Omgili - forum search, search forums  
  

Discussions about ruby

Displaying 1 - 10 out of 58,552 discussions.  
RSS Feed Options
Time Frame: (Any time)   Minimum number of replies: (2)   Minimum number of discussing users: (0)
  |  

Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  
Keep this page open to be updated with the newest discussions automatically.
I am writing a web based debugger for Ruby, but in order to do this I need to be able to call the Ruby debugger from within a Ruby program on the server side. Has this ever been done? Is this even possible? The end product being built will allow Ruby ...
Started by on , 3 posts by 3 people.  
I would suggest you do all....
Then you run : ruby client_script.rb and this will stop the process once it reaches the debugger line.
I would imagine this as opening the same script a debugger call .
I think you could make use of ruby-debug .
Is there any way, on Ubuntu 9.04, to install ruby 1.8 as ruby1.8 (or get rid of it altogether) and have ruby 1.9 be the default ruby ?
Started by on , 3 posts by 3 people.  
I'm not really sure, but maybe this can help update-alternatives --config ruby try sudo apt-get a restart 1.9 was the standard ruby.
I've bought "Programming Ruby" from Pragmatic Programmers (still in beta), but friends say that "The Ruby Way" is much better. Should I buy it or wait for Ruby 1.9 books?
Started by on , 7 posts by 7 people.  
Ruby is awesome....
Ruby 1.9 isn't that much different, I'd recommend The Ruby Way as well safest to get the Ruby 1.8 book, learn the stable version of the environment, and if you find release.
Of the incompatible changes in 1.9.
Ask your Facebook Friends
I have been studying ruby for the past few days and I have noticed there is Ruby on Rails. What is the difference between the two? Do they work to together? Is the syntax the same?
Started by on , 5 posts by 5 people.  
Its popularity prompted many people to take up writing....
Ruby on Rails is a library written in the Ruby language.
Ruby on Rails is a Ruby framework for implementing web applications.
Ruby is a general purpose language.
Hay Guys, whats the best books to learn ruby (and ruby on rails)? Any books you guys would recommend? Thanks
Started by on , 9 posts by 9 people.  
I prefer the advanced one but if you....
The Rails Way : is my reference for every day programming Rails Recipe : Nice examples .
Ruby why's (poignant) guide to Ruby best book i've ever read on a programming language with ruby on rails.
I'm interested in learning ruby. But the most important thing for me is, if there are any good editors for that. That will help me decide if it's worth to switch from PHP to Ruby.
Started by on , 7 posts by 7 people.  
I prefer to use....
See this question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/59968/best-editor-for-ruby .
Many it to switch from PHP to Ruby.
Vim,emacs,textmate I, and many other people, use and prefer TextMate for Ruby on Rails work.
About half a year ago, when I started to learn Ruby and Rails, I first tried Ruby 1.9 but I soon gave up, because at that time nothing worked out of the box and almost every helping blog or tutorial was designed for Ruby 1.8. What about now? (Dec 2009...
Started by on , 3 posts by 3 people.  
You can read more here: Has anyone successfully deployed a Rails project... .
Unfortunately I dind't have good experiences with Ruby 1.9 and Rails.
Compatible with ruby 1.9, however sepcial cases might exist but I'm not aware of any right now.
I found this error in Ruby console while I am testing a Rails application. /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/lib /mongrel.rb:285: in `run': Ruby threads cannot be used in RubyCocoa without ...
Started by on , 4 posts by 4 people.  
Library/Frameworks/RubyCocoa.framework/Versions/A/Resources/ruby/osx/ objc/ruby_addition.rb_allowed then warn "#{caller[0]}: Ruby threads cannot be used in RubyCocoa without patches to the Ruby;> Thread.new { puts 'hi' ....
I'm on OS X (with bash) and a newbie at unix. I want to know if it's possible to amend some file such that to run a ruby program, I don't need "ruby file.rb", but instead can just run "ruby.rb". Is there a reason NOT to do this? Thanks!
Started by on , 6 posts by 6 people.  
EDIT....
Assuming ruby.rb has something like this in it: #!/usr/bin/env ruby puts 'Hello world' At the command For more details see wikibooks .
Yes you can do this.
The shell doesn't care.
(#!/usr/local/ruby or whatever the path is on OSX).
I'm expanding my Ruby understanding by coding an equivalent of Kent Beck's xUnit in Ruby. Python (which Kent writes in) has an assert() method in the language which is used extensively. Ruby does not. I think it should be easy to add this but is Kernel...
Started by on , 5 posts by 5 people.  
How Ruby's built-in unit tests.
So while Test::Unit might be useful for unit-tests, rather to catch cases where "this should never happen" .
Testing suite as a way of becoming more familiar with Ruby.
Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  
Related Searches
RUBI FROM PATHANKOT    ruby    tm13 ruby    rmxp ruby    Mox Ruby    ruby abstract class    PAR_V3 mew pokemon ruby    pokemon ruby PAR_v3 list    ruby treetop forum    ruby nmap Parser   
More Information


Forum Search About Omgili Help Plugins Forum/Board Owners Privacy

i
In Title
In Topic
In Reply
Exclude
Boost