|
Planning on building a kennel using treated wood except for the floor. Heard on a forum that you should not use treated wood on these due to the "poison" in the wood. I thought that was the old stuff. Any thoughts?
Started by huntemup on
, 12 posts
by 12 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at huntingboards):
Treated....
No health problems, have had for 8 years now.
Al Had a treated floor for about 8 years now & one of my females has been on it since day 1.
All my above kennels are made of treated wood and havent had any problems for 20 years.
|
|
Help me settle an argument here.
Is this:
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand( "sql cmd", conn);
treated exactly the same as this:
const string s = "sql cmd"; SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand( s, conn);
Ie. does it make a difference if I state specifically...
Started by Mr. Flibble on
, 7 posts
by 7 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
This is not quite the ....
In the latter snippet, it's not that the string is const - it's that the variable is const .
Yes, those are exactly the same.
The constructor of the SqlCommand will not "see" any difference, and will therefore act the same way .
|
|
Girls what do you preffer? to be treated with love by a boy or to be treated like an object by a boy? Why?
Started by Joe on
, 6 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at yahoo):
Definitely treated with love,....
Why? Because that is the way I was born.
Does the minority needs of said Girl be treated like an object? If so, I would? Neither, I prefer to be treated with love by a girl.
Oligarchy and plutocracy.
|
Ask your Facebook Friends
|
Have the news media treated Kathie Lee Gifford's awkward moment the same way that they treated Dan Quayle's?
Started by professionaleccentric on
, 2 posts
by 2 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at yahoo):
No
They only come down hard on you for your honest mistakes if you're shamelessly conservative. .
|
|
The following code
using System.Threading; class Test { volatile int counter = 0; public void Increment() { Interlocked.Increment(ref counter); } }
Raises the following compiler warning:
"A reference to a volatile field will not be treated as volatile...
Started by Jader Dias on
, 5 posts
by 5 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
For Interlocked.Increment that probably it will not be treated ....
Is that the target method has no idea the field is marked as volatile , and therefore will not treat, the calling code doesn't know to treat it in a volatile manner.
|
|
I'm trying to sort out an opt in mailing list system. I understand the basic principles and design required but i'm having an issue with it being picked up as spam.
If i send a html email through outlook through email@domain.com it works fine and is not...
Started by SocialAddict on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
When you use a paid.
Roll your own mail" is often treated as spam by large hosted email systems.
|
|
In PHP, empty() is a great shortcut because it allows you to check whether a variable is defined AND not empty at the same time.
What would you use when you don't want "0" (as a string) to be considered empty, but you still want false, null, 0 and "" ...
Started by thomasrutter on
, 6 posts
by 6 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
If ((isset($var) && $var === "0") || !empty($var)) { }
This way you will enter the if-construct if the variable is set AND is "0", OR the variable is set AND not = null ("0",null,false)
This should do what you want:
function notempty($var) { return (... .
|
|
I recently saw the below code ( simplified version given below) in my code base and got this doubt:
class B; class A { public: A():m_A("testA"){} B& getB() { return m_B; } B* getBPtr() //== > written to explain the problem clearly { return &m_B; } ...
Started by aJ on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Since there is no way to get any other address... .
Taking the address of a reference returns the address of the original thing .
Yes it is equivalent.
You always get the address of the referred object.
Yes, it's not possible to take the address of a reference .
|
|
I am new to lisp and am writing a few simple programs to get more familiar with it. One of the things I am doing is writing a recursive and iterative version of a factorial method. However, I have come across a problem and can't seem to solve it.
I saw...
Started by Aaron on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
In Lisp, local variables....
You need to bind the variable 'result' - using 'let', for example - before starting to use it:
(defun it-fact(num) (let ((result 1)) (dotimes (i num) (setf result (* result (+ i 1
For futher details you might want to read this .. .
|
|
I'm getting a C++ compiler error which I'm not familiar with. Probably a really stupid mistake, but I can't quite put my finger on it.
Error:
test.cpp:27: error: member initializer expression list treated as compound expression test.cpp:27: warning: left...
Started by Gilad Naor on
, 4 posts
by 4 people.
Answer Snippets (Read the full thread at stackoverflow):
Initializer expression list treated as compound expression t.cpp:6: error: invalid initialization.
|
