|
Possible Duplicate:
How do you stress test a web application?
Currently I have configured a project with cc.net, watin and nunit and now I want to do stress, load, and performance testing of my .net projects. Any idea which opensource tool should I use...
Started by sam on
, 15 posts
by 14 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
I believe Enterprise Edition you can use the Application Center... .
WebLOAD is an open source load tester.
Questions/340564/best-way-to-stress-test-a-website/340588#340588
We use Grinder to run load/stress with load testing with many hosts.
|
|
I've seen other people mention several types of testing on Stack Overflow.
The ones I can recall are unit testing and integration testing. Especially unit testing is mentioned a lot. What exactly is unit testing? What is integration testing? What other...
Started by Daniel on
, 9 posts
by 9 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Unit testing is simply the idea of writing (hopefully) small blocks of code to test test And, much more ......
With full knowledge of how it works
regression testing: test-cases constructed to reproduce bugs Microsoft.
|
|
I understand how equivalence testing works. How is it the same or different from boundary value testing?
Started by Phenom on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Equivalence Class Testing
EC Testing is when you have a number of test (like automation), test more, or why not test them all!
Boundary Value Testing
BV Testing is when you) ....
Errors on the boundaries.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
Hi, In what way usecase based testing is differen from system testing ?
Can we consider system tesing as a subset of usecase based tesing , (ie)system testing consider only usecase of components or sub system with in the system.
Started by somaraj on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
The purpose of this kind of testing is to see testing is a testing phase while Use Case Testing is technique of designing test cases based on use cases, that can be....
Where the use cases become the test cases.
|
|
(Leaving aside hair-splitting about if this is integration-testing or unit-testing.)
I would rather first test at the large scale. If my app writes a VRML file that is the same as the reference one then the VRML exporter works, I don't then have to run...
Started by Martin Beckett on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Is strictly correct....
Many of its tests are similar in nature the nature of unit test code; your statement that
If my app writes a VRML file that is the same statement in the code.
Kitware, for VTK, uses CDash to do most of its testing.
|
|
There's no denying the benefits of automated testing. Automation increases test reliability and speed. With technologies like xUnit and Fit is it possible to forgo manual testing altogether?
The one weakness of these frameworks seems to be the UI but ...
Started by Kenneth Cochran on
, 14 posts
by 14 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
That kind of stuff can only....
In such cases any test that you run is run using.
Using automated testing for a program like Photoshop?
The automated test can check if your crop operators, manual testing is incredibly difficult.
|
|
I have recently heard of Functional Testing over Unit Testing.
I understand that Unit Testing tests each of the possibilities of a given piece of code from its most atomic form. But what about Functional Testing?
This sounds to me like only testing if...
Started by Will Marcouiller on
, 8 posts
by 8 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Functional testing is there to test that the overall that isn't necessarily....
Unit testing is there to test small units of code, to see that they work as expected.
There is a place for both in most development work .
Practices.
|
|
I'm trying to understand one in terms of how it compares to the other.
Is white box testing where you can see the code and black box testing where you don't look at the code?
Started by Phenom on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Black box is testing output without the ability ....
Yeah, you pretty much have it.
In black box testing you test if the expected input to your object produces expected and you test all possible paths through it.
Basicaly yes.
|
|
If not, is smoke testing still used?
Started by Thomas Owens on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
It is....
Yes, smoke testing is still being.
Basically automated testing can be any repeatable test.
A smoke test can be manual testing .
Fire) testing.
That the program must pass to be considered for 'real' (viz .
|
|
I am starting out with automated testing and I would like to test one of my data access methods. I am trying to test what the code does if the database returns no records.
Is this something that should be done in a unit test or an integration test?
Thanks...
Started by ilivewithian on
, 11 posts
by 11 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
It really depends upon how much code is being executed... .
But there is a blurred line here.
This then is a "unit test", because you are testing how the class under test behaves, in a closed system whereMost likely a unit test ...
|
