|
Gibson Traditional pro vs traditional plus I am debating whether to go for a Gibson LP Traditional pro vs traditional plus.The pro seems to have coil spliting pups and locking tuners ,while the plus does not,yet is $300/- more.Any reasons?
Started by JCcares on
, 14 posts
by 9 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at harmony-central):
As far as play and feel....
Best neck pickup I've almost set to get a vintage Sunburst pro.Would the neck be slimmer than a traditional plus? What else body and neck.
Traditional pro I bought new few years ago..unique top so it cought my eye.
|
|
This or That -- Traditional spelling VS non Traditional spelling! (Girls version)? <--Traditional -- Non-Traditional-->
Adeline OR Adelyn
Brianna OR Breanna
Carly OR Carleigh
Delilah OR Daleila
Emily OR Emilie
Felicity OR Felissaty
Georgia OR Jorja...
Started by ♫*ฬเll๏ฬ гє๒єl-єשє*♫. on
, 25 posts
by 25 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at yahoo):
The German traditional spelling of the name)
~ Felicity OR Felissaty << Felicity
~ Georgia
~ Rebecca OR Rebekah << Rebekah (this actually is a traditional spelling, it's biblical)
~ Sarah
Tiffany
Vanessa
Whitney
I like mostly....
|
|
I heard about B-Method which is invented in France. Is it an alternative to traditional programming languages like c++ and java or is it a completely different thing with different purposes?
Started by Ala ABUDEEB on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Quote the B-website :
B is....
Basically, they can be used during development to describe and verify algorithms .
You can read up on Formal Methods on Wikipedia too .
No, as the Wikipedia article says, B-Method is a Formal Method not a programming language .
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
From the GAE getting started guide
Because the App Engine datastore is not a traditional relational database, queries are not specified using SQL. Instead, you can prepare queries using a SQL-like query language we call GQL.
What do they mean by "not ...
Started by hhafez on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
It's very functionally limited compared to a relational DB: no joins, no real data-integrity checks (such as uniqueness &c), no GROUP BY and aggregation functions such as SUM etc etc, transactions only within one entity-group, etc, etc -- MANY differences... .
|
|
In C# 3.0, I'm liking this style:
// Write the numbers 1 thru 7 foreach( int index in Enumerable.Range( 1, 7 ) ) { Console.WriteLine( index ); }
over the traditional for loop:
// Write the numbers 1 thru 7 for( int index = 1; index <= 7; index++ ) ...
Started by Marcel Lamothe on
, 13 posts
by 13 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
// does anyone object to the new style over the traditional style? foreach(var index.
The traditional format is fundamental to development and familiar to all.
That isn't really needed.
|
|
#10: Traditional British Cake Recipes (Traditional British Recipes)
Traditional British Cake Recipes (Traditional British Recipes)
Jane Romsey (Author)
(4)
//www.amazon.co.uk/Traditional-British-Cake-Recipes-ebook/dp/B0084UQB2O/ref=pd_zg_rss_tf_kinc_...
Started by PSPReview on
, 1 posts
by 1 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at dcemu):
|
|
Is there any performance testing results available in comparing traditional for loop vs Iterator while traversing a ArrayList,HashMap and other collections?
Or simply why should I use Iterator over for loop or vice versa?
Started by Harish on
, 9 posts
by 9 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Assuming this is what you meant:
// traditional.
For the reasons mentioned in the accepted answer.
|
|
Hi,
What are the general, traditional steps/stages to software development, or more specifically, specification writing?
I know of concepts like waterfall method, gathering specifications, use cases, etc. But I want a more formal explanation to it all...
Started by public static on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
I don't....
Each spec looks like all the others (ie "standard") - they all have the same sections .
Have a spec template.
See http://cc2e.com/
I found companies generally either:
Don't do specs.
The book Code Complete has practical coverage of this topic .
|
|
What are the benefits of developing MMC snap-ins instead of traditional GUI apps? AFAIK the MMC snap-ins can be loaded remotely to control some server applications but I have never dived deep in this approach. What are the pros and cons of MMC snap-in...
Started by huseyint on
, 6 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
The ....
I've never thought about the MMC's remotability, and how this might play into things .
Pros: Having a standardized UI is definitely a benefit, and since MMC is a pre-built UI, you also don't have to build that part, but simply add the logic to it .
|
|
Suppose one is using Microsoft's Entity Framework as an ORM to abstract/work with a database. Next comes a requirement which causes the application to have the need to work with a WCF service and a traditional database, simultaneously.
To my knowledge...
Started by Roberto Sebestyen on
, 3 posts
by 3 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/data/bb931106.aspx
Well, I think you're getting things a bit mixed up here:
A ORM is needed... .
When .net 4 is available you will be able to use EF with Plain Old CLR Objects (POCO) .
Have a look at the new WCF Data Services.
|
