finished?

BD: Of course not, They’re far from finished. The Rolling Stones are
truly the greatest rock and roll band in the world and always will be.
The last too. Everything that came after them, metal, rap, punk, new
wave, pop-rock, you name it …. you can trace it all back to the
Rolling Stones. They were the first and the last and no one’s ever
done it better.

BF: This Dream of You has this wonderful South of the Border feel, but
at the same time, I detect echoes of Sam Cooke, the Coasters, the
Brill Building, and Phil Spector. Were those records from the 50's and
60's important to you? Did you try to capture some of that flavor in
This Dream of You?

BD: Those fifties and sixties records were definitely important. That
might have been the last great age of real music. Since then or maybe
the seventies it's all been people playing computers. Sam Cooke, the
Coasters, Phil Spector, all that music was great but it didn’t exactly
break into my consciousness.

Back then I was listening to Son House, Leadbelly, the Carter family,
Memphis Minnie and death romance ballads. As far as songwriting, I
wanted to write songs like Woody Guthrie and Robert Johnson. Timeless
and eternal. Only a few of those radio ballads still hold up and most
of them have Doc Pomus’ hand in them. Spanish Harlem, Save the Last
Dance for Me, Little Sister … a few others. Those were fantastic
songs. Doc was a soulful cat. If you said there was a little bit of
him in This Dream of You I would take it as a compliment.

BF: Even though many of the tracks on the album are about love, the
album is full of pain – sometimes in the same song. In Beyond Here
Lies Nothing, the song is underscored by a feeling of foreboding.
You’re moving down "boulevards of broken cars.” You’re going to love
"as long as love will last.” Is pain a necessary part of loving?

BD: Oh yeah, in my songs it is. Pain, sex, murder, family - it goes
way back. Kindness. Honour. Charity. You have to tie all that in.
You’re supposed to know that stuff.

BF: Getting back to This Dream of You , the character sings, “How long
can I stay in this nowhere café?” Where is that café?

BD: It sounds like it’s south of the border or close to the border.

BF: You’re not saying?

BD: Well, no, it’s not like I’m not saying. But if you have those kind
of thoughts and feelings you know where the guy is. He’s right where
you are. If you don’t have those thoughts and feelings then he doesn’t
exist.

BF: The character in the song reminds me a lot of the guy who is in
the song Across The Borderline.

BD: I know what you’re saying, but it’s not a character like in a book
or a movie. He’s not a bus driver. He doesn’t drive a forklift. He’s
not a serial killer. It’s me who’s singing that, plain and simple. We
shouldn’t confuse singers and performers with actors. Actors will say,
“My character this, and my character that.” Like beating a dead horse.
Who cares about the character? Just get up and act. You don’t have to
explain it to me.

BF: Well can’t a singer act out a song?

BD: Yeah sure, a lot of them do. But the more you act the further you
get away from the truth. And a lot of those singers lose who they are
after a while. You sing, “I’m a lineman for the county,” enough times
and you start to scamper up poles.

BF: What actor could you hear singing This Dream of You?

BD: Gosh I don’t know, James Cagney, Mickey Rooney

BF: How about Humphrey Bogart?

BD: Yeah, sure, him too. Funny thing about actors and that identity
thing. Every time I run into Val Kilmer, I can’t help myself. I say,
“Why, Johnny Ringo - you look like somebody just walked on your
grave.” Val always says, “Bob, I’m not Johnny Ringo. That’s just a
role I played in a movie." He could be right, he could be wrong. I
think he’s wrong but he says it in such a sincere way. You have to
think he thinks he’s right.

BF: Do you think actors have to be sincere?

BD: Not at all. Mae West wasn’t. She was just who she was on the
screen. Just like Jimmy Stewart and Burt Lancaster.

BF: And Johnny Weissmuller.

BD: Yeah, Lon Chaney, too.

BF: Could that mean that Alec Guinness is Hitler?

BD: Well sure, a part of him is. But of course he’s not Hitler. And
neither is anybody else. Hitler was Hitler.

BF: Do you remember images of Hitler from growing up?

BD: No, not growing up. He was dead by the time I was four or five. I
never had a real understanding of that.

BF: Never had an understanding of what?

