|
I have in inbound rule to allow all communication with MyApp.exe I have an outbound rule to block all traffic to 192.168.0.88 Can MyApp.exe communicate with 192.168.0.88 - I don't understand which rule takes precedence.
Started by RichAmberale on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at serverfault):
I'm confused about your "Inbound Rule" though, because rules have an order of processing....
If you have a rule permitting inbound access as the client is concerned never be seen again.
Inbound and outbound rules are mutually exclusive.
|
|
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:11:57 +0200, qmars765@gmx.de wrote:
Dear List,
In JBoss Rules documentation it is written that they can be used for production rules. But I frequently read also in other sources about ECA rules.
Is there any significant difference...
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Mark
qmars765@gmx.de wrote:
> Dear....
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:20:51 +0100, Mark Proctor <mproctor@codehaus.org> wrote:
ECA is really a specialised subset of Product Rules; focusing more on
generic event generation and event handling.
|
|
I'm trying to locate an open source business rules engine that has a decent interface for building the rules.
OR at least one that works well on the .Net platform and has been updated sometime in the past 12 months.
Thanks,
Started by Chris Lively on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
The Rule Manager from Acumen Business has.
For Validation and Business Rules
You can use Reaction RuleML.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
I'm about to work on a retail product website that has been around for about 10 years. The website ranks nicely in Google search results. The website has evolved a lot over the years so it's no surprise their .htaccess file is full of 301 redirects and...
Started by John on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
If another site has a link that goes here:
http://www.example.com/oldpage.html
And you have this 301ed to:
http://www.example.com/newpage.html
What would happen if you removed that 301 (and oldpage.html doesn'... .
Think about this.
You're stuck with them.
|
|
I want to parse orders-series below:
orders-series: {Wordpress Profiles Blogger is a User Admin is a Blogger Author is a Blogger Subscriber is a User Blogger Role Blogger Manage Posts Admin Roles Admin Manage Site Manage Site Include Manage Users Manage...
Started by Rebol Tutorial on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
] ] ] rule: [ (orders-block: copy []) [ any [copy order an-order (append orders-block order) [ any newline | end]] ] ] parse orders-series rule
I suspect that both Doc's and Henrik's solution would.
|
|
In ASP.NET MVC controllers exist in a folder called Controllers. Their names must end Controller otherwise things just don't work (you get an HTTP 404 error).
However, Model names don't have to end Model and View names don't have to end with View .
This...
Started by Richard Ev on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Better to specify that the directory should be called "Controllers" and what's inside are all controllers and nothing else .
Adds unnecessary text.
I really dislike that controller classes should end with "-Controller" .
I was wondering the same thing.
|
|
Re: Blog Rules Curious: What are the in-Blog rules regarding advertising?
Started by Master Mew on
, 15 posts
by 12 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at bulbagarden):
What I'm asking is does the same rule apply to blogs, or are we allowed to discuss.
What I'm asking is does the same rule apply in signatures.
Websites is that it is never allowed, except in signatures .
|
|
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:23:39 -0400, "Karl Trout" <karl.trout@gmail.com> wrote:
Anyone have a good idea on how one would go about inserting a definition of
the rule inside the rule so when the rule is analyzed the definition could
be attained?...
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Of the rule inside the rule so when the rule is analyzed
> the definition could be attained?
>
inserting a
definition of the rule inside the rule so when the rule is analyzed the
definition could;karl.trout....
|
|
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:21:58 +0530, "Sikkandar Nawabjan" <Sikkandar.Nawabjan@ust-global.com> wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 Objects and its corresponding drl/dsls to validate the rule
ObjectA - A.drl,A.dsl
ObjectB - B.drl,B.dsl
when i insert ObjectA...
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
Corresponding drl/dsls to validate the rule
>
> ObjectA - A.drl,A.dsl
>
> ObjectB - B.drl i insert ObjectB along with ObjectA i want to fire rules only from B.drl
>
> There are some rule the rule from A.....
|
|
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:28:07 -0800 (PST), ekke <ekkehard@gentz-software.de> wrote:
hi barath,
both rules are valid, so both rules will be fired.
the Rules engine decides which to run first.
you have to use salience if you prefer one rule running...
Started by ekke on
, 2 posts
by 2 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at omgili):
In calculate rule , How it applies fibonacci object ie
fibonacci(1,1)-->.
And
cancelled?
3.
|