<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
  <channel>
	  <title>Omgili - Search results - fsb</title>
	  <link>http://omgili.com/fsb</link>
	  <description><![CDATA[ Search results for - fsb ]]></description>
	  <copyright>Compilation: Copyright 2006, Omgili.com; Discussions content: Copyright of the boards from which data is spidered</copyright>
	  <language>en-us</language>
	  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:35:10 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	  
      
		  <item>
		  <title><![CDATA[P5Q Pro fsb hole? Secret to higher FSB? ]]></title>
          
              <link>http://omgili.com/jmp/jHIAmI4hxg_X0aQDAMVQftlJ07Hro6mVN_EoYrD40VQGWnik2yVHF2tYanUSxqLdStpzGP.3SXaSRiaIQUjvn8242q4SBBPBXaL76Rtk8_8ccU3.wAHCNAA9Z.M12kVi4Hp0yztqsgT5mofrGe.0YSxMISEZF5oPUmnnxR5NRV7WIAx2mTbKSA--</link>
          
          

           <description><![CDATA[
			
			 FSB  to not even thinking about booting a little bit just over 340fsb regardless of multi.
Is anyone
			
			aware of any  fsb  holes in the p5q pro?
If not, any advice on squeezing a higher  fsb  out of an e5200
			
			check when i get home tonight, i may simply be at the end of the  FSB  range for my cpu, i'm already
			 ]]>
		  </description>
          
              <guid isPermaLink="true">http://omgili.com/jmp/jHIAmI4hxg_X0aQDAMVQftlJ07Hro6mVN_EoYrD40VQGWnik2yVHF2tYanUSxqLdStpzGP.3SXaSRiaIQUjvn8242q4SBBPBXaL76Rtk8_8ccU3.wAHCNAA9Z.M12kVi4Hp0yztqsgT5mofrGe.0YSxMISEZF5oPUmnnxR5NRV7WIAx2mTbKSA--</guid>
          
          <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
          </item>
		  
		  <item>
		  <title><![CDATA[What's the difference between motherboard FSB & CPU FSB? ]]></title>
          
              <link>http://omgili.com/jmp/jHIAmI4hxg8IGE11yRZp0cmHCUvsDRKCJ9tOCsI9eHyu2CkBciizWooRcBhotIQ.F.OLstI2bAzJs_ax7OM3u3.mwIFmx6Dl0RMl_A.V_F0_Hu6cZq6oTVxR6.F8Le9aa5.ophxMuI1By4Le75K0XCQHm3tmJuD5k6PZK3omEQY.0ai_ypOR_whE3KcdpWq0</link>
          
          

           <description><![CDATA[
			
			AMD CPUs Semperton140 & Pheom II x2 have 4000 Hyper Transportation ( FSB ). NewEgg lists its
			
			motherboards with  FSB . Do the CPU's and motherboard's  FSB  need to match exactly? What if I ever get
			
			on the fancier boards. The board  fsb  doesn't need to match the cpu or memory fsb.Hypertransport
			 ]]>
		  </description>
          
              <guid isPermaLink="true">http://omgili.com/jmp/jHIAmI4hxg8IGE11yRZp0cmHCUvsDRKCJ9tOCsI9eHyu2CkBciizWooRcBhotIQ.F.OLstI2bAzJs_ax7OM3u3.mwIFmx6Dl0RMl_A.V_F0_Hu6cZq6oTVxR6.F8Le9aa5.ophxMuI1By4Le75K0XCQHm3tmJuD5k6PZK3omEQY.0ai_ypOR_whE3KcdpWq0</guid>
          
          <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
          </item>
		  
		  <item>
		  <title><![CDATA[Do you prefer FSB or QPI ??? ]]></title>
          
              <link>http://omgili.com/jmp/jHIAmI4hxg_X0aQDAMVQftlJ07Hro6mVN_EoYrD40VQGWnik2yVHF3Zv3Cy93_qTcr50ZNSpwu1UCGF8jn32IHgGgaOpYyhewI0ftRX1OUwZe21rD5V9rQ75tOSkm7NEpYhhJQYdK57x033ZOrW0uFVawMFbuhRE</link>
          