BD: How you take a failed landscape painter and turn him into a
fanatical mad man who controls millions. That’s some trick. I mean the
powers that created him must have been awesome.

BF: Well, the social and economic conditions of the Weimar Republic
were so different than now.

BD: Yeah sure, looking back in hindsight, you can see that someone
would have to take control. But still, it’s so perplexing. Like why
him? You could see that the man’s a total mutt. No Aryan
characteristics whatsoever. You couldn’t guess his ancestry. Brown
hair, brown eyes, pasty complexion, no particular type of stature,
Hitler mustache, raincoat, riding whip, the whole works. He knew
something. He knew that people didn’t think. Look at the faces of the
millions who worshipped him and you see that he inspired love. It’s
scary and sad. The torch of the spoken word. They were glad to follow
him anywhere, loyal to the bone. Then of course, he filled up the
cemeteries with them.

BF: It brings to mind Hitler talking to the crowd in Triumph of the
Will by Leni Riefenstahl.

BD: Yeah, it’s clear as day.

Together Through Life is released on April 27 on Columbia Records. To
order the CD visit amazon.co.uk.

Bob Dylan tours the UK in April/May 2009. For more information, and to
read the rest of Bob Dylan's conversation with Bill Flanagan, visit
http://www.bobdylan.com.



On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:05:35 -0700 (PDT), Mark Scalise <...@gmail.com

On Apr 13, 9:56 am, Rachel <...@aol.com

You left out the best part!

BF: Do you look at any of the online newsgroups that discuss your
material?

BD: Of course, all the time. I'm very interested in what people have
to say about me, and I'm always looking for suggestions on what songs
to play.

On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:05:47 -0700 (PDT), Jumbo <...@cupolagallery.com

On Apr 13, 2:56 pm, Rachel <...@aol.com
Thanks for forwarding that, Rachel. It's handy to have it here.

On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:24:00 -0700 (PDT), chris <...@aol.com

Thank you Rachel.

This statement is so true of all of Bob's work..you either get it, or
you don't.
" But if you have those kind of thoughts and feelings you know where
the guy is. He’s right where you are. If you don’t have those thoughts
and feelings then he doesn’t exist. "

This small group of works, love it...
" The torch of the spoken word."


Anonymous Wrote:

On Apr 13, 9:56 am, Rachel <...@aol.com
This is interview is interesting. It clears up without equivocation
an old discussion I remember being waged on this ng about singer vs.
narrator. As I recall, Mr. Jinx was pretty firmly in the latter
camp.


On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:11:00 GMT, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com

on this ng about singer vs. narrator.

What's cleared up?


Anonymous Wrote:

On Apr 13, 11:11 pm, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com
What do you mean, "what's cleared up?"

On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:20:18 GMT, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com

I'm not sure what you feel has been clarified without equivocation.


Anonymous Wrote:

On Apr 13, 11:20 pm, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com...

Well, didn't I say? Narr vs singer. What the fellow's saying in the
interview is that he is singing as himself, not narrating in the guise
of someone else. Not acting, better said. So he won't end up
shinnying up phone poles.

On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:04:39 GMT, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com

interview is that he is singing as himself, not narrating in the guise of
someone else. Not acting, better said. So he won't end up shinnying up
phone poles.

So he'll end up stabbing people to death instead. Glad we cleared that up
without equivocation. By the way, Jimmy Stewart isn't simply himself on the
screen. He is simultaneously himself and the character. It seems that
Dylan has confused a natural style of acting and personal appeal with
non-acting.


Anonymous Wrote:

On Apr 14, 1:04 am, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com
Whatever point you're trying to make isn't coming through. I was glad
that the singer in the interview cleared up a one time debate in this
ng, and pretty unequivocally, I might add.

On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:24:09 -0700, Martin Grossman <...@mindspring.com

Using what Dylan says in interviews as a guide to what he really
believes is dicey at best... and what the narrator in his songs says
often would make no sense if he himself meant it... same with actors...

--
Martin Grossman

Anonymous Wrote:

....On Apr 14, 2:24 am, Martin Grossman
<...@mindspring.com
I figured it wouldn't be very long before someone asserted that it
wasn't really him talking in the interview, just a narrator. His
songs support what he maintains, not the other way around.


