Omgili - forum search, search forums  
  

Discussions about thorough

Displaying 1 - 10 out of 119,433 discussions.  
Time Frame: (Any time)   Minimum number of replies: (2)   Minimum number of discussing users: (0)
  |  

Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  
Keep this page open to be updated with the newest discussions automatically.
Hey guys. I would like to learn about MS Sharepoint 2007...does anyone know where I can begin (the more thorough, the better) Thanks...much appreciated!
Started by on , 5 posts by 5 people.  
If you want to learn to develop on WSS, please ... .
Inside Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 - easily the best book out there on SharePoint, covers everything in MOSS despite the title .
Microsoft's Sharepoint site and technet are good resources.
Should the programmer be aware of operator precedence thoroughly? Using braces to group expressions should be okay, isn't? I always uses braces to be on safer side. And when asked a question on precedence, I cannot answer readily.
Started by on , 17 posts by 17 people.  
I know the basics (e.g., division and multiplication ....
It will help readability and maintainability.
However, I think there's value in using parentheses to be perfectly clear about your intention .
Yes, it's important to understand operator precedence.
I am not a DBA by any means, but being a web developer means that I will have to install, setup, and administer databases. In the past, I have just followed the default installation for SQL Server. Over time, I have grown smarter and learned that default...
Started by on , 8 posts by 8 people.  
The Microsoft documentation in Books on Line and elsewhere is pretty thorough and accurate.
Or maintenance.
Ask your Facebook Friends
I work on an application that uses DCOM to communicate between what are essentially several peers; in the course of normal use, instances on separate machines serve a variety of objects to one another. Historically, for this to work we have used some ...
Started by on , 4 posts by 4 people.  
I can.
Programming Windows Security by Keith Brown includes a thorough discussion of DCOM security.
Languages like C, Haskell, Lisp, Smalltalk, and assembly language are often touted as things every programmer should know for their effect on the way one thinks about programming, even if they're used very little in real world situations. However, to ...
Started by on , 9 posts by 9 people.  
Once you have done so, you probably know enough ... .
You should pick a mid-sized project and complete it.
You should learn them to the point where you are comfortable working in them, but not to the point where you understand all the idiosyncratic issues .
I'm working in a startup company where the development team is a small team of three programmers; A project manager, myself and another guy. The issue is that the other guy regularly commits code into SVN that doesn't actually work! The base usually compiles...
Started by on , 32 posts by 32 people.  
I am good at thinking about and writing code, but I'm not good at being careful that two things have happened: 1) my coders... .
Make him realise that he has to be more thorough as noone wants to have a senior looking over I am not thorough.
Hello all. I'm a "good" programmer. I know Haskell, OCaml, and other functional languages very well. I know also Smalltalk, Objective-C, and other OO languages. I spend my time on LtU, I know a fair amount about programming language theory and compiler...
Started by on , 9 posts by 9 people.  
Andrew Koenig's book is also....
(Neil Butterworth helpfully notes that this is called The C++ Programming Language and that you do not want the annotated reference manual which is now obsolete) .
With your experience, go straight to Stroustrup's reference.
Give me some of your thoughts on which is a better coding practice/makes more efficient code/looks prettier/whatever: Increasing and improving your ability to use if statements to anticipate and catch potential problems? Or simply making good use of try...
Started by on , 8 posts by 7 people.  
My 2p: Using try/catch is best: it makes it absolutely clear to other coders that you are doing exception handling the compiler understands what you are doing and can perform more appropriate compile-time checks for you In my experience, using if-conditional... .
I've got a disk with a known problem (I know because dd gags when I try to clone it). But when I boot with a live CD and run fsck on the unmounted partition, I get this: ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo fsck /dev/sdf1 fsck 1.41.4 (27-Jan-2009) e2fsck 1.41.4 (27-...
Started by on , 4 posts by 4 people.  
Shutdown -rF now This may not be relevant....
One easy way to do this without a live cdrom boot is to reboot with the -F option .
You want the -f option to fsck (Force checking even if the file system seems clean.) You should run fsck in single user mode .
Seriously, I've trawled MSDN and only got half answers - what do the columns on the Task Manager mean? Why can't I calculate the VM Usage by enumerating threads, modules, heaps &c.? How can I be sure I am accurately reporting to clients of my memory manager...
Started by on , 3 posts by 3 people.  
A new edition that....
Mark Russinovich has written the excellent book Windows Internals.
Here is a quick article on Windows Memory Management , which goes into sufficient depth to interpret what you're actually seeing in Task Manager or Process Explorer .
Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  

Related Message Boards & Forums

  • Stack Overflow
  • Super User
Related Searches
Thoroughly    avast "thorough scan"   
More Information


Forum Search About Omgili Help Plugins Forum/Board Owners Privacy

i
In Title
In Topic
In Reply
Exclude
Boost