Omgili - forum search, search forums  
  

Discussions about throw

Displaying 1 - 10 out of 731,717 discussions.  
RSS Feed Options
Time Frame: (Any time)   Minimum number of replies: (2)   Minimum number of discussing users: (0)
  |  

Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  
Keep this page open to be updated with the newest discussions automatically.
What is the difference between try { } catch { throw; } and try { } catch(Exception e) { throw e;} and when should i use one or another?
Started by on , 7 posts by 7 people.  
You should use try { } catch(Exception e) { throw } if you want to do something with the exception before ....
Catch (Exception ex) { throw new Exception("Additional information...", ex); } There's a blog post discussing the differences.
The title really is the question for this one: Is there an equivalent in T-SQL to C#'s "throw;" to re-throw exceptions? In C# one can do this: try { DoSomethingThatMightThrowAnException(); } catch (Exception ex) { // Do something with the exception throw...
Started by on , 5 posts by 5 people.  
); END CATCH; EDIT: This is not really the same thing as c#'s throw or throw ex.
State.
There are some posts that asks what the difference between those two are already. (why do I have to even mention this...) But my question is different in a way that I am calling "throw ex" in another error god-like handling method. public class Program...
Started by on , 6 posts by 6 people.  
No, this will cause the exception to have a different... .
Yes, there is a difference; throw ex resets the stack trace (so your errors would appear to originate from HandleException ) throw doesn't - the original offender would be preserved.
Ask your Facebook Friends
Imagine two similar pieces of code: try { [...] } catch (myErr &err) { err.append("More info added to error..."); throw err; } and try { [...] } catch (myErr &err) { err.append("More info added to error..."); throw; } Are these effectively the same or...
Started by on , 3 posts by 3 people.  
In the second case according to C++ Standard 15.1/6 copy constructor is not used: A throw exception will be thrown according to 15.1/3: A throw-expression initializes a temporary object from the static type of the operand of throw....
In Java, what is the difference between the twin methods? public void methodA() throws AnException { //do something throw new AnException(); } public void methodA() { //do the same thing throw new AnException(); } I have a intuition that it has something...
Started by on , 5 posts by 5 people.  
Aside from the good answers given by others about.
The javadoc for your method will show that it might throw advanced setup for functions that throw exceptions.
In this case, for the reasons of documentation.
I'd like to ask this question (also here ), but this time about C++. What is the difference in C++ between try { /*some code here*/} catch(MyException& ex) { throw ex;} and try { /*some code here*/} catch(MyException& ex) { throw;} Is it just in the stack...
Started by on , 9 posts by 9 people.  
You can use the throw; form with catch(...) (that is it is the only way to rethrow if you caught using catch(...) )....
throw ex will make another copy and is not recommend use throw only to throw the current exception object.
Here's the setup. I have a C++ program which calls several functions, all of which potentially throw the same exception set, and I want the same behaviour for the exceptions in each function (e.g. print error message & reset all the data to the default...
Started by on , 4 posts by 4 people.  
In this case, the standard (see section 15.5.1) specifies that If... .
If you use throw outside of an exception, you will throw without an exception being handled.
If you use throw inside of a catch block, it will rethrow the exception.
I was digging around in MSDN and found this article which had one interesting bit of advice: Do not have public members that can either throw or not throw exceptions based on some option. For example: Uri ParseUri(string uriValue, bool throwOnError) Now...
Started by on , 7 posts by 7 people.  
Developers tend to expect every method to throw an exception exception so that I can catch it later....
Namely because it requires of nasty from a readabilty standpoint .
Idea to have a throw / no throw decision be based off of a boolean.
Whenever I throw an exception in my service, another exception is thrown right after it: System.ServiceModel.CommunicationException: There was an error reading from the pipe: Unrecognized error 109 (0x6d). ---> System.IO.PipeException: There was an...
Started by on , 3 posts by 3 people.  
How to enable this: check this site: link text Problem was client calling Abort on the channel whenever I returned a fault exception. .
Try to enable tracing why you have a communication error .
They cost us the game last night in Dallas.. The Spurs hit only 10 of 19 foul shots. Their 52.6 percentage was a season-low and was their lowest since shooting 50 percent from the line in a loss to Portland on March 28, 2011.
Started by on , 11 posts by 10 people.  
For every free throw we missed.
Let's not forget Dallas missed some chippies as well...
For these guys, either.
Page: 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10  

Related Message Boards & Forums

  • Stack Overflow
  • Spurs and NBA Fan Feedback - SpursReport.com
Related Searches
saving throw    throw it up and zshare    ladybug throw pillow    moto gp throw    throwing up dark bile    x2000 flood-to-throw review    e30 throwing stars    "Throw Ins"    throw it up zshare lil john    crips throwing up gang signs   
More Information


Forum Search About Omgili Help Plugins Forum/Board Owners Privacy

i
In Title
In Topic
In Reply
Exclude
Boost