|
A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis
Graeme MacQueen
Tony Szamboti
Introduction
In its Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers, the National Institute of Standards and Technology summarizes its three year study...
Started by wake_up_bomb on
, 17 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at davidicke):
January 2009 / Volume 24
The Missing Jolt:
A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis a refutation that is:
easy to understand but reasonably precise
capable of being stated briefly
verifiable refutation it does....
|
|
Hey guys,
This is probably the most awkward thing I have ever done. Usually when people say "Skeptic Magazine" I scoff, but lately as I grow more out of pseudoscience and more into actual science I am starting to appreciate this stuff. ANYWAY, down to...
Started by hinduw on
, 40 posts
by 10 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at skepticforum):
I confirm it and say, "evolution is right", because I have heard no refutation of this claim the evidence before I confirm it and say, "evolution is right", because I have heard no refutation.
|
|
The link provided is held on Youtube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybPaGerF0TU&feature=player_embedded
This video was hosted by X conference 2009 and has been put up online by UFO TV and is being pushed out by UFO believers as if a credible irrefutable...
Started by Skeptic Witness on
, 32 posts
by 14 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at skepticforum):
What more of a refutation could you want? "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep of a refutation could you want?....
He simply made active.
I see no need for "scientific refutation" since he supplied no scientific evidence.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
For those of you who believe the Nutty 911 Physicsmongers which seems to be the case with some of the recent OPs.
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/911nutphysics.htm
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/911NutPhysics0.HTM
Started by wispy on
, 20 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at davidicke):
If that is the case, it could quite easily be you are being mislead .
Dont you have an opinion of your own? Cant you work this stuff out for yourself? i see you get other people to do your thinking for you and just link to their work .
|
|
The rebuttal period is a time for refutation and summary; in fact, such emphasis has been placed on summary that some writers now refer to the "rebuttal-summary" period. Sometime one team believes that it has completely refuted the other team's arguments...
Started by sumon on
, 1 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at daffodilvarsity):
|
|
By kadafi ( www.islamicboard.com )
All praise is due to Allah, and Allah's Peace and Blessings be
upon His Final Messenger, his pure family, his noble
Companions, and all those who follow them with righteousness
until the Day of Judgment.
I would like...
Started by kadafi Guest on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at islamicboard):
Bumpity bump.
Salaam Alaikum.
You did a nice job.
|
|
I ran across the following video on Youtube that stylishly debunks some of the more glaring junk science assertions in the, "Bleep," movie. This would be good to show somebody on the edge of the RSE rabbit hole, but not yet fallen in. I don't think this...
Started by freemysoul on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at enlightenmefree):
Enjoy the....
How could anyone possibly believe that.
Ure=relmfu
The natives couldn't see the ships because they have never had the experience .
Http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4jn9A6M ...
Brief and funny take on What the Bleep.
That is brief and good.
|
|
Quote: : This is the English version of mine Urdu Thread on the same topic with little bit modification Assalam-o-Alaikum!
If you search on internet on topic najd or east of madina or horn of Satan you might come up with Google Earth Screen Shots and ...
Started by طالب علم on
, 1 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at urduvb):
|
|
On May 23, 7:16*am, Pentcho Quote: :
The observer starts moving towards the light source with speed v so the frequency he measures shifts from f to f' and the speed of light he measures shifts from c to c'. f'=? c'=?
http://www.hep.man.ac.uk/u/roger/PHY...
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at spacebanter):
F'=? c'=?
http:....
|
|
The observer starts moving towards the light source with speed v so the frequency he measures shifts from f to f' and the speed of light he measures shifts from c to c'. f'=? c'=?
http://www.hep.man.ac.uk/u/roger/PHY.../lecture18.pdf
Roger Barlow, Professor...
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at spacebanter):
Does this imply that, in a gravitation-free space, the speed of light (as measured by the observer) varies with the speed of the observer as predicted by Newton's emission... .
Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as cannonballs .
|