          

           <description><![CDATA[
			
			The  FSB  determined the speeds of our CPU's - if you had an  FSB  of more than 500Mhz - people instantly
			
			multiplier, times 21 by 185 etc..." it takes ages!! not just like  FSB  - 400*9 = 3.6Ghz - easy!!!  FSB 
			
			QPI.QPI +1If you post QPI or  FSB , the thread would be alot more informative if you mentioned why
			 ]]>
		  </description>
          
              <guid isPermaLink="true">http://omgili.com/jmp/jHIAmI4hxg_X0aQDAMVQftlJ07Hro6mVN_EoYrD40VQGWnik2yVHF3Zv3Cy93_qTcr50ZNSpwu1UCGF8jn32IHgGgaOpYyhewI0ftRX1OUwZe21rD5V9rQ75tOSkm7NEpYhhJQYdK57x033ZOrW0uFVawMFbuhRE</guid>
          
          <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
          </item>
		  
		  <item>
		  <title><![CDATA[440LX FSB capabilities ]]></title>
          
              <link>http://omgili.com/jmp/jHIAmI4hxg_X0aQDAMVQftlJ07Hro6mVN_EoYrD40VQGWnik2yVHF.PhqPSSp1zIyUV9ZmlRCddMkCNBWbG6HoqhWji6pFTctx7ZRrBiuUnQaCoDP.yh7QYAP9vij_o2tTXicrhiNF8bt1xh66gRGQgbFY998PbC</link>
          
          

           <description><![CDATA[
			
			OK, for all you old schoolers out there....
Barring other issues, what kind of  FSB  can a 440LX
			
			around with has jumpers to set  FSB  up to 100 MHz.
And on that note, would a PII 300 be able to make
			
			to be serving files and folding and the more  FSB  I can get out of it the better.
Plus it's a dual... (Asus
			 ]]>
		  </description>
          
              <guid isPermaLink="true">http://omgili.com/jmp/jHIAmI4hxg_X0aQDAMVQftlJ07Hro6mVN_EoYrD40VQGWnik2yVHF.PhqPSSp1zIyUV9ZmlRCddMkCNBWbG6HoqhWji6pFTctx7ZRrBiuUnQaCoDP.yh7QYAP9vij_o2tTXicrhiNF8bt1xh66gRGQgbFY998PbC</guid>
          
          <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
          </item>
		  
		  <item>
		  <title><![CDATA[KT333 support 333MHz FSB? ]]></title>
          
              <link>http://omgili.com/jmp/jHIAmI4hxg_X0aQDAMVQftlJ07Hro6mVN_EoYrD40VQGWnik2yVHF2bEw2V7wnSLtQ3RlzOF85cRuFN0SYEqX4uJTzuHqFrPFkl9bfyUu1DN54Uu_pZN_EjR55FD.DJKDm4oWTGpi8HuSIKBWjAVuMkryuri.Vxd</link>
          
          

           <description><![CDATA[
			
			Ultra Platinum and I'm hoping to drop a Barton in it, but the faster bartons run 333MHz  fsb .
			
			KT333 chipset MBs are rated at 166mhz  FSB  or 333mhz  FSB .
You might need a BIOS update to support
			
			and soyo says my model only supports up to 2600+ 233MHz tbreds- no support for any bartons at any  fsb 
			 ]]>
		  </description>
          
              <guid isPermaLink="true">http://omgili.com/jmp/jHIAmI4hxg_X0aQDAMVQftlJ07Hro6mVN_EoYrD40VQGWnik2yVHF2bEw2V7wnSLtQ3RlzOF85cRuFN0SYEqX4uJTzuHqFrPFkl9bfyUu1DN54Uu_pZN_EjR55FD.DJKDm4oWTGpi8HuSIKBWjAVuMkryuri.Vxd</guid>
          