On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:53:03 -0700, Martin Grossman <...@mindspring.com

I'm not sure what you mean when you say "his songs support what he
maintains"... but I am interested in finding what you are trying to
say... surely, what he"maintains" is malleable... it's one of the things
that keeps him interesting.... unlike, say, a Sean Hannity or Keith
Olbermann... and he says cryptic things much better than a Neil Young or
Tom Petty... and he's no Barry MacGuire or even some monotonous rapper...

--
Martin Grossman

Anonymous Wrote:

On Apr 14, 11:53 am, Martin Grossman <...@mindspring.comwrote:

Barry McGuire---you mean, "This Letter's Postmarked Vietnam?" THAT
Barry McGuire?


On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:06:31 -0700, Martin Grossman <...@mindspring.com

I guess I'm not tapped in enough to BM to recognize the song you
mention. Did hear he became a Christian music guy at some point,
though--after the laughable "Eve of Destruction."

--
Martin Grossman

On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:46:06 -0700, really real <...@shaw.ca

I never much liked Eve of Destruction, even when it was done by P.F.
Sloan, but I wouldn't call Barry McGuire's version laughable.

McGuire's Eve of Destruction was a phenomenon, a watered down Dylan
style protest song becoming a huge hit. It was lamentable, but not
laughable.

On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:52:29 -0700, Martin Grossman <...@mindspring.com

The over-the-top feel of it and the blustery voice always made me laugh
out loud. Not one of the folkies I hung with could hear it without
cracking up.

--
Martin Grossman

On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:05:51 -0400, rwalker <...@despammed.com

On Apr 14, 11:53 am, Martin Grossman <...@mindspring.com
That would be Barry Saddler (also sung "Ballad of the Green Berets.")
Barry McGuire was "Eve of Destruction."

Anonymous Wrote:

On Apr 14, 9:05 pm, rwalker <...@despammed.com
Of course! McGuire. That's the guy who tells you over and over and
over and over and over and OVER again. He must be from that group for
people who can't shut up: Onandonandon.

On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:50:51 GMT, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com

this ng, and pretty unequivocally, I might add.

If he's always "singing as himself" then he's a murderer when the narrator
is a murderer. If he isn't always "singing as himself" then he can sing as
The Wichita Lineman. Which is it?


Anonymous Wrote:

On Apr 14, 2:50 am, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com
Except that he doesn't sing as a murderer or lineman. He sings as one
who's...sick of love. You know: lovesick.

On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:20:37 GMT, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com

who's...sick of love. You know: lovesick.

I guess you missed the songs where he's killed someone. But of course that
isn't Dylan singing as himself but Phil Spector.


Anonymous Wrote:

On Apr 14, 2:20 pm, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com
Back in paradise?


Anonymous Wrote:

On Apr 14, 2:20 pm, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com
I beg your pardon. You're referring to a man named Grey, I believe.
Am I right? Well, first off, Grey was only shot, and second of all,
THEY say he shot him.


On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:18:11 -0500, "frinjdwelr" <...@charter.net

"Mr. Rick" <...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
***************************************************************

I agree. Saying he unequivocally cleared up the debate is way too
simplistic.
He expressed just as much duplicity as ever.


Anonymous Wrote:

On Apr 14, 8:18 pm, "frinjdwelr" <...@charter.net
Absolutely not. He was a clear as the day is wide about this. Not
only that, but he went on about it at some length. He clearly wanted
to make pure sure that he came across about this without
equivocation. I can't think of a single interview where he has been
THIS emphatic about a specific aspect of his Song. And I called
attention to it not because it was some big moment in pop icon
interview history, but precisely because this exact subject had been
the topic of heated discussion on this very ng and I thought, wow--how
interesting and on the nose. To say that there is duplicity about
this topic in the interview is not to have read what he said.

On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:52:16 -0700 (PDT), Jumbo <...@cupolagallery.com

Which might be taken to indicate that he was protesting too much.

Well, to assess someone's level of emphaticness is subjective. He did
it a lot in the Biograph booklet. And he goes on at far greater length
about specific aspects of his songs in various places in Chronicles.
Also in that book, he said that the BotTracks songs were based on
Chekhov's short stories. Must be true, cos he said so.