          <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
          </item>
		  
		  <item>
		  <title><![CDATA[[XtremeSystems]750 FSB, World Record FSB ]]></title>
          
              <link>http://omgili.com/jmp/jHIAmI4hxg9aJiJMzv3pxIeiyBPZhpI58fVcgFNd5owyt5oTH2HqzdUtCpByZcwfUnuuoKnuCDRLdTBjTJtkis2SHUN0jL6YQ_TmBLKR3We675HqHpxkVFXHrpQkItNFKBdnK5PDT1HHDjmamqs5XczAr5C7bzQQ3bvU6RWaqC4EJ.IccpyWXoORymvDrxDb4EU5P.5u_xV5tFcP8n7zLKlqW0dH4fAMk.GeLWBImB8-</link>
          
          

           <description><![CDATA[
			
			With a multi of 6x750  FSB  = 4.5Ghz on a Gigabyte EP45T-Extreme. NB and CPU on LN2.
http://www.xtremesystems.org
			
			Damn.whoa nice job bennywow3.3.3.3.3000  fsb ! Holy crapHoly hell. And to think I was a doubter
			
			of 2oz PCB...now that is a crazy  FSB 
Not really crazy clocks though, maybe he should be trying for 7ghz
			 ]]>
		  </description>
          
              <guid isPermaLink="true">http://omgili.com/jmp/jHIAmI4hxg9aJiJMzv3pxIeiyBPZhpI58fVcgFNd5owyt5oTH2HqzdUtCpByZcwfUnuuoKnuCDRLdTBjTJtkis2SHUN0jL6YQ_TmBLKR3We675HqHpxkVFXHrpQkItNFKBdnK5PDT1HHDjmamqs5XczAr5C7bzQQ3bvU6RWaqC4EJ.IccpyWXoORymvDrxDb4EU5P.5u_xV5tFcP8n7zLKlqW0dH4fAMk.GeLWBImB8-</guid>
          
          <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
          </item>
		  
		  <item>
		  <title><![CDATA[AMDs Top FSB and newer/faster FSB mobos ]]></title>
          
              <link>http://omgili.com/jmp/.0rSU5LtMgyABGacaYBUkRO_6lZMuoscQ1vm3Q.gedSj4UiwkvHk3UjIoMqIsQWCb3MPNwlMp_5FYmDU__ziXMSKHZt_7ZX.IhGDmKyzxE88aDhfqP.wo3zyciT3zWfN4LXqiZ8.N2Io01yRypf91Vp9_DdjYGU.xKoChzo1fNdPqu8yEHsM_g--</link>
          
          

           <description><![CDATA[
			
			Well, I'm curious! I read that AMD CPUs are capped at a certain  FSB . 266? So, would going
			
			to a motherboard that allows for a faster  FSB  really allow the CPU to take advantage of it? Something
			
			P.S.
Not even KT266 but more like KT133! KT133 IS already running at the 266  FSB ! What's up
			 ]]>
		  </description>
          
              <guid isPermaLink="true">http://omgili.com/jmp/.0rSU5LtMgyABGacaYBUkRO_6lZMuoscQ1vm3Q.gedSj4UiwkvHk3UjIoMqIsQWCb3MPNwlMp_5FYmDU__ziXMSKHZt_7ZX.IhGDmKyzxE88aDhfqP.wo3zyciT3zWfN4LXqiZ8.N2Io01yRypf91Vp9_DdjYGU.xKoChzo1fNdPqu8yEHsM_g--</guid>
          
          <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0300</pubDate>
          </item>
		  
		  <item>
		  <title><![CDATA[(FaD) FSB vs Multiplier ]]></title>
          
              <link>http://omgili.com/jmp/jHIAmI4hxg.vMYMiHaOYIM5F_36OwcTOaMRsKjr8SCNWUYGn4B16hYKELdofx4q.DmbaeqTodvtpWAcT9FkEfFopkKLihayYZqAvz4t6BoirMZlHmxcGpxrzqhk4Wo73EmPRPFX2aOLcuGWwSqE.2JRx7L7y.34YgI.NyFbEHNvmmSumKDwjFQyDZ1wfmDpY</link>
          