"On the nose" in that it happens to fit with your own take. That's
what I meant by subjective. We all do the same thing, I think. Quote
the bits from interviews we agree with as "sincere" and disregard the
parts we don't as just Bob joking.

Duplicity is not necessarily the issue. It's more like he's being
willfully selective with his memory. Any number of his songs clearly
do have narrators, so no matter what he says now, after the fact, to
suit some current mindset, that can't change. That holds true for all
writers in interviews. As you'll know, they're often the least
reliable sources of information regarding their own work.

Anonymous Wrote:

On Apr 15, 4:52 am, Jumbo <...@cupolagallery.com
I wasn't left with that impression. He wasn't being challenged.

I did read the memoir and I've seen those Biograph notes. I remember
discourses about Pirate Jenny's song, unfinished songs, a general Red
Grooms approach to songwriting, but nothing this focused about
INTENTION. I also don't believe he said that that particular album
was based on Chekhov, just AN album.

On the nose means exactly the same topic as appeared before in this
ng. Not a matter of opinion.

Someone else used that term. Of course it's not.

....

You'll have to tell me which ones. Where there is a narrator, my
memory is that he tells you up front that he will be narrating as
somebody else. Otherwise, I don't know which songs you refer to.

...

I don't know this to be a rule. The comments from this interview
would tend to undercut your assertion.

Anonymous Wrote:

I didn't say that clearly. "On the nose" means "precisely; exactly;
as it should be; on target." Thus he was discussing the exact same
thing that had been discussed in this ng--is he singing as himself or
as somebody else.


On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:30:05 GMT, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com

The "put-on" emotion comes from a mismatch in styles between the singer and
song. When Dylan sings House of the Rising Sun he isn't literally singing
the song as himself (girl prostitute's point of view), but he can feel and
express the emotion in a natural way.
Whereas for Glen Campbell, Wichita Lineman is a good match. Neither Dylan
or Campbell had to shinny up poles.


Anonymous Wrote:

On Apr 15, 9:30 am, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com
Rising Sun isn't his song. But even in that song, the writer clearly
indicates that the narrator is a poor girl.

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:29:48 GMT, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com

Neither is Wichita Lineman Glen Campbell's song, and that was Dylan's
example to show how a singer can stray from the truth by acting out a song
instead of simply being himself. If Glen Campbell can lose himself as the
lineman, Dylan can lose himself as the girl prostitute.

poor girl.

It's a folk song with no single author, and lyrics can always be changed to
suit a style (as Eric Burdon did with a lot of success). Dylan sings House
of the Rising Sun from a girl prostitute's point of view. He sings Delia
from a murderer's point of view. In Spirit On the Water he's a killer. In
Ain't Talkin' he's going to slaughter his enemies. In Moonlight he's ready
to strike his lover dead, if he hasn't already done so. Now either Dylan is
simply being himself in all these instances, or there's more to singing (and
songwriting) than he's made out in this interview.


Anonymous Wrote:

On Apr 15, 10:29 pm, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com
Exactly.

Wrong. He was discussing the songs he writes, where he doesn't take
on other guises.

Delia is the only song in this list where he sings someone else's
story. He makes it clear. It's Curtis. Again, it isn't his song.
He's not a killer in Spirit, or striking his lover dead in Moonlight.
In Ain't Talkin' he might sound like Aeneas and maybe he even borrows
some of those tropes. All the threats in this song are either his
bravado or the visions that come after being popped on the head in the
beginning. You could maybe make a case for Leopard Skin PBH, but
that's one out of hundreds of song...hardly a rule.

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:45:22 GMT, "Mr. Rick" <...@gmail.com

Phil Spector wrote those songs? It's necessary to dismiss the first-person
killing and violence because the (purported) lack of separation between the
real-life Dylan and the "I" of each song requires a moral accord. That is,
Dylan can't kill someone in song without being a killer in real life. If he
could, then Campbell or Jimmy Webb could be a lineman in a song without
having to worry about "losing themselves" and scampering up poles.


Discussion Title: Bob Dylan interview Part 4
Title Keywords: Dylan  interview  Part