          

           <description><![CDATA[
			
			Which one will improve the speed of processing mollies,using a lower multiplier, and higher  FSB 
			
			, or lower  FSB  with higher multiplier?
			
			as good as 200x11.5 But you'll notice the difference if you use the PC for anything else,  FSB 
			 ]]>
		  </description>
          
              <guid isPermaLink="true">http://omgili.com/jmp/jHIAmI4hxg.vMYMiHaOYIM5F_36OwcTOaMRsKjr8SCNWUYGn4B16hYKELdofx4q.DmbaeqTodvtpWAcT9FkEfFopkKLihayYZqAvz4t6BoirMZlHmxcGpxrzqhk4Wo73EmPRPFX2aOLcuGWwSqE.2JRx7L7y.34YgI.NyFbEHNvmmSumKDwjFQyDZ1wfmDpY</guid>
          
          <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
          </item>
		  
		  <item>
		  <title><![CDATA[FSB in Intel Nehalem i7 ]]></title>
          
              <link>http://omgili.com/jmp/.0rSU5LtMgxDxQfYir.fD1ANsifJkwPo7ldMkKWgxBdu1b8Mgo.yNRVMAyYg56eUs0T0iPU8ZvoJFcPUD6nDZcDLNz.EfTgECWdIG1ywUXJHgmpQLjfLkY3RAMXDfdkNDdwFNUiczAybUfS.Lv8D1I4Pn4VDLx8S</link>
          
          

           <description><![CDATA[
			
			What happened to  FSB  in terms of the new Intel i7s? Simply put, where the hell did it go?
I don't
			
			see a  FSB  rating in any i7 specifications.
			
			Bclk.The  FSB  has been replaced by the Bclk in the sense that that is now multiplied to determine
			 ]]>
		  </description>
          
              <guid isPermaLink="true">http://omgili.com/jmp/.0rSU5LtMgxDxQfYir.fD1ANsifJkwPo7ldMkKWgxBdu1b8Mgo.yNRVMAyYg56eUs0T0iPU8ZvoJFcPUD6nDZcDLNz.EfTgECWdIG1ywUXJHgmpQLjfLkY3RAMXDfdkNDdwFNUiczAybUfS.Lv8D1I4Pn4VDLx8S</guid>
          
          <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
          </item>
		  
		  <item>
		  <title><![CDATA[Increased FSB by 20 percent lost video feed... now what? ]]></title>
          
              <link>http://omgili.com/jmp/.0rSU5LtMgxDxQfYir.fD1ANsifJkwPo7ldMkKWgxBdu1b8Mgo.yNX9.pjgrh5Y7Xm8w6cp4nz_rS_dQVLLMMtLu9oUrDyYFvvairIyMu48yiJNkVKH_6IIcsoItGbWmbjBndMhYhhXVjBav43XXYq6_TO8lw2gfyYX5o5C3O0SVkFhX8UUjdubVbJsET97I582cK_GJaLA-</link>
          
          

           <description><![CDATA[
			
			Solving the problem
The only bios setting I changed is  FSB ... any ideas on what I should try???
Im
			
			Hi All,
After increasing the front side bus on an AMD Anthlon64 3500+
I suddenly dont have video feed.. Everything else seems...
			
			seems to be fine!
I really have no idea where to start here for troubleshooting/solving the problem
The only bios setting...
			 ]]>
		  </description>
          
              <guid isPermaLink="true">http://omgili.com/jmp/.0rSU5LtMgxDxQfYir.fD1ANsifJkwPo7ldMkKWgxBdu1b8Mgo.yNX9.pjgrh5Y7Xm8w6cp4nz_rS_dQVLLMMtLu9oUrDyYFvvairIyMu48yiJNkVKH_6IIcsoItGbWmbjBndMhYhhXVjBav43XXYq6_TO8lw2gfyYX5o5C3O0SVkFhX8UUjdubVbJsET97I582cK_GJaLA-</guid>
          
          <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
          </item>
		  
  </channel>

</rss>
